ESQ Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Capital City Bank Group has a net margin of 33.79% compared to Esquire Financial Holdings's net margin of 28.58%. Esquire Financial Holdings's return on equity of 19.66% beat Capital City Bank Group's return on equity of 11.85%.

Esquire Financial Holdings has a consensus price target of $100.50, signalling upside risk potential of 2.93%. On the other hand Capital City Bank Group has an analysts' consensus of $42.67 which suggests that it could grow by 5.64%. Given that Capital City Bank Group has higher upside potential than Esquire Financial Holdings, analysts believe Capital City Bank Group is more attractive than Esquire Financial Holdings.

Esquire Financial Holdings has a beta of 0.525, which suggesting that the stock is 47.503% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Capital City Bank Group has a beta of 0.362, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 63.793%.

Esquire Financial Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.67%. Capital City Bank Group offers a yield of 2.33% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share. Esquire Financial Holdings pays 11.1% of its earnings as a dividend. Capital City Bank Group pays out 28.17% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Esquire Financial Holdings quarterly revenues are $33.8M, which are smaller than Capital City Bank Group quarterly revenues of $59M. Esquire Financial Holdings's net income of $11.4M is lower than Capital City Bank Group's net income of $16.9M. Notably, Esquire Financial Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.46x while Capital City Bank Group's PE ratio is 12.02x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Esquire Financial Holdings is 6.44x versus 2.97x for Capital City Bank Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Citizens & Northern has a net margin of 33.79% compared to Esquire Financial Holdings's net margin of 23.66%. Esquire Financial Holdings's return on equity of 19.66% beat Citizens & Northern's return on equity of 9.91%.

Esquire Financial Holdings has a consensus price target of $100.50, signalling upside risk potential of 2.93%. On the other hand Citizens & Northern has an analysts' consensus of $21.00 which suggests that it could grow by 5.63%. Given that Citizens & Northern has higher upside potential than Esquire Financial Holdings, analysts believe Citizens & Northern is more attractive than Esquire Financial Holdings.

Esquire Financial Holdings has a beta of 0.525, which suggesting that the stock is 47.503% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Citizens & Northern has a beta of 0.493, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 50.694%.

Esquire Financial Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.67%. Citizens & Northern offers a yield of 5.63% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share. Esquire Financial Holdings pays 11.1% of its earnings as a dividend. Citizens & Northern pays out 59.83% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Esquire Financial Holdings quarterly revenues are $33.8M, which are larger than Citizens & Northern quarterly revenues of $26.6M. Esquire Financial Holdings's net income of $11.4M is higher than Citizens & Northern's net income of $6.3M. Notably, Esquire Financial Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.46x while Citizens & Northern's PE ratio is 11.36x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Esquire Financial Holdings is 6.44x versus 2.82x for Citizens & Northern. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Park National has a net margin of 33.79% compared to Esquire Financial Holdings's net margin of 32.4%. Esquire Financial Holdings's return on equity of 19.66% beat Park National's return on equity of 12.97%.

Esquire Financial Holdings has a consensus price target of $100.50, signalling upside risk potential of 2.93%. On the other hand Park National has an analysts' consensus of $172.67 which suggests that it could fall by -1.97%. Given that Esquire Financial Holdings has higher upside potential than Park National, analysts believe Esquire Financial Holdings is more attractive than Park National.

Esquire Financial Holdings has a beta of 0.525, which suggesting that the stock is 47.503% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Park National has a beta of 0.821, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 17.866%.

Esquire Financial Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.67%. Park National offers a yield of 2.42% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.07 per share. Esquire Financial Holdings pays 11.1% of its earnings as a dividend. Park National pays out 51.18% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Esquire Financial Holdings quarterly revenues are $33.8M, which are smaller than Park National quarterly revenues of $130.1M. Esquire Financial Holdings's net income of $11.4M is lower than Park National's net income of $42.2M. Notably, Esquire Financial Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.46x while Park National's PE ratio is 18.08x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Esquire Financial Holdings is 6.44x versus 5.41x for Park National. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tompkins Financial has a net margin of 33.79% compared to Esquire Financial Holdings's net margin of 24.09%. Esquire Financial Holdings's return on equity of 19.66% beat Tompkins Financial's return on equity of 10.46%.

Esquire Financial Holdings has a consensus price target of $100.50, signalling upside risk potential of 2.93%. On the other hand Tompkins Financial has an analysts' consensus of $72.50 which suggests that it could grow by 8.5%. Given that Tompkins Financial has higher upside potential than Esquire Financial Holdings, analysts believe Tompkins Financial is more attractive than Esquire Financial Holdings.

Esquire Financial Holdings has a beta of 0.525, which suggesting that the stock is 47.503% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tompkins Financial has a beta of 0.902, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 9.793%.

Esquire Financial Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.67%. Tompkins Financial offers a yield of 3.7% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.62 per share. Esquire Financial Holdings pays 11.1% of its earnings as a dividend. Tompkins Financial pays out 49.47% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Esquire Financial Holdings quarterly revenues are $33.8M, which are smaller than Tompkins Financial quarterly revenues of $81.7M. Esquire Financial Holdings's net income of $11.4M is lower than Tompkins Financial's net income of $19.7M. Notably, Esquire Financial Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.46x while Tompkins Financial's PE ratio is 13.00x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Esquire Financial Holdings is 6.44x versus 3.13x for Tompkins Financial. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.