IRBT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Flanigan'S Enterprises has a net margin of -3.29% compared to iRobot's net margin of 2.3%. iRobot's return on equity of -69.28% beat Flanigan'S Enterprises's return on equity of 4.04%.

iRobot has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 44.28%. On the other hand Flanigan'S Enterprises has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that iRobot has higher upside potential than Flanigan'S Enterprises, analysts believe iRobot is more attractive than Flanigan'S Enterprises.

iRobot has a beta of 0.831, which suggesting that the stock is 16.904% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Flanigan'S Enterprises has a beta of 0.707, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 29.258%.

iRobot has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Flanigan'S Enterprises offers a yield of 2.01% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share. iRobot pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Flanigan'S Enterprises pays out 20.96% of its earnings as a dividend. Flanigan'S Enterprises's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

iRobot quarterly revenues are $193.4M, which are larger than Flanigan'S Enterprises quarterly revenues of $48.8M. iRobot's net income of -$6.4M is lower than Flanigan'S Enterprises's net income of $1.1M. Notably, iRobot's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Flanigan'S Enterprises's PE ratio is 15.25x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for iRobot is 0.28x versus 0.25x for Flanigan'S Enterprises. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Document Security Systems has a net margin of -3.29% compared to iRobot's net margin of --. iRobot's return on equity of -69.28% beat Document Security Systems's return on equity of --.

iRobot has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 44.28%. On the other hand Document Security Systems has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that iRobot has higher upside potential than Document Security Systems, analysts believe iRobot is more attractive than Document Security Systems.

iRobot has a beta of 0.831, which suggesting that the stock is 16.904% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Document Security Systems has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

iRobot has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Document Security Systems offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. iRobot pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Document Security Systems pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

iRobot quarterly revenues are $193.4M, which are larger than Document Security Systems quarterly revenues of --. iRobot's net income of -$6.4M is higher than Document Security Systems's net income of --. Notably, iRobot's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Document Security Systems's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for iRobot is 0.28x versus -- for Document Security Systems. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Envela has a net margin of -3.29% compared to iRobot's net margin of 3.59%. iRobot's return on equity of -69.28% beat Envela's return on equity of 13.11%.

iRobot has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 44.28%. On the other hand Envela has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 9.36%. Given that iRobot has higher upside potential than Envela, analysts believe iRobot is more attractive than Envela.

iRobot has a beta of 0.831, which suggesting that the stock is 16.904% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Envela has a beta of 0.310, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 68.983%.

iRobot has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Envela offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. iRobot pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Envela pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

iRobot quarterly revenues are $193.4M, which are larger than Envela quarterly revenues of $46.9M. iRobot's net income of -$6.4M is lower than Envela's net income of $1.7M. Notably, iRobot's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Envela's PE ratio is 30.48x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for iRobot is 0.28x versus 1.16x for Envela. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Whirlpool has a net margin of -3.29% compared to iRobot's net margin of 2.73%. iRobot's return on equity of -69.28% beat Whirlpool's return on equity of 19.94%.

iRobot has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 44.28%. On the other hand Whirlpool has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -4.63%. Given that iRobot has higher upside potential than Whirlpool, analysts believe iRobot is more attractive than Whirlpool.

iRobot has a beta of 0.831, which suggesting that the stock is 16.904% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Whirlpool has a beta of 1.454, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 45.379%.

iRobot has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Whirlpool offers a yield of 6.01% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.75 per share. iRobot pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Whirlpool pays out 79.83% of its earnings as a dividend. Whirlpool's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

iRobot quarterly revenues are $193.4M, which are smaller than Whirlpool quarterly revenues of $4B. iRobot's net income of -$6.4M is lower than Whirlpool's net income of $109M. Notably, iRobot's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Whirlpool's PE ratio is 11.49x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for iRobot is 0.28x versus 0.37x for Whirlpool. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.