CASY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Etsy has a net margin of 2.23% compared to Casey's General Stores's net margin of -8%. Casey's General Stores's return on equity of 16.85% beat Etsy's return on equity of --.

Casey's General Stores has a consensus price target of $452.56, signalling upside risk potential of 1.53%. On the other hand Etsy has an analysts' consensus of $50.34 which suggests that it could grow by 5.75%. Given that Etsy has higher upside potential than Casey's General Stores, analysts believe Etsy is more attractive than Casey's General Stores.

Casey's General Stores has a beta of 0.698, which suggesting that the stock is 30.181% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Etsy has a beta of 1.778, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 77.77%.

Casey's General Stores has a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.45%. Etsy offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Casey's General Stores pays 12.53% of its earnings as a dividend. Etsy pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Casey's General Stores's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Casey's General Stores quarterly revenues are $3.9B, which are larger than Etsy quarterly revenues of $651.2M. Casey's General Stores's net income of $87.1M is higher than Etsy's net income of -$52.1M. Notably, Casey's General Stores's price-to-earnings ratio is 31.06x while Etsy's PE ratio is 34.00x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Casey's General Stores is 1.07x versus 2.11x for Etsy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Leslies has a net margin of 2.23% compared to Casey's General Stores's net margin of -28.97%. Casey's General Stores's return on equity of 16.85% beat Leslies's return on equity of --.

Casey's General Stores has a consensus price target of $452.56, signalling upside risk potential of 1.53%. On the other hand Leslies has an analysts' consensus of $1.37 which suggests that it could grow by 59.17%. Given that Leslies has higher upside potential than Casey's General Stores, analysts believe Leslies is more attractive than Casey's General Stores.

Casey's General Stores has a beta of 0.698, which suggesting that the stock is 30.181% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Leslies has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Casey's General Stores has a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.45%. Leslies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Casey's General Stores pays 12.53% of its earnings as a dividend. Leslies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Casey's General Stores's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Casey's General Stores quarterly revenues are $3.9B, which are larger than Leslies quarterly revenues of $177.1M. Casey's General Stores's net income of $87.1M is higher than Leslies's net income of -$51.3M. Notably, Casey's General Stores's price-to-earnings ratio is 31.06x while Leslies's PE ratio is 151.00x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Casey's General Stores is 1.07x versus 0.12x for Leslies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Natural Health Trends has a net margin of 2.23% compared to Casey's General Stores's net margin of 1.14%. Casey's General Stores's return on equity of 16.85% beat Natural Health Trends's return on equity of 1.44%.

Casey's General Stores has a consensus price target of $452.56, signalling upside risk potential of 1.53%. On the other hand Natural Health Trends has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 546.97%. Given that Natural Health Trends has higher upside potential than Casey's General Stores, analysts believe Natural Health Trends is more attractive than Casey's General Stores.

Casey's General Stores has a beta of 0.698, which suggesting that the stock is 30.181% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Natural Health Trends has a beta of 0.862, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 13.792%.

Casey's General Stores has a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.45%. Natural Health Trends offers a yield of 17.25% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share. Casey's General Stores pays 12.53% of its earnings as a dividend. Natural Health Trends pays out 1610.66% of its earnings as a dividend. Casey's General Stores's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Natural Health Trends's is not.

Casey's General Stores quarterly revenues are $3.9B, which are larger than Natural Health Trends quarterly revenues of $10.7M. Casey's General Stores's net income of $87.1M is higher than Natural Health Trends's net income of $122K. Notably, Casey's General Stores's price-to-earnings ratio is 31.06x while Natural Health Trends's PE ratio is 87.41x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Casey's General Stores is 1.07x versus 1.25x for Natural Health Trends. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tractor Supply has a net margin of 2.23% compared to Casey's General Stores's net margin of 5.17%. Casey's General Stores's return on equity of 16.85% beat Tractor Supply's return on equity of 48.21%.

Casey's General Stores has a consensus price target of $452.56, signalling upside risk potential of 1.53%. On the other hand Tractor Supply has an analysts' consensus of $54.37 which suggests that it could grow by 9.4%. Given that Tractor Supply has higher upside potential than Casey's General Stores, analysts believe Tractor Supply is more attractive than Casey's General Stores.

Casey's General Stores has a beta of 0.698, which suggesting that the stock is 30.181% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tractor Supply has a beta of 0.823, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 17.661%.

Casey's General Stores has a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.45%. Tractor Supply offers a yield of 1.79% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share. Casey's General Stores pays 12.53% of its earnings as a dividend. Tractor Supply pays out 42.91% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Casey's General Stores quarterly revenues are $3.9B, which are larger than Tractor Supply quarterly revenues of $3.5B. Casey's General Stores's net income of $87.1M is lower than Tractor Supply's net income of $179.4M. Notably, Casey's General Stores's price-to-earnings ratio is 31.06x while Tractor Supply's PE ratio is 24.68x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Casey's General Stores is 1.07x versus 1.79x for Tractor Supply. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.