GPRE Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Gevo has a net margin of 7.32% compared to Green Plains's net margin of -1076.64%. Green Plains's return on equity of -2.17% beat Gevo's return on equity of -14.73%.

Green Plains has a consensus price target of $27.27, signalling upside risk potential of 124.62%. On the other hand Gevo has an analysts' consensus of $6.22 which suggests that it could grow by 311.7%. Given that Gevo has higher upside potential than Green Plains, analysts believe Gevo is more attractive than Green Plains.

Green Plains has a beta of 1.443, which suggesting that the stock is 44.319% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Gevo has a beta of 2.829, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 182.852%.

Green Plains has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Gevo offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Green Plains pays -24.34% of its earnings as a dividend. Gevo pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Green Plains quarterly revenues are $658.7M, which are larger than Gevo quarterly revenues of $2M. Green Plains's net income of $48.2M is higher than Gevo's net income of -$21.2M. Notably, Green Plains's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Gevo's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Green Plains is 0.23x versus 23.24x for Gevo. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Paramount Gold Nevada has a net margin of 7.32% compared to Green Plains's net margin of --. Green Plains's return on equity of -2.17% beat Paramount Gold Nevada's return on equity of --.

Green Plains has a consensus price target of $27.27, signalling upside risk potential of 124.62%. On the other hand Paramount Gold Nevada has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 259.6%. Given that Paramount Gold Nevada has higher upside potential than Green Plains, analysts believe Paramount Gold Nevada is more attractive than Green Plains.

Green Plains has a beta of 1.443, which suggesting that the stock is 44.319% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Paramount Gold Nevada has a beta of 1.854, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 85.435%.

Green Plains has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Paramount Gold Nevada offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Green Plains pays -24.34% of its earnings as a dividend. Paramount Gold Nevada pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Green Plains quarterly revenues are $658.7M, which are larger than Paramount Gold Nevada quarterly revenues of --. Green Plains's net income of $48.2M is higher than Paramount Gold Nevada's net income of -$1.6M. Notably, Green Plains's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Paramount Gold Nevada's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Green Plains is 0.23x versus -- for Paramount Gold Nevada. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

REX American Resources has a net margin of 7.32% compared to Green Plains's net margin of 14.01%. Green Plains's return on equity of -2.17% beat REX American Resources's return on equity of 11.22%.

Green Plains has a consensus price target of $27.27, signalling upside risk potential of 124.62%. On the other hand REX American Resources has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 32.88%. Given that Green Plains has higher upside potential than REX American Resources, analysts believe Green Plains is more attractive than REX American Resources.

Green Plains has a beta of 1.443, which suggesting that the stock is 44.319% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison REX American Resources has a beta of 0.898, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 10.151%.

Green Plains has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. REX American Resources offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Green Plains pays -24.34% of its earnings as a dividend. REX American Resources pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Green Plains quarterly revenues are $658.7M, which are larger than REX American Resources quarterly revenues of $174.9M. Green Plains's net income of $48.2M is higher than REX American Resources's net income of $24.5M. Notably, Green Plains's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while REX American Resources's PE ratio is 10.84x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Green Plains is 0.23x versus 1.09x for REX American Resources. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Solitario Resources has a net margin of 7.32% compared to Green Plains's net margin of --. Green Plains's return on equity of -2.17% beat Solitario Resources's return on equity of --.

Green Plains has a consensus price target of $27.27, signalling upside risk potential of 124.62%. On the other hand Solitario Resources has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 151.21%. Given that Solitario Resources has higher upside potential than Green Plains, analysts believe Solitario Resources is more attractive than Green Plains.

Green Plains has a beta of 1.443, which suggesting that the stock is 44.319% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Solitario Resources has a beta of 0.895, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 10.55%.

Green Plains has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Solitario Resources offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Green Plains pays -24.34% of its earnings as a dividend. Solitario Resources pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Green Plains quarterly revenues are $658.7M, which are larger than Solitario Resources quarterly revenues of --. Green Plains's net income of $48.2M is higher than Solitario Resources's net income of -$2.3M. Notably, Green Plains's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Solitario Resources's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Green Plains is 0.23x versus -- for Solitario Resources. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.