CASY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

J.Jill has a net margin of 2.23% compared to Casey's General Stores's net margin of 1.57%. Casey's General Stores's return on equity of 16.85% beat J.Jill's return on equity of 50.66%.

Casey's General Stores has a consensus price target of $449.88, signalling upside risk potential of 2.41%. On the other hand J.Jill has an analysts' consensus of $28.60 which suggests that it could grow by 66.76%. Given that J.Jill has higher upside potential than Casey's General Stores, analysts believe J.Jill is more attractive than Casey's General Stores.

Casey's General Stores has a beta of 0.654, which suggesting that the stock is 34.593% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison J.Jill has a beta of 0.517, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 48.31%.

Casey's General Stores has a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.46%. J.Jill offers a yield of 1.69% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share. Casey's General Stores pays 12.53% of its earnings as a dividend. J.Jill pays out 7.34% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Casey's General Stores quarterly revenues are $3.9B, which are larger than J.Jill quarterly revenues of $142.8M. Casey's General Stores's net income of $87.1M is higher than J.Jill's net income of $2.2M. Notably, Casey's General Stores's price-to-earnings ratio is 30.61x while J.Jill's PE ratio is 6.50x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Casey's General Stores is 1.05x versus 0.43x for J.Jill. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

O'Reilly Automotive has a net margin of 2.23% compared to Casey's General Stores's net margin of 13.02%. Casey's General Stores's return on equity of 16.85% beat O'Reilly Automotive's return on equity of --.

Casey's General Stores has a consensus price target of $449.88, signalling upside risk potential of 2.41%. On the other hand O'Reilly Automotive has an analysts' consensus of $97.25 which suggests that it could grow by 8.21%. Given that O'Reilly Automotive has higher upside potential than Casey's General Stores, analysts believe O'Reilly Automotive is more attractive than Casey's General Stores.

Casey's General Stores has a beta of 0.654, which suggesting that the stock is 34.593% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison O'Reilly Automotive has a beta of 0.597, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 40.334%.

Casey's General Stores has a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.46%. O'Reilly Automotive offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Casey's General Stores pays 12.53% of its earnings as a dividend. O'Reilly Automotive pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Casey's General Stores's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Casey's General Stores quarterly revenues are $3.9B, which are smaller than O'Reilly Automotive quarterly revenues of $4.1B. Casey's General Stores's net income of $87.1M is lower than O'Reilly Automotive's net income of $538.5M. Notably, Casey's General Stores's price-to-earnings ratio is 30.61x while O'Reilly Automotive's PE ratio is 33.03x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Casey's General Stores is 1.05x versus 0.02x for O'Reilly Automotive. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Stitch Fix has a net margin of 2.23% compared to Casey's General Stores's net margin of -2.09%. Casey's General Stores's return on equity of 16.85% beat Stitch Fix's return on equity of -35.4%.

Casey's General Stores has a consensus price target of $449.88, signalling upside risk potential of 2.41%. On the other hand Stitch Fix has an analysts' consensus of $4.70 which suggests that it could fall by -0.63%. Given that Casey's General Stores has higher upside potential than Stitch Fix, analysts believe Casey's General Stores is more attractive than Stitch Fix.

Casey's General Stores has a beta of 0.654, which suggesting that the stock is 34.593% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Stitch Fix has a beta of 2.000, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 100.049%.

Casey's General Stores has a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.46%. Stitch Fix offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Casey's General Stores pays 12.53% of its earnings as a dividend. Stitch Fix pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Casey's General Stores's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Casey's General Stores quarterly revenues are $3.9B, which are larger than Stitch Fix quarterly revenues of $312.1M. Casey's General Stores's net income of $87.1M is higher than Stitch Fix's net income of -$6.5M. Notably, Casey's General Stores's price-to-earnings ratio is 30.61x while Stitch Fix's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Casey's General Stores is 1.05x versus 0.46x for Stitch Fix. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Ulta Beauty has a net margin of 2.23% compared to Casey's General Stores's net margin of 10.71%. Casey's General Stores's return on equity of 16.85% beat Ulta Beauty's return on equity of 50.14%.

Casey's General Stores has a consensus price target of $449.88, signalling upside risk potential of 2.41%. On the other hand Ulta Beauty has an analysts' consensus of $475.32 which suggests that it could grow by 2.08%. Given that Casey's General Stores has higher upside potential than Ulta Beauty, analysts believe Casey's General Stores is more attractive than Ulta Beauty.

Casey's General Stores has a beta of 0.654, which suggesting that the stock is 34.593% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ulta Beauty has a beta of 1.088, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.798%.

Casey's General Stores has a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.46%. Ulta Beauty offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Casey's General Stores pays 12.53% of its earnings as a dividend. Ulta Beauty pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Casey's General Stores's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Casey's General Stores quarterly revenues are $3.9B, which are larger than Ulta Beauty quarterly revenues of $2.8B. Casey's General Stores's net income of $87.1M is lower than Ulta Beauty's net income of $305.1M. Notably, Casey's General Stores's price-to-earnings ratio is 30.61x while Ulta Beauty's PE ratio is 18.19x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Casey's General Stores is 1.05x versus 1.90x for Ulta Beauty. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.