FSLR Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Broadcom has a net margin of 35.26% compared to First Solar's net margin of 30.77%. First Solar's return on equity of 17.96% beat Broadcom's return on equity of 9.91%.

First Solar has a consensus price target of $270.40, signalling upside risk potential of 45.1%. On the other hand Broadcom has an analysts' consensus of $235.74 which suggests that it could grow by 1.46%. Given that First Solar has higher upside potential than Broadcom, analysts believe First Solar is more attractive than Broadcom.

First Solar has a beta of 1.460, which suggesting that the stock is 46.044% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Broadcom has a beta of 1.127, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 12.725%.

First Solar has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Broadcom offers a yield of 0.93% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.59 per share. First Solar pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Broadcom pays out 166.48% of its earnings as a dividend.

First Solar quarterly revenues are $887.7M, which are smaller than Broadcom quarterly revenues of $14.1B. First Solar's net income of $313M is lower than Broadcom's net income of $4.3B. Notably, First Solar's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.05x while Broadcom's PE ratio is 189.52x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for First Solar is 5.20x versus 21.35x for Broadcom. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Enphase Energy has a net margin of 35.26% compared to First Solar's net margin of 12.02%. First Solar's return on equity of 17.96% beat Enphase Energy's return on equity of 6.48%.

First Solar has a consensus price target of $270.40, signalling upside risk potential of 45.1%. On the other hand Enphase Energy has an analysts' consensus of $95.62 which suggests that it could grow by 30.98%. Given that First Solar has higher upside potential than Enphase Energy, analysts believe First Solar is more attractive than Enphase Energy.

First Solar has a beta of 1.460, which suggesting that the stock is 46.044% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Enphase Energy has a beta of 1.691, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 69.121%.

First Solar has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Enphase Energy offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. First Solar pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Enphase Energy pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

First Solar quarterly revenues are $887.7M, which are larger than Enphase Energy quarterly revenues of $380.9M. First Solar's net income of $313M is higher than Enphase Energy's net income of $45.8M. Notably, First Solar's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.05x while Enphase Energy's PE ratio is 165.91x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for First Solar is 5.20x versus 8.03x for Enphase Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

NVIDIA has a net margin of 35.26% compared to First Solar's net margin of 55.04%. First Solar's return on equity of 17.96% beat NVIDIA's return on equity of 126.43%.

First Solar has a consensus price target of $270.40, signalling upside risk potential of 45.1%. On the other hand NVIDIA has an analysts' consensus of $172.80 which suggests that it could grow by 23.72%. Given that First Solar has higher upside potential than NVIDIA, analysts believe First Solar is more attractive than NVIDIA.

First Solar has a beta of 1.460, which suggesting that the stock is 46.044% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NVIDIA has a beta of 1.635, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 63.477%.

First Solar has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. NVIDIA offers a yield of 0.02% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. First Solar pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. NVIDIA pays out 1.33% of its earnings as a dividend. NVIDIA's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

First Solar quarterly revenues are $887.7M, which are smaller than NVIDIA quarterly revenues of $35.1B. First Solar's net income of $313M is lower than NVIDIA's net income of $19.3B. Notably, First Solar's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.05x while NVIDIA's PE ratio is 54.97x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for First Solar is 5.20x versus 30.66x for NVIDIA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

ON Semiconductor has a net margin of 35.26% compared to First Solar's net margin of 22.8%. First Solar's return on equity of 17.96% beat ON Semiconductor's return on equity of 21.72%.

First Solar has a consensus price target of $270.40, signalling upside risk potential of 45.1%. On the other hand ON Semiconductor has an analysts' consensus of $85.87 which suggests that it could grow by 28.88%. Given that First Solar has higher upside potential than ON Semiconductor, analysts believe First Solar is more attractive than ON Semiconductor.

First Solar has a beta of 1.460, which suggesting that the stock is 46.044% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ON Semiconductor has a beta of 1.628, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 62.845%.

First Solar has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. ON Semiconductor offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. First Solar pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. ON Semiconductor pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

First Solar quarterly revenues are $887.7M, which are smaller than ON Semiconductor quarterly revenues of $1.8B. First Solar's net income of $313M is lower than ON Semiconductor's net income of $401.7M. Notably, First Solar's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.05x while ON Semiconductor's PE ratio is 16.53x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for First Solar is 5.20x versus 3.93x for ON Semiconductor. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.