FKWL Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Ciena has a net margin of -8.05% compared to Franklin Wireless's net margin of 0.8%. Franklin Wireless's return on equity of -4.45% beat Ciena's return on equity of 3.7%.

Franklin Wireless has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 283.69%. On the other hand Ciena has an analysts' consensus of $84.07 which suggests that it could grow by 16.03%. Given that Franklin Wireless has higher upside potential than Ciena, analysts believe Franklin Wireless is more attractive than Ciena.

Franklin Wireless has a beta of 0.468, which suggesting that the stock is 53.171% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ciena has a beta of 1.119, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 11.893%.

Franklin Wireless has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Ciena offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Franklin Wireless pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ciena pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Franklin Wireless quarterly revenues are $8M, which are smaller than Ciena quarterly revenues of $1.1B. Franklin Wireless's net income of -$644.8K is lower than Ciena's net income of $9M. Notably, Franklin Wireless's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Ciena's PE ratio is 100.64x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Franklin Wireless is 1.09x versus 2.48x for Ciena. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Clearfield has a net margin of -8.05% compared to Franklin Wireless's net margin of 2.81%. Franklin Wireless's return on equity of -4.45% beat Clearfield's return on equity of -0.68%.

Franklin Wireless has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 283.69%. On the other hand Clearfield has an analysts' consensus of $46.00 which suggests that it could grow by 17.65%. Given that Franklin Wireless has higher upside potential than Clearfield, analysts believe Franklin Wireless is more attractive than Clearfield.

Franklin Wireless has a beta of 0.468, which suggesting that the stock is 53.171% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Clearfield has a beta of 1.686, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 68.581%.

Franklin Wireless has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Clearfield offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Franklin Wireless pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Clearfield pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Franklin Wireless quarterly revenues are $8M, which are smaller than Clearfield quarterly revenues of $47.2M. Franklin Wireless's net income of -$644.8K is lower than Clearfield's net income of $1.3M. Notably, Franklin Wireless's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Clearfield's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Franklin Wireless is 1.09x versus 3.12x for Clearfield. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Netgear has a net margin of -8.05% compared to Franklin Wireless's net margin of -3.72%. Franklin Wireless's return on equity of -4.45% beat Netgear's return on equity of 4.81%.

Franklin Wireless has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 283.69%. On the other hand Netgear has an analysts' consensus of $29.00 which suggests that it could fall by -3.88%. Given that Franklin Wireless has higher upside potential than Netgear, analysts believe Franklin Wireless is more attractive than Netgear.

Franklin Wireless has a beta of 0.468, which suggesting that the stock is 53.171% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Netgear has a beta of 1.144, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 14.438%.

Franklin Wireless has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Netgear offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Franklin Wireless pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Netgear pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Franklin Wireless quarterly revenues are $8M, which are smaller than Netgear quarterly revenues of $162.1M. Franklin Wireless's net income of -$644.8K is higher than Netgear's net income of -$6M. Notably, Franklin Wireless's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Netgear's PE ratio is 36.79x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Franklin Wireless is 1.09x versus 1.32x for Netgear. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Westell Technologies has a net margin of -8.05% compared to Franklin Wireless's net margin of --. Franklin Wireless's return on equity of -4.45% beat Westell Technologies's return on equity of --.

Franklin Wireless has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 283.69%. On the other hand Westell Technologies has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Franklin Wireless has higher upside potential than Westell Technologies, analysts believe Franklin Wireless is more attractive than Westell Technologies.

Franklin Wireless has a beta of 0.468, which suggesting that the stock is 53.171% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Westell Technologies has a beta of 0.356, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 64.428%.

Franklin Wireless has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Westell Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Franklin Wireless pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Westell Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Franklin Wireless quarterly revenues are $8M, which are larger than Westell Technologies quarterly revenues of --. Franklin Wireless's net income of -$644.8K is higher than Westell Technologies's net income of --. Notably, Franklin Wireless's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Westell Technologies's PE ratio is 16.25x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Franklin Wireless is 1.09x versus 0.94x for Westell Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.