KIRK Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Foot Locker has a net margin of -6.71% compared to Kirkland's's net margin of -1.68%. Kirkland's's return on equity of -326.24% beat Foot Locker's return on equity of -14.45%.

Kirkland's has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 160.12%. On the other hand Foot Locker has an analysts' consensus of $23.88 which suggests that it could grow by 9.57%. Given that Kirkland's has higher upside potential than Foot Locker, analysts believe Kirkland's is more attractive than Foot Locker.

Kirkland's has a beta of 2.422, which suggesting that the stock is 142.204% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Foot Locker has a beta of 1.465, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 46.524%.

Kirkland's has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Foot Locker offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share. Kirkland's pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Foot Locker pays out -34.24% of its earnings as a dividend.

Kirkland's quarterly revenues are $114.4M, which are smaller than Foot Locker quarterly revenues of $2B. Kirkland's's net income of -$7.7M is higher than Foot Locker's net income of -$33M. Notably, Kirkland's's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Foot Locker's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kirkland's is 0.05x versus 0.25x for Foot Locker. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

The Home Depot has a net margin of -6.71% compared to Kirkland's's net margin of 9.07%. Kirkland's's return on equity of -326.24% beat The Home Depot's return on equity of 503.79%.

Kirkland's has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 160.12%. On the other hand The Home Depot has an analysts' consensus of $381.47 which suggests that it could grow by 8.9%. Given that Kirkland's has higher upside potential than The Home Depot, analysts believe Kirkland's is more attractive than The Home Depot.

Kirkland's has a beta of 2.422, which suggesting that the stock is 142.204% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Home Depot has a beta of 1.030, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.029%.

Kirkland's has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. The Home Depot offers a yield of 2.27% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $2.25 per share. Kirkland's pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. The Home Depot pays out 55.36% of its earnings as a dividend. The Home Depot's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Kirkland's quarterly revenues are $114.4M, which are smaller than The Home Depot quarterly revenues of $40.2B. Kirkland's's net income of -$7.7M is lower than The Home Depot's net income of $3.6B. Notably, Kirkland's's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while The Home Depot's PE ratio is 26.91x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kirkland's is 0.05x versus 2.54x for The Home Depot. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lowe's Companies has a net margin of -6.71% compared to Kirkland's's net margin of 8.4%. Kirkland's's return on equity of -326.24% beat Lowe's Companies's return on equity of --.

Kirkland's has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 160.12%. On the other hand Lowe's Companies has an analysts' consensus of $251.37 which suggests that it could grow by 13.16%. Given that Kirkland's has higher upside potential than Lowe's Companies, analysts believe Kirkland's is more attractive than Lowe's Companies.

Kirkland's has a beta of 2.422, which suggesting that the stock is 142.204% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lowe's Companies has a beta of 1.095, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 9.544%.

Kirkland's has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Lowe's Companies offers a yield of 1.8% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.15 per share. Kirkland's pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Lowe's Companies pays out 32.76% of its earnings as a dividend. Lowe's Companies's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Kirkland's quarterly revenues are $114.4M, which are smaller than Lowe's Companies quarterly revenues of $20.2B. Kirkland's's net income of -$7.7M is lower than Lowe's Companies's net income of $1.7B. Notably, Kirkland's's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Lowe's Companies's PE ratio is 20.87x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kirkland's is 0.05x versus 1.71x for Lowe's Companies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Ulta Beauty has a net margin of -6.71% compared to Kirkland's's net margin of 9.57%. Kirkland's's return on equity of -326.24% beat Ulta Beauty's return on equity of 53.26%.

Kirkland's has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 160.12%. On the other hand Ulta Beauty has an analysts' consensus of $438.31 which suggests that it could grow by 0.69%. Given that Kirkland's has higher upside potential than Ulta Beauty, analysts believe Kirkland's is more attractive than Ulta Beauty.

Kirkland's has a beta of 2.422, which suggesting that the stock is 142.204% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ulta Beauty has a beta of 1.325, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 32.496%.

Kirkland's has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Ulta Beauty offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Kirkland's pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ulta Beauty pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Kirkland's quarterly revenues are $114.4M, which are smaller than Ulta Beauty quarterly revenues of $2.5B. Kirkland's's net income of -$7.7M is lower than Ulta Beauty's net income of $242.2M. Notably, Kirkland's's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Ulta Beauty's PE ratio is 17.42x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kirkland's is 0.05x versus 1.84x for Ulta Beauty. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.