GLRE Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Everest Group has a net margin of 20.95% compared to Greenlight Capital Re's net margin of 11.97%. Greenlight Capital Re's return on equity of 14.2% beat Everest Group's return on equity of 20.5%.

Greenlight Capital Re has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 52.28%. On the other hand Everest Group has an analysts' consensus of $426.09 which suggests that it could grow by 17.49%. Given that Greenlight Capital Re has higher upside potential than Everest Group, analysts believe Greenlight Capital Re is more attractive than Everest Group.

Greenlight Capital Re has a beta of 0.878, which suggesting that the stock is 12.162% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Everest Group has a beta of 0.641, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 35.941%.

Greenlight Capital Re has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Everest Group offers a yield of 2.14% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $2.00 per share. Greenlight Capital Re pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Everest Group pays out 11.44% of its earnings as a dividend. Everest Group's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Greenlight Capital Re quarterly revenues are $168.2M, which are smaller than Everest Group quarterly revenues of $4.3B. Greenlight Capital Re's net income of $35.2M is lower than Everest Group's net income of $509M. Notably, Greenlight Capital Re's price-to-earnings ratio is 5.45x while Everest Group's PE ratio is 5.67x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Greenlight Capital Re is 0.72x versus 0.97x for Everest Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Maiden Holdings has a net margin of 20.95% compared to Greenlight Capital Re's net margin of -402.57%. Greenlight Capital Re's return on equity of 14.2% beat Maiden Holdings's return on equity of -26.39%.

Greenlight Capital Re has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 52.28%. On the other hand Maiden Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 51.52%. Given that Greenlight Capital Re has higher upside potential than Maiden Holdings, analysts believe Greenlight Capital Re is more attractive than Maiden Holdings.

Greenlight Capital Re has a beta of 0.878, which suggesting that the stock is 12.162% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Maiden Holdings has a beta of 1.218, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 21.781%.

Greenlight Capital Re has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Maiden Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Greenlight Capital Re pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Maiden Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Greenlight Capital Re quarterly revenues are $168.2M, which are larger than Maiden Holdings quarterly revenues of $8.6M. Greenlight Capital Re's net income of $35.2M is higher than Maiden Holdings's net income of -$34.5M. Notably, Greenlight Capital Re's price-to-earnings ratio is 5.45x while Maiden Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Greenlight Capital Re is 0.72x versus 1.65x for Maiden Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Oxbridge Re Holdings has a net margin of 20.95% compared to Greenlight Capital Re's net margin of -142.93%. Greenlight Capital Re's return on equity of 14.2% beat Oxbridge Re Holdings's return on equity of -79.13%.

Greenlight Capital Re has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 52.28%. On the other hand Oxbridge Re Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 115.19%. Given that Oxbridge Re Holdings has higher upside potential than Greenlight Capital Re, analysts believe Oxbridge Re Holdings is more attractive than Greenlight Capital Re.

Greenlight Capital Re has a beta of 0.878, which suggesting that the stock is 12.162% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Oxbridge Re Holdings has a beta of 0.980, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 2.029%.

Greenlight Capital Re has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Oxbridge Re Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Greenlight Capital Re pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Oxbridge Re Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Greenlight Capital Re quarterly revenues are $168.2M, which are larger than Oxbridge Re Holdings quarterly revenues of $205K. Greenlight Capital Re's net income of $35.2M is higher than Oxbridge Re Holdings's net income of -$293K. Notably, Greenlight Capital Re's price-to-earnings ratio is 5.45x while Oxbridge Re Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Greenlight Capital Re is 0.72x versus -- for Oxbridge Re Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Patria Investments has a net margin of 20.95% compared to Greenlight Capital Re's net margin of 1.92%. Greenlight Capital Re's return on equity of 14.2% beat Patria Investments's return on equity of 13.05%.

Greenlight Capital Re has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 52.28%. On the other hand Patria Investments has an analysts' consensus of $16.00 which suggests that it could grow by 39.01%. Given that Greenlight Capital Re has higher upside potential than Patria Investments, analysts believe Greenlight Capital Re is more attractive than Patria Investments.

Greenlight Capital Re has a beta of 0.878, which suggesting that the stock is 12.162% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Patria Investments has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Greenlight Capital Re has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Patria Investments offers a yield of 7.59% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share. Greenlight Capital Re pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Patria Investments pays out 122.59% of its earnings as a dividend.

Greenlight Capital Re quarterly revenues are $168.2M, which are larger than Patria Investments quarterly revenues of $78M. Greenlight Capital Re's net income of $35.2M is higher than Patria Investments's net income of $1.5M. Notably, Greenlight Capital Re's price-to-earnings ratio is 5.45x while Patria Investments's PE ratio is 26.58x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Greenlight Capital Re is 0.72x versus 5.31x for Patria Investments. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.