EG Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Conduit Holdings has a net margin of 4.96% compared to Everest Group's net margin of --. Everest Group's return on equity of 5.97% beat Conduit Holdings's return on equity of 12.2%.

Everest Group has a consensus price target of $397.42, signalling upside risk potential of 16.19%. On the other hand Conduit Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Everest Group has higher upside potential than Conduit Holdings, analysts believe Everest Group is more attractive than Conduit Holdings.

Everest Group has a beta of 0.582, which suggesting that the stock is 41.791% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Conduit Holdings has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Everest Group has a quarterly dividend of $2.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.34%. Conduit Holdings offers a yield of 5.81% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share. Everest Group pays 24.33% of its earnings as a dividend. Conduit Holdings pays out 47.37% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Everest Group quarterly revenues are $4.2B, which are larger than Conduit Holdings quarterly revenues of --. Everest Group's net income of $210M is higher than Conduit Holdings's net income of --. Notably, Everest Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.60x while Conduit Holdings's PE ratio is 7.85x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Everest Group is 0.84x versus 1.32x for Conduit Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Enstar Group has a net margin of 4.96% compared to Everest Group's net margin of 32.78%. Everest Group's return on equity of 5.97% beat Enstar Group's return on equity of 8.44%.

Everest Group has a consensus price target of $397.42, signalling upside risk potential of 16.19%. On the other hand Enstar Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -70.07%. Given that Everest Group has higher upside potential than Enstar Group, analysts believe Everest Group is more attractive than Enstar Group.

Everest Group has a beta of 0.582, which suggesting that the stock is 41.791% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Enstar Group has a beta of 0.713, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 28.743%.

Everest Group has a quarterly dividend of $2.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.34%. Enstar Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Everest Group pays 24.33% of its earnings as a dividend. Enstar Group pays out 6.25% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Everest Group quarterly revenues are $4.2B, which are larger than Enstar Group quarterly revenues of $180M. Everest Group's net income of $210M is higher than Enstar Group's net income of $59M. Notably, Everest Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.60x while Enstar Group's PE ratio is 10.64x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Everest Group is 0.84x versus 4.42x for Enstar Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Hamilton Insurance Group has a net margin of 4.96% compared to Everest Group's net margin of 5.82%. Everest Group's return on equity of 5.97% beat Hamilton Insurance Group's return on equity of 17.67%.

Everest Group has a consensus price target of $397.42, signalling upside risk potential of 16.19%. On the other hand Hamilton Insurance Group has an analysts' consensus of $22.83 which suggests that it could grow by 18.86%. Given that Hamilton Insurance Group has higher upside potential than Everest Group, analysts believe Hamilton Insurance Group is more attractive than Everest Group.

Everest Group has a beta of 0.582, which suggesting that the stock is 41.791% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hamilton Insurance Group has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Everest Group has a quarterly dividend of $2.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.34%. Hamilton Insurance Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Everest Group pays 24.33% of its earnings as a dividend. Hamilton Insurance Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Everest Group's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Everest Group quarterly revenues are $4.2B, which are larger than Hamilton Insurance Group quarterly revenues of $583M. Everest Group's net income of $210M is higher than Hamilton Insurance Group's net income of $33.9M. Notably, Everest Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.60x while Hamilton Insurance Group's PE ratio is 5.28x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Everest Group is 0.84x versus 0.88x for Hamilton Insurance Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Maiden Holdings has a net margin of 4.96% compared to Everest Group's net margin of -570.56%. Everest Group's return on equity of 5.97% beat Maiden Holdings's return on equity of -101.51%.

Everest Group has a consensus price target of $397.42, signalling upside risk potential of 16.19%. On the other hand Maiden Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 57.48%. Given that Maiden Holdings has higher upside potential than Everest Group, analysts believe Maiden Holdings is more attractive than Everest Group.

Everest Group has a beta of 0.582, which suggesting that the stock is 41.791% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Maiden Holdings has a beta of 1.315, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 31.533%.

Everest Group has a quarterly dividend of $2.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.34%. Maiden Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Everest Group pays 24.33% of its earnings as a dividend. Maiden Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Everest Group's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Everest Group quarterly revenues are $4.2B, which are larger than Maiden Holdings quarterly revenues of $27.7M. Everest Group's net income of $210M is higher than Maiden Holdings's net income of -$158M. Notably, Everest Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.60x while Maiden Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Everest Group is 0.84x versus 1.45x for Maiden Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.