HDSN Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Friedman Industries has a net margin of 4.98% compared to Hudson Technologies's net margin of -1.23%. Hudson Technologies's return on equity of 7.13% beat Friedman Industries's return on equity of 4.48%.

Hudson Technologies has a consensus price target of $7.31, signalling upside risk potential of 3.14%. On the other hand Friedman Industries has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Hudson Technologies has higher upside potential than Friedman Industries, analysts believe Hudson Technologies is more attractive than Friedman Industries.

Hudson Technologies has a beta of 0.921, which suggesting that the stock is 7.916% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Friedman Industries has a beta of 1.564, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 56.38%.

Hudson Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Friedman Industries offers a yield of 1% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share. Hudson Technologies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Friedman Industries pays out 3.35% of its earnings as a dividend. Friedman Industries's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Hudson Technologies quarterly revenues are $55.3M, which are smaller than Friedman Industries quarterly revenues of $94.1M. Hudson Technologies's net income of $2.8M is higher than Friedman Industries's net income of -$1.2M. Notably, Hudson Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is 19.16x while Friedman Industries's PE ratio is 19.81x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hudson Technologies is 1.45x versus 0.25x for Friedman Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Kaiser Aluminum has a net margin of 4.98% compared to Hudson Technologies's net margin of 2.78%. Hudson Technologies's return on equity of 7.13% beat Kaiser Aluminum's return on equity of 6.41%.

Hudson Technologies has a consensus price target of $7.31, signalling upside risk potential of 3.14%. On the other hand Kaiser Aluminum has an analysts' consensus of $69.00 which suggests that it could fall by -5.53%. Given that Hudson Technologies has higher upside potential than Kaiser Aluminum, analysts believe Hudson Technologies is more attractive than Kaiser Aluminum.

Hudson Technologies has a beta of 0.921, which suggesting that the stock is 7.916% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kaiser Aluminum has a beta of 1.398, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 39.799%.

Hudson Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Kaiser Aluminum offers a yield of 4.22% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.77 per share. Hudson Technologies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Kaiser Aluminum pays out 108.33% of its earnings as a dividend.

Hudson Technologies quarterly revenues are $55.3M, which are smaller than Kaiser Aluminum quarterly revenues of $777.4M. Hudson Technologies's net income of $2.8M is lower than Kaiser Aluminum's net income of $21.6M. Notably, Hudson Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is 19.16x while Kaiser Aluminum's PE ratio is 27.36x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hudson Technologies is 1.45x versus 0.39x for Kaiser Aluminum. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Paramount Gold Nevada has a net margin of 4.98% compared to Hudson Technologies's net margin of --. Hudson Technologies's return on equity of 7.13% beat Paramount Gold Nevada's return on equity of --.

Hudson Technologies has a consensus price target of $7.31, signalling upside risk potential of 3.14%. On the other hand Paramount Gold Nevada has an analysts' consensus of $1.40 which suggests that it could grow by 169.23%. Given that Paramount Gold Nevada has higher upside potential than Hudson Technologies, analysts believe Paramount Gold Nevada is more attractive than Hudson Technologies.

Hudson Technologies has a beta of 0.921, which suggesting that the stock is 7.916% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Paramount Gold Nevada has a beta of 1.017, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.74%.

Hudson Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Paramount Gold Nevada offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Hudson Technologies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Paramount Gold Nevada pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Hudson Technologies quarterly revenues are $55.3M, which are larger than Paramount Gold Nevada quarterly revenues of --. Hudson Technologies's net income of $2.8M is higher than Paramount Gold Nevada's net income of -$2.6M. Notably, Hudson Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is 19.16x while Paramount Gold Nevada's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hudson Technologies is 1.45x versus -- for Paramount Gold Nevada. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Solitario Resources has a net margin of 4.98% compared to Hudson Technologies's net margin of --. Hudson Technologies's return on equity of 7.13% beat Solitario Resources's return on equity of --.

Hudson Technologies has a consensus price target of $7.31, signalling upside risk potential of 3.14%. On the other hand Solitario Resources has an analysts' consensus of $1.50 which suggests that it could grow by 136.22%. Given that Solitario Resources has higher upside potential than Hudson Technologies, analysts believe Solitario Resources is more attractive than Hudson Technologies.

Hudson Technologies has a beta of 0.921, which suggesting that the stock is 7.916% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Solitario Resources has a beta of 0.498, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 50.16%.

Hudson Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Solitario Resources offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Hudson Technologies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Solitario Resources pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Hudson Technologies quarterly revenues are $55.3M, which are larger than Solitario Resources quarterly revenues of --. Hudson Technologies's net income of $2.8M is higher than Solitario Resources's net income of -$511K. Notably, Hudson Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is 19.16x while Solitario Resources's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hudson Technologies is 1.45x versus -- for Solitario Resources. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.