EG Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Enstar Group has a net margin of 11.97% compared to Everest Group's net margin of 40.78%. Everest Group's return on equity of 20.5% beat Enstar Group's return on equity of 18.07%.

Everest Group has a consensus price target of $426.09, signalling upside risk potential of 17.49%. On the other hand Enstar Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -68.96%. Given that Everest Group has higher upside potential than Enstar Group, analysts believe Everest Group is more attractive than Enstar Group.

Everest Group has a beta of 0.641, which suggesting that the stock is 35.941% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Enstar Group has a beta of 0.646, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 35.446%.

Everest Group has a quarterly dividend of $2.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.14%. Enstar Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Everest Group pays 11.44% of its earnings as a dividend. Enstar Group pays out 3.22% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Everest Group quarterly revenues are $4.3B, which are larger than Enstar Group quarterly revenues of $385M. Everest Group's net income of $509M is higher than Enstar Group's net income of $157M. Notably, Everest Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 5.67x while Enstar Group's PE ratio is 4.88x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Everest Group is 0.97x versus 3.67x for Enstar Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Hamilton Insurance Group has a net margin of 11.97% compared to Everest Group's net margin of 14.9%. Everest Group's return on equity of 20.5% beat Hamilton Insurance Group's return on equity of 22.84%.

Everest Group has a consensus price target of $426.09, signalling upside risk potential of 17.49%. On the other hand Hamilton Insurance Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 21.37%. Given that Hamilton Insurance Group has higher upside potential than Everest Group, analysts believe Hamilton Insurance Group is more attractive than Everest Group.

Everest Group has a beta of 0.641, which suggesting that the stock is 35.941% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hamilton Insurance Group has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Everest Group has a quarterly dividend of $2.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.14%. Hamilton Insurance Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Everest Group pays 11.44% of its earnings as a dividend. Hamilton Insurance Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Everest Group's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Everest Group quarterly revenues are $4.3B, which are larger than Hamilton Insurance Group quarterly revenues of $525.1M. Everest Group's net income of $509M is higher than Hamilton Insurance Group's net income of $78.3M. Notably, Everest Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 5.67x while Hamilton Insurance Group's PE ratio is 4.24x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Everest Group is 0.97x versus 0.91x for Hamilton Insurance Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Maiden Holdings has a net margin of 11.97% compared to Everest Group's net margin of -402.57%. Everest Group's return on equity of 20.5% beat Maiden Holdings's return on equity of -26.39%.

Everest Group has a consensus price target of $426.09, signalling upside risk potential of 17.49%. On the other hand Maiden Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 51.52%. Given that Maiden Holdings has higher upside potential than Everest Group, analysts believe Maiden Holdings is more attractive than Everest Group.

Everest Group has a beta of 0.641, which suggesting that the stock is 35.941% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Maiden Holdings has a beta of 1.218, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 21.781%.

Everest Group has a quarterly dividend of $2.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.14%. Maiden Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Everest Group pays 11.44% of its earnings as a dividend. Maiden Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Everest Group's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Everest Group quarterly revenues are $4.3B, which are larger than Maiden Holdings quarterly revenues of $8.6M. Everest Group's net income of $509M is higher than Maiden Holdings's net income of -$34.5M. Notably, Everest Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 5.67x while Maiden Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Everest Group is 0.97x versus 1.65x for Maiden Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

RenaissanceRe Holdings has a net margin of 11.97% compared to Everest Group's net margin of 29.8%. Everest Group's return on equity of 20.5% beat RenaissanceRe Holdings's return on equity of 22.92%.

Everest Group has a consensus price target of $426.09, signalling upside risk potential of 17.49%. On the other hand RenaissanceRe Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $294.18 which suggests that it could grow by 17.7%. Given that RenaissanceRe Holdings has higher upside potential than Everest Group, analysts believe RenaissanceRe Holdings is more attractive than Everest Group.

Everest Group has a beta of 0.641, which suggesting that the stock is 35.941% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison RenaissanceRe Holdings has a beta of 0.410, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 59.003%.

Everest Group has a quarterly dividend of $2.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.14%. RenaissanceRe Holdings offers a yield of 0.62% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.39 per share. Everest Group pays 11.44% of its earnings as a dividend. RenaissanceRe Holdings pays out 4.31% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Everest Group quarterly revenues are $4.3B, which are larger than RenaissanceRe Holdings quarterly revenues of $4B. Everest Group's net income of $509M is lower than RenaissanceRe Holdings's net income of $1.2B. Notably, Everest Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 5.67x while RenaissanceRe Holdings's PE ratio is 3.60x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Everest Group is 0.97x versus 1.02x for RenaissanceRe Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.