ERII Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

GenFlat Holdings has a net margin of -122.51% compared to Energy Recovery's net margin of -22345.34%. Energy Recovery's return on equity of 9.95% beat GenFlat Holdings's return on equity of -222.37%.

Energy Recovery has a consensus price target of $14.50, signalling upside risk potential of 16.84%. On the other hand GenFlat Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Energy Recovery has higher upside potential than GenFlat Holdings, analysts believe Energy Recovery is more attractive than GenFlat Holdings.

Energy Recovery has a beta of 1.022, which suggesting that the stock is 2.208% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison GenFlat Holdings has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Energy Recovery has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. GenFlat Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Energy Recovery pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. GenFlat Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Energy Recovery quarterly revenues are $8.1M, which are larger than GenFlat Holdings quarterly revenues of $7.9K. Energy Recovery's net income of -$9.9M is lower than GenFlat Holdings's net income of -$554.7K. Notably, Energy Recovery's price-to-earnings ratio is 33.54x while GenFlat Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Energy Recovery is 5.06x versus -- for GenFlat Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Mueller Water Products has a net margin of -122.51% compared to Energy Recovery's net margin of 14.08%. Energy Recovery's return on equity of 9.95% beat Mueller Water Products's return on equity of 17.71%.

Energy Recovery has a consensus price target of $14.50, signalling upside risk potential of 16.84%. On the other hand Mueller Water Products has an analysts' consensus of $28.33 which suggests that it could grow by 16.79%. Given that Energy Recovery has higher upside potential than Mueller Water Products, analysts believe Energy Recovery is more attractive than Mueller Water Products.

Energy Recovery has a beta of 1.022, which suggesting that the stock is 2.208% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Mueller Water Products has a beta of 1.207, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 20.674%.

Energy Recovery has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Mueller Water Products offers a yield of 1.09% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share. Energy Recovery pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Mueller Water Products pays out 34.43% of its earnings as a dividend. Mueller Water Products's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Energy Recovery quarterly revenues are $8.1M, which are smaller than Mueller Water Products quarterly revenues of $364.3M. Energy Recovery's net income of -$9.9M is lower than Mueller Water Products's net income of $51.3M. Notably, Energy Recovery's price-to-earnings ratio is 33.54x while Mueller Water Products's PE ratio is 26.66x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Energy Recovery is 5.06x versus 2.78x for Mueller Water Products. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tennant has a net margin of -122.51% compared to Energy Recovery's net margin of 4.52%. Energy Recovery's return on equity of 9.95% beat Tennant's return on equity of 10.9%.

Energy Recovery has a consensus price target of $14.50, signalling upside risk potential of 16.84%. On the other hand Tennant has an analysts' consensus of $120.00 which suggests that it could grow by 54.62%. Given that Tennant has higher upside potential than Energy Recovery, analysts believe Tennant is more attractive than Energy Recovery.

Energy Recovery has a beta of 1.022, which suggesting that the stock is 2.208% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tennant has a beta of 1.048, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 4.817%.

Energy Recovery has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Tennant offers a yield of 1.5% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share. Energy Recovery pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Tennant pays out 25.57% of its earnings as a dividend. Tennant's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Energy Recovery quarterly revenues are $8.1M, which are smaller than Tennant quarterly revenues of $290M. Energy Recovery's net income of -$9.9M is lower than Tennant's net income of $13.1M. Notably, Energy Recovery's price-to-earnings ratio is 33.54x while Tennant's PE ratio is 21.68x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Energy Recovery is 5.06x versus 1.17x for Tennant. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Watts Water Technologies has a net margin of -122.51% compared to Energy Recovery's net margin of 13.26%. Energy Recovery's return on equity of 9.95% beat Watts Water Technologies's return on equity of 17.55%.

Energy Recovery has a consensus price target of $14.50, signalling upside risk potential of 16.84%. On the other hand Watts Water Technologies has an analysts' consensus of $233.80 which suggests that it could fall by -4.19%. Given that Energy Recovery has higher upside potential than Watts Water Technologies, analysts believe Energy Recovery is more attractive than Watts Water Technologies.

Energy Recovery has a beta of 1.022, which suggesting that the stock is 2.208% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Watts Water Technologies has a beta of 1.129, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 12.87%.

Energy Recovery has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Watts Water Technologies offers a yield of 0.74% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.52 per share. Energy Recovery pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Watts Water Technologies pays out 19.06% of its earnings as a dividend. Watts Water Technologies's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Energy Recovery quarterly revenues are $8.1M, which are smaller than Watts Water Technologies quarterly revenues of $558M. Energy Recovery's net income of -$9.9M is lower than Watts Water Technologies's net income of $74M. Notably, Energy Recovery's price-to-earnings ratio is 33.54x while Watts Water Technologies's PE ratio is 27.95x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Energy Recovery is 5.06x versus 3.65x for Watts Water Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.