CLFD Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Ciena has a net margin of 2.81% compared to Clearfield's net margin of 0.8%. Clearfield's return on equity of -0.68% beat Ciena's return on equity of 3.7%.

Clearfield has a consensus price target of $46.00, signalling upside risk potential of 17.65%. On the other hand Ciena has an analysts' consensus of $84.07 which suggests that it could grow by 16.03%. Given that Clearfield has higher upside potential than Ciena, analysts believe Clearfield is more attractive than Ciena.

Clearfield has a beta of 1.686, which suggesting that the stock is 68.581% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ciena has a beta of 1.119, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 11.893%.

Clearfield has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Ciena offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Clearfield pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ciena pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Clearfield quarterly revenues are $47.2M, which are smaller than Ciena quarterly revenues of $1.1B. Clearfield's net income of $1.3M is lower than Ciena's net income of $9M. Notably, Clearfield's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Ciena's PE ratio is 100.64x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Clearfield is 3.12x versus 2.48x for Ciena. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Franklin Wireless has a net margin of 2.81% compared to Clearfield's net margin of -8.05%. Clearfield's return on equity of -0.68% beat Franklin Wireless's return on equity of -4.45%.

Clearfield has a consensus price target of $46.00, signalling upside risk potential of 17.65%. On the other hand Franklin Wireless has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 283.69%. Given that Franklin Wireless has higher upside potential than Clearfield, analysts believe Franklin Wireless is more attractive than Clearfield.

Clearfield has a beta of 1.686, which suggesting that the stock is 68.581% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Franklin Wireless has a beta of 0.468, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 53.171%.

Clearfield has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Franklin Wireless offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Clearfield pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Franklin Wireless pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Clearfield quarterly revenues are $47.2M, which are larger than Franklin Wireless quarterly revenues of $8M. Clearfield's net income of $1.3M is higher than Franklin Wireless's net income of -$644.8K. Notably, Clearfield's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Franklin Wireless's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Clearfield is 3.12x versus 1.09x for Franklin Wireless. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Netgear has a net margin of 2.81% compared to Clearfield's net margin of -3.72%. Clearfield's return on equity of -0.68% beat Netgear's return on equity of 4.81%.

Clearfield has a consensus price target of $46.00, signalling upside risk potential of 17.65%. On the other hand Netgear has an analysts' consensus of $29.00 which suggests that it could fall by -3.88%. Given that Clearfield has higher upside potential than Netgear, analysts believe Clearfield is more attractive than Netgear.

Clearfield has a beta of 1.686, which suggesting that the stock is 68.581% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Netgear has a beta of 1.144, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 14.438%.

Clearfield has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Netgear offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Clearfield pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Netgear pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Clearfield quarterly revenues are $47.2M, which are smaller than Netgear quarterly revenues of $162.1M. Clearfield's net income of $1.3M is higher than Netgear's net income of -$6M. Notably, Clearfield's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Netgear's PE ratio is 36.79x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Clearfield is 3.12x versus 1.32x for Netgear. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Westell Technologies has a net margin of 2.81% compared to Clearfield's net margin of --. Clearfield's return on equity of -0.68% beat Westell Technologies's return on equity of --.

Clearfield has a consensus price target of $46.00, signalling upside risk potential of 17.65%. On the other hand Westell Technologies has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Clearfield has higher upside potential than Westell Technologies, analysts believe Clearfield is more attractive than Westell Technologies.

Clearfield has a beta of 1.686, which suggesting that the stock is 68.581% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Westell Technologies has a beta of 0.356, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 64.428%.

Clearfield has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Westell Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Clearfield pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Westell Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Clearfield quarterly revenues are $47.2M, which are larger than Westell Technologies quarterly revenues of --. Clearfield's net income of $1.3M is higher than Westell Technologies's net income of --. Notably, Clearfield's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Westell Technologies's PE ratio is 16.25x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Clearfield is 3.12x versus 0.94x for Westell Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.