WTS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Ingersoll Rand has a net margin of 12.71% compared to Watts Water Technologies's net margin of 11.91%. Watts Water Technologies's return on equity of 17.85% beat Ingersoll Rand's return on equity of 8.43%.

Watts Water Technologies has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 2.7%. On the other hand Ingersoll Rand has an analysts' consensus of $108.72 which suggests that it could grow by 17.72%. Given that Ingersoll Rand has higher upside potential than Watts Water Technologies, analysts believe Ingersoll Rand is more attractive than Watts Water Technologies.

Watts Water Technologies has a beta of 0.924, which suggesting that the stock is 7.569% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ingersoll Rand has a beta of 1.419, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 41.92%.

Watts Water Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.43 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.81%. Ingersoll Rand offers a yield of 0.09% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share. Watts Water Technologies pays 17.74% of its earnings as a dividend. Ingersoll Rand pays out 4.16% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Watts Water Technologies quarterly revenues are $543.6M, which are smaller than Ingersoll Rand quarterly revenues of $1.9B. Watts Water Technologies's net income of $69.1M is lower than Ingersoll Rand's net income of $221.6M. Notably, Watts Water Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is 24.56x while Ingersoll Rand's PE ratio is 45.05x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Watts Water Technologies is 3.04x versus 5.26x for Ingersoll Rand. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Mueller Water Products has a net margin of 12.71% compared to Watts Water Technologies's net margin of 2.87%. Watts Water Technologies's return on equity of 17.85% beat Mueller Water Products's return on equity of 15.25%.

Watts Water Technologies has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 2.7%. On the other hand Mueller Water Products has an analysts' consensus of $18.33 which suggests that it could grow by 15.09%. Given that Mueller Water Products has higher upside potential than Watts Water Technologies, analysts believe Mueller Water Products is more attractive than Watts Water Technologies.

Watts Water Technologies has a beta of 0.924, which suggesting that the stock is 7.569% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Mueller Water Products has a beta of 1.372, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 37.202%.

Watts Water Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.43 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.81%. Mueller Water Products offers a yield of 1.13% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share. Watts Water Technologies pays 17.74% of its earnings as a dividend. Mueller Water Products pays out 34.43% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Watts Water Technologies quarterly revenues are $543.6M, which are larger than Mueller Water Products quarterly revenues of $348.2M. Watts Water Technologies's net income of $69.1M is higher than Mueller Water Products's net income of $10M. Notably, Watts Water Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is 24.56x while Mueller Water Products's PE ratio is 31.34x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Watts Water Technologies is 3.04x versus 2.73x for Mueller Water Products. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tennant has a net margin of 12.71% compared to Watts Water Technologies's net margin of 6.59%. Watts Water Technologies's return on equity of 17.85% beat Tennant's return on equity of 17.93%.

Watts Water Technologies has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 2.7%. On the other hand Tennant has an analysts' consensus of $128.00 which suggests that it could grow by 58.73%. Given that Tennant has higher upside potential than Watts Water Technologies, analysts believe Tennant is more attractive than Watts Water Technologies.

Watts Water Technologies has a beta of 0.924, which suggesting that the stock is 7.569% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tennant has a beta of 1.001, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.061%.

Watts Water Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.43 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.81%. Tennant offers a yield of 1.41% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share. Watts Water Technologies pays 17.74% of its earnings as a dividend. Tennant pays out 18.36% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Watts Water Technologies quarterly revenues are $543.6M, which are larger than Tennant quarterly revenues of $315.8M. Watts Water Technologies's net income of $69.1M is higher than Tennant's net income of $20.8M. Notably, Watts Water Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is 24.56x while Tennant's PE ratio is 14.22x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Watts Water Technologies is 3.04x versus 1.21x for Tennant. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Xylem has a net margin of 12.71% compared to Watts Water Technologies's net margin of 10.31%. Watts Water Technologies's return on equity of 17.85% beat Xylem's return on equity of 8.1%.

Watts Water Technologies has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 2.7%. On the other hand Xylem has an analysts' consensus of $136.36 which suggests that it could grow by 25.02%. Given that Xylem has higher upside potential than Watts Water Technologies, analysts believe Xylem is more attractive than Watts Water Technologies.

Watts Water Technologies has a beta of 0.924, which suggesting that the stock is 7.569% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Xylem has a beta of 1.051, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 5.053%.

Watts Water Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.43 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.81%. Xylem offers a yield of 1.22% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.36 per share. Watts Water Technologies pays 17.74% of its earnings as a dividend. Xylem pays out 49.1% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Watts Water Technologies quarterly revenues are $543.6M, which are smaller than Xylem quarterly revenues of $2.1B. Watts Water Technologies's net income of $69.1M is lower than Xylem's net income of $217M. Notably, Watts Water Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is 24.56x while Xylem's PE ratio is 33.95x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Watts Water Technologies is 3.04x versus 3.41x for Xylem. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.