WHR Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

The Home Depot has a net margin of 1.96% compared to Whirlpool's net margin of 8.61%. Whirlpool's return on equity of 0.23% beat The Home Depot's return on equity of 274.95%.

Whirlpool has a consensus price target of $99.43, signalling upside risk potential of 26.47%. On the other hand The Home Depot has an analysts' consensus of $418.95 which suggests that it could grow by 13.76%. Given that Whirlpool has higher upside potential than The Home Depot, analysts believe Whirlpool is more attractive than The Home Depot.

Whirlpool has a beta of 1.203, which suggesting that the stock is 20.283% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Home Depot has a beta of 1.055, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 5.497%.

Whirlpool has a quarterly dividend of $1.75 per share corresponding to a yield of 8.9%. The Home Depot offers a yield of 2.46% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $2.30 per share. Whirlpool pays -118.89% of its earnings as a dividend. The Home Depot pays out 60.31% of its earnings as a dividend. The Home Depot's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Whirlpool quarterly revenues are $3.6B, which are smaller than The Home Depot quarterly revenues of $39.9B. Whirlpool's net income of $71M is lower than The Home Depot's net income of $3.4B. Notably, Whirlpool's price-to-earnings ratio is 561.57x while The Home Depot's PE ratio is 24.99x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Whirlpool is 0.28x versus 2.25x for The Home Depot. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lowe's Companies has a net margin of 1.96% compared to Whirlpool's net margin of 7.84%. Whirlpool's return on equity of 0.23% beat Lowe's Companies's return on equity of --.

Whirlpool has a consensus price target of $99.43, signalling upside risk potential of 26.47%. On the other hand Lowe's Companies has an analysts' consensus of $264.66 which suggests that it could grow by 17.25%. Given that Whirlpool has higher upside potential than Lowe's Companies, analysts believe Whirlpool is more attractive than Lowe's Companies.

Whirlpool has a beta of 1.203, which suggesting that the stock is 20.283% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lowe's Companies has a beta of 0.997, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.274%.

Whirlpool has a quarterly dividend of $1.75 per share corresponding to a yield of 8.9%. Lowe's Companies offers a yield of 2.04% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.15 per share. Whirlpool pays -118.89% of its earnings as a dividend. Lowe's Companies pays out 36.88% of its earnings as a dividend. Lowe's Companies's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Whirlpool quarterly revenues are $3.6B, which are smaller than Lowe's Companies quarterly revenues of $20.9B. Whirlpool's net income of $71M is lower than Lowe's Companies's net income of $1.6B. Notably, Whirlpool's price-to-earnings ratio is 561.57x while Lowe's Companies's PE ratio is 18.70x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Whirlpool is 0.28x versus 1.53x for Lowe's Companies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Mohawk Industries has a net margin of 1.96% compared to Whirlpool's net margin of 2.87%. Whirlpool's return on equity of 0.23% beat Mohawk Industries's return on equity of 6.29%.

Whirlpool has a consensus price target of $99.43, signalling upside risk potential of 26.47%. On the other hand Mohawk Industries has an analysts' consensus of $126.72 which suggests that it could grow by 25.96%. Given that Whirlpool has higher upside potential than Mohawk Industries, analysts believe Whirlpool is more attractive than Mohawk Industries.

Whirlpool has a beta of 1.203, which suggesting that the stock is 20.283% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Mohawk Industries has a beta of 1.240, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 23.957%.

Whirlpool has a quarterly dividend of $1.75 per share corresponding to a yield of 8.9%. Mohawk Industries offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Whirlpool pays -118.89% of its earnings as a dividend. Mohawk Industries pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Whirlpool quarterly revenues are $3.6B, which are larger than Mohawk Industries quarterly revenues of $2.5B. Whirlpool's net income of $71M is lower than Mohawk Industries's net income of $72.6M. Notably, Whirlpool's price-to-earnings ratio is 561.57x while Mohawk Industries's PE ratio is 13.17x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Whirlpool is 0.28x versus 0.60x for Mohawk Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tesla has a net margin of 1.96% compared to Whirlpool's net margin of 2.12%. Whirlpool's return on equity of 0.23% beat Tesla's return on equity of 9.1%.

Whirlpool has a consensus price target of $99.43, signalling upside risk potential of 26.47%. On the other hand Tesla has an analysts' consensus of $299.38 which suggests that it could fall by -16.48%. Given that Whirlpool has higher upside potential than Tesla, analysts believe Whirlpool is more attractive than Tesla.

Whirlpool has a beta of 1.203, which suggesting that the stock is 20.283% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tesla has a beta of 2.429, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 142.869%.

Whirlpool has a quarterly dividend of $1.75 per share corresponding to a yield of 8.9%. Tesla offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Whirlpool pays -118.89% of its earnings as a dividend. Tesla pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Whirlpool quarterly revenues are $3.6B, which are smaller than Tesla quarterly revenues of $19.3B. Whirlpool's net income of $71M is lower than Tesla's net income of $409M. Notably, Whirlpool's price-to-earnings ratio is 561.57x while Tesla's PE ratio is 196.94x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Whirlpool is 0.28x versus 13.13x for Tesla. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.