WHR Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

The Home Depot has a net margin of 1.96% compared to Whirlpool's net margin of 8.61%. Whirlpool's return on equity of 0.23% beat The Home Depot's return on equity of 274.95%.

Whirlpool has a consensus price target of $99.43, signalling upside risk potential of 13.56%. On the other hand The Home Depot has an analysts' consensus of $418.64 which suggests that it could grow by 18.04%. Given that The Home Depot has higher upside potential than Whirlpool, analysts believe The Home Depot is more attractive than Whirlpool.

Whirlpool has a beta of 1.181, which suggesting that the stock is 18.099% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Home Depot has a beta of 1.017, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.683%.

Whirlpool has a quarterly dividend of $1.75 per share corresponding to a yield of 8%. The Home Depot offers a yield of 2.57% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $2.30 per share. Whirlpool pays -118.89% of its earnings as a dividend. The Home Depot pays out 60.31% of its earnings as a dividend. The Home Depot's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Whirlpool quarterly revenues are $3.6B, which are smaller than The Home Depot quarterly revenues of $39.9B. Whirlpool's net income of $71M is lower than The Home Depot's net income of $3.4B. Notably, Whirlpool's price-to-earnings ratio is 625.43x while The Home Depot's PE ratio is 24.06x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Whirlpool is 0.31x versus 2.16x for The Home Depot. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

LGI Homes has a net margin of 1.96% compared to Whirlpool's net margin of 1.14%. Whirlpool's return on equity of 0.23% beat LGI Homes's return on equity of 9.27%.

Whirlpool has a consensus price target of $99.43, signalling upside risk potential of 13.56%. On the other hand LGI Homes has an analysts' consensus of $95.00 which suggests that it could grow by 91.15%. Given that LGI Homes has higher upside potential than Whirlpool, analysts believe LGI Homes is more attractive than Whirlpool.

Whirlpool has a beta of 1.181, which suggesting that the stock is 18.099% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison LGI Homes has a beta of 1.775, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 77.481%.

Whirlpool has a quarterly dividend of $1.75 per share corresponding to a yield of 8%. LGI Homes offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Whirlpool pays -118.89% of its earnings as a dividend. LGI Homes pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Whirlpool quarterly revenues are $3.6B, which are larger than LGI Homes quarterly revenues of $351.4M. Whirlpool's net income of $71M is higher than LGI Homes's net income of $4M. Notably, Whirlpool's price-to-earnings ratio is 625.43x while LGI Homes's PE ratio is 6.41x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Whirlpool is 0.31x versus 0.54x for LGI Homes. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lowe's Companies has a net margin of 1.96% compared to Whirlpool's net margin of 7.84%. Whirlpool's return on equity of 0.23% beat Lowe's Companies's return on equity of --.

Whirlpool has a consensus price target of $99.43, signalling upside risk potential of 13.56%. On the other hand Lowe's Companies has an analysts' consensus of $263.74 which suggests that it could grow by 21.39%. Given that Lowe's Companies has higher upside potential than Whirlpool, analysts believe Lowe's Companies is more attractive than Whirlpool.

Whirlpool has a beta of 1.181, which suggesting that the stock is 18.099% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lowe's Companies has a beta of 0.924, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.552%.

Whirlpool has a quarterly dividend of $1.75 per share corresponding to a yield of 8%. Lowe's Companies offers a yield of 2.12% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.15 per share. Whirlpool pays -118.89% of its earnings as a dividend. Lowe's Companies pays out 36.88% of its earnings as a dividend. Lowe's Companies's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Whirlpool quarterly revenues are $3.6B, which are smaller than Lowe's Companies quarterly revenues of $20.9B. Whirlpool's net income of $71M is lower than Lowe's Companies's net income of $1.6B. Notably, Whirlpool's price-to-earnings ratio is 625.43x while Lowe's Companies's PE ratio is 18.00x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Whirlpool is 0.31x versus 1.47x for Lowe's Companies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tesla has a net margin of 1.96% compared to Whirlpool's net margin of 2.12%. Whirlpool's return on equity of 0.23% beat Tesla's return on equity of 9.1%.

Whirlpool has a consensus price target of $99.43, signalling upside risk potential of 13.56%. On the other hand Tesla has an analysts' consensus of $301.56 which suggests that it could fall by -5.5%. Given that Whirlpool has higher upside potential than Tesla, analysts believe Whirlpool is more attractive than Tesla.

Whirlpool has a beta of 1.181, which suggesting that the stock is 18.099% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tesla has a beta of 2.468, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 146.818%.

Whirlpool has a quarterly dividend of $1.75 per share corresponding to a yield of 8%. Tesla offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Whirlpool pays -118.89% of its earnings as a dividend. Tesla pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Whirlpool quarterly revenues are $3.6B, which are smaller than Tesla quarterly revenues of $19.3B. Whirlpool's net income of $71M is lower than Tesla's net income of $409M. Notably, Whirlpool's price-to-earnings ratio is 625.43x while Tesla's PE ratio is 175.34x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Whirlpool is 0.31x versus 11.69x for Tesla. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.