WTS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Ingersoll Rand has a net margin of 13.26% compared to Watts Water Technologies's net margin of 10.86%. Watts Water Technologies's return on equity of 17.55% beat Ingersoll Rand's return on equity of 8.06%.

Watts Water Technologies has a consensus price target of $230.80, signalling downside risk potential of -4.68%. On the other hand Ingersoll Rand has an analysts' consensus of $89.23 which suggests that it could grow by 9.3%. Given that Ingersoll Rand has higher upside potential than Watts Water Technologies, analysts believe Ingersoll Rand is more attractive than Watts Water Technologies.

Watts Water Technologies has a beta of 1.081, which suggesting that the stock is 8.06% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ingersoll Rand has a beta of 1.418, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 41.824%.

Watts Water Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.52 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.75%. Ingersoll Rand offers a yield of 0.1% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share. Watts Water Technologies pays 19.06% of its earnings as a dividend. Ingersoll Rand pays out 3.85% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Watts Water Technologies quarterly revenues are $558M, which are smaller than Ingersoll Rand quarterly revenues of $1.7B. Watts Water Technologies's net income of $74M is lower than Ingersoll Rand's net income of $186.5M. Notably, Watts Water Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is 27.73x while Ingersoll Rand's PE ratio is 40.42x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Watts Water Technologies is 3.62x versus 4.56x for Ingersoll Rand. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Mueller Water Products has a net margin of 13.26% compared to Watts Water Technologies's net margin of 14.08%. Watts Water Technologies's return on equity of 17.55% beat Mueller Water Products's return on equity of 17.71%.

Watts Water Technologies has a consensus price target of $230.80, signalling downside risk potential of -4.68%. On the other hand Mueller Water Products has an analysts' consensus of $28.17 which suggests that it could grow by 15.51%. Given that Mueller Water Products has higher upside potential than Watts Water Technologies, analysts believe Mueller Water Products is more attractive than Watts Water Technologies.

Watts Water Technologies has a beta of 1.081, which suggesting that the stock is 8.06% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Mueller Water Products has a beta of 1.243, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 24.304%.

Watts Water Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.52 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.75%. Mueller Water Products offers a yield of 1.08% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share. Watts Water Technologies pays 19.06% of its earnings as a dividend. Mueller Water Products pays out 34.43% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Watts Water Technologies quarterly revenues are $558M, which are larger than Mueller Water Products quarterly revenues of $364.3M. Watts Water Technologies's net income of $74M is higher than Mueller Water Products's net income of $51.3M. Notably, Watts Water Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is 27.73x while Mueller Water Products's PE ratio is 26.96x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Watts Water Technologies is 3.62x versus 2.81x for Mueller Water Products. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tennant has a net margin of 13.26% compared to Watts Water Technologies's net margin of 4.52%. Watts Water Technologies's return on equity of 17.55% beat Tennant's return on equity of 10.9%.

Watts Water Technologies has a consensus price target of $230.80, signalling downside risk potential of -4.68%. On the other hand Tennant has an analysts' consensus of $120.00 which suggests that it could grow by 61.25%. Given that Tennant has higher upside potential than Watts Water Technologies, analysts believe Tennant is more attractive than Watts Water Technologies.

Watts Water Technologies has a beta of 1.081, which suggesting that the stock is 8.06% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tennant has a beta of 1.068, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 6.838%.

Watts Water Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.52 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.75%. Tennant offers a yield of 1.57% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share. Watts Water Technologies pays 19.06% of its earnings as a dividend. Tennant pays out 25.57% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Watts Water Technologies quarterly revenues are $558M, which are larger than Tennant quarterly revenues of $290M. Watts Water Technologies's net income of $74M is higher than Tennant's net income of $13.1M. Notably, Watts Water Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is 27.73x while Tennant's PE ratio is 20.79x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Watts Water Technologies is 3.62x versus 1.12x for Tennant. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Xylem has a net margin of 13.26% compared to Watts Water Technologies's net margin of 8.17%. Watts Water Technologies's return on equity of 17.55% beat Xylem's return on equity of 8.53%.

Watts Water Technologies has a consensus price target of $230.80, signalling downside risk potential of -4.68%. On the other hand Xylem has an analysts' consensus of $138.37 which suggests that it could grow by 9.78%. Given that Xylem has higher upside potential than Watts Water Technologies, analysts believe Xylem is more attractive than Watts Water Technologies.

Watts Water Technologies has a beta of 1.081, which suggesting that the stock is 8.06% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Xylem has a beta of 1.101, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 10.061%.

Watts Water Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.52 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.75%. Xylem offers a yield of 1.21% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share. Watts Water Technologies pays 19.06% of its earnings as a dividend. Xylem pays out 39.33% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Watts Water Technologies quarterly revenues are $558M, which are smaller than Xylem quarterly revenues of $2.1B. Watts Water Technologies's net income of $74M is lower than Xylem's net income of $169M. Notably, Watts Water Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is 27.73x while Xylem's PE ratio is 33.97x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Watts Water Technologies is 3.62x versus 3.57x for Xylem. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.