PAX Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Diamond Hill Investment Group has a net margin of 17.06% compared to Patria Investments's net margin of 24.7%. Patria Investments's return on equity of 13.9% beat Diamond Hill Investment Group's return on equity of 24.93%.

Patria Investments has a consensus price target of $14.92, signalling upside risk potential of 9.2%. On the other hand Diamond Hill Investment Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Patria Investments has higher upside potential than Diamond Hill Investment Group, analysts believe Patria Investments is more attractive than Diamond Hill Investment Group.

Patria Investments has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Diamond Hill Investment Group has a beta of 0.797, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 20.343%.

Patria Investments has a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.49%. Diamond Hill Investment Group offers a yield of 3.89% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.50 per share. Patria Investments pays 184.19% of its earnings as a dividend. Diamond Hill Investment Group pays out 38.29% of its earnings as a dividend. Diamond Hill Investment Group's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Patria Investments's is not.

Patria Investments quarterly revenues are $79.7M, which are larger than Diamond Hill Investment Group quarterly revenues of $42M. Patria Investments's net income of $13.6M is higher than Diamond Hill Investment Group's net income of $10.4M. Notably, Patria Investments's price-to-earnings ratio is 29.47x while Diamond Hill Investment Group's PE ratio is 10.43x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Patria Investments is 5.47x versus 2.76x for Diamond Hill Investment Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Greenlight Capital Re has a net margin of 17.06% compared to Patria Investments's net margin of 16.5%. Patria Investments's return on equity of 13.9% beat Greenlight Capital Re's return on equity of 7.04%.

Patria Investments has a consensus price target of $14.92, signalling upside risk potential of 9.2%. On the other hand Greenlight Capital Re has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 57.78%. Given that Greenlight Capital Re has higher upside potential than Patria Investments, analysts believe Greenlight Capital Re is more attractive than Patria Investments.

Patria Investments has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Greenlight Capital Re has a beta of 0.660, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 34.042%.

Patria Investments has a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.49%. Greenlight Capital Re offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Patria Investments pays 184.19% of its earnings as a dividend. Greenlight Capital Re pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Patria Investments quarterly revenues are $79.7M, which are smaller than Greenlight Capital Re quarterly revenues of $179.6M. Patria Investments's net income of $13.6M is lower than Greenlight Capital Re's net income of $29.6M. Notably, Patria Investments's price-to-earnings ratio is 29.47x while Greenlight Capital Re's PE ratio is 10.32x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Patria Investments is 5.47x versus 0.70x for Greenlight Capital Re. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

MidCap Financial Investment has a net margin of 17.06% compared to Patria Investments's net margin of 95.41%. Patria Investments's return on equity of 13.9% beat MidCap Financial Investment's return on equity of 8.33%.

Patria Investments has a consensus price target of $14.92, signalling upside risk potential of 9.2%. On the other hand MidCap Financial Investment has an analysts' consensus of $13.88 which suggests that it could grow by 5.43%. Given that Patria Investments has higher upside potential than MidCap Financial Investment, analysts believe Patria Investments is more attractive than MidCap Financial Investment.

Patria Investments has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison MidCap Financial Investment has a beta of 0.977, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 2.263%.

Patria Investments has a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.49%. MidCap Financial Investment offers a yield of 11.55% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.38 per share. Patria Investments pays 184.19% of its earnings as a dividend. MidCap Financial Investment pays out 141.29% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Patria Investments quarterly revenues are $79.7M, which are larger than MidCap Financial Investment quarterly revenues of $31.8M. Patria Investments's net income of $13.6M is lower than MidCap Financial Investment's net income of $30.3M. Notably, Patria Investments's price-to-earnings ratio is 29.47x while MidCap Financial Investment's PE ratio is 10.79x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Patria Investments is 5.47x versus 9.87x for MidCap Financial Investment. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Oaktree Specialty Lending has a net margin of 17.06% compared to Patria Investments's net margin of 90.2%. Patria Investments's return on equity of 13.9% beat Oaktree Specialty Lending's return on equity of 0.61%.

Patria Investments has a consensus price target of $14.92, signalling upside risk potential of 9.2%. On the other hand Oaktree Specialty Lending has an analysts' consensus of $14.08 which suggests that it could fall by -2.27%. Given that Patria Investments has higher upside potential than Oaktree Specialty Lending, analysts believe Patria Investments is more attractive than Oaktree Specialty Lending.

Patria Investments has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Oaktree Specialty Lending has a beta of 0.686, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 31.445%.

Patria Investments has a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.49%. Oaktree Specialty Lending offers a yield of 13.81% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.42 per share. Patria Investments pays 184.19% of its earnings as a dividend. Oaktree Specialty Lending pays out 305.35% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Patria Investments quarterly revenues are $79.7M, which are larger than Oaktree Specialty Lending quarterly revenues of -$40.2M. Patria Investments's net income of $13.6M is higher than Oaktree Specialty Lending's net income of -$36.2M. Notably, Patria Investments's price-to-earnings ratio is 29.47x while Oaktree Specialty Lending's PE ratio is 110.85x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Patria Investments is 5.47x versus 22.13x for Oaktree Specialty Lending. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.