INHD Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Friedman Industries has a net margin of -757.27% compared to Inno Holdings's net margin of 4.14%. Inno Holdings's return on equity of -105.62% beat Friedman Industries's return on equity of 4.71%.

Inno Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Friedman Industries has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Inno Holdings has higher upside potential than Friedman Industries, analysts believe Inno Holdings is more attractive than Friedman Industries.

Inno Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Friedman Industries has a beta of 1.485, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 48.545%.

Inno Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Friedman Industries offers a yield of 1.02% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share. Inno Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Friedman Industries pays out 18.32% of its earnings as a dividend. Friedman Industries's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Inno Holdings quarterly revenues are $478.1K, which are smaller than Friedman Industries quarterly revenues of $129.2M. Inno Holdings's net income of -$3.6M is lower than Friedman Industries's net income of $5.3M. Notably, Inno Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Friedman Industries's PE ratio is 18.21x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Inno Holdings is 3.41x versus 0.24x for Friedman Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Kaiser Aluminum has a net margin of -757.27% compared to Inno Holdings's net margin of 2.78%. Inno Holdings's return on equity of -105.62% beat Kaiser Aluminum's return on equity of 6.41%.

Inno Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Kaiser Aluminum has an analysts' consensus of $69.00 which suggests that it could fall by -21.89%. Given that Kaiser Aluminum has higher upside potential than Inno Holdings, analysts believe Kaiser Aluminum is more attractive than Inno Holdings.

Inno Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kaiser Aluminum has a beta of 1.443, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 44.285%.

Inno Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Kaiser Aluminum offers a yield of 3.49% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.77 per share. Inno Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Kaiser Aluminum pays out 108.33% of its earnings as a dividend.

Inno Holdings quarterly revenues are $478.1K, which are smaller than Kaiser Aluminum quarterly revenues of $777.4M. Inno Holdings's net income of -$3.6M is lower than Kaiser Aluminum's net income of $21.6M. Notably, Inno Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Kaiser Aluminum's PE ratio is 33.09x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Inno Holdings is 3.41x versus 0.47x for Kaiser Aluminum. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Paramount Gold Nevada has a net margin of -757.27% compared to Inno Holdings's net margin of --. Inno Holdings's return on equity of -105.62% beat Paramount Gold Nevada's return on equity of --.

Inno Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Paramount Gold Nevada has an analysts' consensus of $1.70 which suggests that it could grow by 149.19%. Given that Paramount Gold Nevada has higher upside potential than Inno Holdings, analysts believe Paramount Gold Nevada is more attractive than Inno Holdings.

Inno Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Paramount Gold Nevada has a beta of 1.135, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 13.451%.

Inno Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Paramount Gold Nevada offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Inno Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Paramount Gold Nevada pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Inno Holdings quarterly revenues are $478.1K, which are larger than Paramount Gold Nevada quarterly revenues of --. Inno Holdings's net income of -$3.6M is lower than Paramount Gold Nevada's net income of -$2.6M. Notably, Inno Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Paramount Gold Nevada's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Inno Holdings is 3.41x versus -- for Paramount Gold Nevada. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Solitario Resources has a net margin of -757.27% compared to Inno Holdings's net margin of --. Inno Holdings's return on equity of -105.62% beat Solitario Resources's return on equity of --.

Inno Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Solitario Resources has an analysts' consensus of $1.50 which suggests that it could grow by 128.94%. Given that Solitario Resources has higher upside potential than Inno Holdings, analysts believe Solitario Resources is more attractive than Inno Holdings.

Inno Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Solitario Resources has a beta of 0.465, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 53.534%.

Inno Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Solitario Resources offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Inno Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Solitario Resources pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Inno Holdings quarterly revenues are $478.1K, which are larger than Solitario Resources quarterly revenues of --. Inno Holdings's net income of -$3.6M is lower than Solitario Resources's net income of -$511K. Notably, Inno Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Solitario Resources's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Inno Holdings is 3.41x versus -- for Solitario Resources. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.