KALU Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Century Aluminum has a net margin of 2.78% compared to Kaiser Aluminum's net margin of 4.69%. Kaiser Aluminum's return on equity of 6.41% beat Century Aluminum's return on equity of 18.99%.

Kaiser Aluminum has a consensus price target of $69.00, signalling downside risk potential of -18.02%. On the other hand Century Aluminum has an analysts' consensus of $22.67 which suggests that it could grow by 20.12%. Given that Century Aluminum has higher upside potential than Kaiser Aluminum, analysts believe Century Aluminum is more attractive than Kaiser Aluminum.

Kaiser Aluminum has a beta of 1.443, which suggesting that the stock is 44.285% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Century Aluminum has a beta of 2.547, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 154.749%.

Kaiser Aluminum has a quarterly dividend of $0.77 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.66%. Century Aluminum offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Kaiser Aluminum pays 108.33% of its earnings as a dividend. Century Aluminum pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Kaiser Aluminum quarterly revenues are $777.4M, which are larger than Century Aluminum quarterly revenues of $633.9M. Kaiser Aluminum's net income of $21.6M is lower than Century Aluminum's net income of $29.7M. Notably, Kaiser Aluminum's price-to-earnings ratio is 31.52x while Century Aluminum's PE ratio is 16.27x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kaiser Aluminum is 0.45x versus 0.77x for Century Aluminum. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Commercial Metals has a net margin of 2.78% compared to Kaiser Aluminum's net margin of 4.12%. Kaiser Aluminum's return on equity of 6.41% beat Commercial Metals's return on equity of 0.89%.

Kaiser Aluminum has a consensus price target of $69.00, signalling downside risk potential of -18.02%. On the other hand Commercial Metals has an analysts' consensus of $54.39 which suggests that it could grow by 4.71%. Given that Commercial Metals has higher upside potential than Kaiser Aluminum, analysts believe Commercial Metals is more attractive than Kaiser Aluminum.

Kaiser Aluminum has a beta of 1.443, which suggesting that the stock is 44.285% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Commercial Metals has a beta of 1.262, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 26.213%.

Kaiser Aluminum has a quarterly dividend of $0.77 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.66%. Commercial Metals offers a yield of 1.39% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share. Kaiser Aluminum pays 108.33% of its earnings as a dividend. Commercial Metals pays out 16.25% of its earnings as a dividend. Commercial Metals's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Kaiser Aluminum's is not.

Kaiser Aluminum quarterly revenues are $777.4M, which are smaller than Commercial Metals quarterly revenues of $2B. Kaiser Aluminum's net income of $21.6M is lower than Commercial Metals's net income of $83.1M. Notably, Kaiser Aluminum's price-to-earnings ratio is 31.52x while Commercial Metals's PE ratio is 167.55x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kaiser Aluminum is 0.45x versus 0.77x for Commercial Metals. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Constellium SE has a net margin of 2.78% compared to Kaiser Aluminum's net margin of 1.87%. Kaiser Aluminum's return on equity of 6.41% beat Constellium SE's return on equity of 7.91%.

Kaiser Aluminum has a consensus price target of $69.00, signalling downside risk potential of -18.02%. On the other hand Constellium SE has an analysts' consensus of $15.07 which suggests that it could grow by 6.53%. Given that Constellium SE has higher upside potential than Kaiser Aluminum, analysts believe Constellium SE is more attractive than Kaiser Aluminum.

Kaiser Aluminum has a beta of 1.443, which suggesting that the stock is 44.285% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Constellium SE has a beta of 1.627, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 62.72%.

Kaiser Aluminum has a quarterly dividend of $0.77 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.66%. Constellium SE offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Kaiser Aluminum pays 108.33% of its earnings as a dividend. Constellium SE pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Kaiser Aluminum quarterly revenues are $777.4M, which are smaller than Constellium SE quarterly revenues of $2B. Kaiser Aluminum's net income of $21.6M is lower than Constellium SE's net income of $37M. Notably, Kaiser Aluminum's price-to-earnings ratio is 31.52x while Constellium SE's PE ratio is 30.97x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kaiser Aluminum is 0.45x versus 0.28x for Constellium SE. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Steel Dynamics has a net margin of 2.78% compared to Kaiser Aluminum's net margin of 4.97%. Kaiser Aluminum's return on equity of 6.41% beat Steel Dynamics's return on equity of 13%.

Kaiser Aluminum has a consensus price target of $69.00, signalling downside risk potential of -18.02%. On the other hand Steel Dynamics has an analysts' consensus of $147.37 which suggests that it could grow by 13.23%. Given that Steel Dynamics has higher upside potential than Kaiser Aluminum, analysts believe Steel Dynamics is more attractive than Kaiser Aluminum.

Kaiser Aluminum has a beta of 1.443, which suggesting that the stock is 44.285% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Steel Dynamics has a beta of 1.370, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 36.988%.

Kaiser Aluminum has a quarterly dividend of $0.77 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.66%. Steel Dynamics offers a yield of 1.48% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share. Kaiser Aluminum pays 108.33% of its earnings as a dividend. Steel Dynamics pays out 18.39% of its earnings as a dividend. Steel Dynamics's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Kaiser Aluminum's is not.

Kaiser Aluminum quarterly revenues are $777.4M, which are smaller than Steel Dynamics quarterly revenues of $4.4B. Kaiser Aluminum's net income of $21.6M is lower than Steel Dynamics's net income of $217.2M. Notably, Kaiser Aluminum's price-to-earnings ratio is 31.52x while Steel Dynamics's PE ratio is 17.19x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kaiser Aluminum is 0.45x versus 1.16x for Steel Dynamics. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.