IDCC Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Autodesk has a net margin of 26.57% compared to InterDigital's net margin of 17.52%. InterDigital's return on equity of 41.18% beat Autodesk's return on equity of 51.52%.

InterDigital has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -9.26%. On the other hand Autodesk has an analysts' consensus of $327.01 which suggests that it could grow by 8.9%. Given that Autodesk has higher upside potential than InterDigital, analysts believe Autodesk is more attractive than InterDigital.

InterDigital has a beta of 1.440, which suggesting that the stock is 43.97% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Autodesk has a beta of 1.432, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 43.152%.

InterDigital has a quarterly dividend of $0.45 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.85%. Autodesk offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. InterDigital pays 18.43% of its earnings as a dividend. Autodesk pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. InterDigital's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

InterDigital quarterly revenues are $128.7M, which are smaller than Autodesk quarterly revenues of $1.6B. InterDigital's net income of $34.2M is lower than Autodesk's net income of $275M. Notably, InterDigital's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.78x while Autodesk's PE ratio is 59.58x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for InterDigital is 7.68x versus 10.92x for Autodesk. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Alarm.com Holdings has a net margin of 26.57% compared to InterDigital's net margin of 15.25%. InterDigital's return on equity of 41.18% beat Alarm.com Holdings's return on equity of 17.36%.

InterDigital has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -9.26%. On the other hand Alarm.com Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $73.63 which suggests that it could grow by 16.9%. Given that Alarm.com Holdings has higher upside potential than InterDigital, analysts believe Alarm.com Holdings is more attractive than InterDigital.

InterDigital has a beta of 1.440, which suggesting that the stock is 43.97% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Alarm.com Holdings has a beta of 0.967, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.286%.

InterDigital has a quarterly dividend of $0.45 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.85%. Alarm.com Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. InterDigital pays 18.43% of its earnings as a dividend. Alarm.com Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. InterDigital's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

InterDigital quarterly revenues are $128.7M, which are smaller than Alarm.com Holdings quarterly revenues of $240.5M. InterDigital's net income of $34.2M is lower than Alarm.com Holdings's net income of $36.7M. Notably, InterDigital's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.78x while Alarm.com Holdings's PE ratio is 27.15x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for InterDigital is 7.68x versus 3.86x for Alarm.com Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Inuvo has a net margin of 26.57% compared to InterDigital's net margin of -9.14%. InterDigital's return on equity of 41.18% beat Inuvo's return on equity of -54%.

InterDigital has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -9.26%. On the other hand Inuvo has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 118.39%. Given that Inuvo has higher upside potential than InterDigital, analysts believe Inuvo is more attractive than InterDigital.

InterDigital has a beta of 1.440, which suggesting that the stock is 43.97% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Inuvo has a beta of 1.201, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 20.116%.

InterDigital has a quarterly dividend of $0.45 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.85%. Inuvo offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. InterDigital pays 18.43% of its earnings as a dividend. Inuvo pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. InterDigital's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

InterDigital quarterly revenues are $128.7M, which are larger than Inuvo quarterly revenues of $22.4M. InterDigital's net income of $34.2M is higher than Inuvo's net income of -$2M. Notably, InterDigital's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.78x while Inuvo's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for InterDigital is 7.68x versus 0.77x for Inuvo. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Issuer Direct has a net margin of 26.57% compared to InterDigital's net margin of -6.7%. InterDigital's return on equity of 41.18% beat Issuer Direct's return on equity of -3.74%.

InterDigital has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -9.26%. On the other hand Issuer Direct has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 46.89%. Given that Issuer Direct has higher upside potential than InterDigital, analysts believe Issuer Direct is more attractive than InterDigital.

InterDigital has a beta of 1.440, which suggesting that the stock is 43.97% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Issuer Direct has a beta of 0.739, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 26.053%.

InterDigital has a quarterly dividend of $0.45 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.85%. Issuer Direct offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. InterDigital pays 18.43% of its earnings as a dividend. Issuer Direct pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. InterDigital's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

InterDigital quarterly revenues are $128.7M, which are larger than Issuer Direct quarterly revenues of $7M. InterDigital's net income of $34.2M is higher than Issuer Direct's net income of -$466K. Notably, InterDigital's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.78x while Issuer Direct's PE ratio is 57.67x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for InterDigital is 7.68x versus 1.16x for Issuer Direct. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.