CRUS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Broadcom has a net margin of 18.85% compared to Cirrus Logic's net margin of 30.77%. Cirrus Logic's return on equity of 18.01% beat Broadcom's return on equity of 9.91%.

Cirrus Logic has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 30.77%. On the other hand Broadcom has an analysts' consensus of $235.74 which suggests that it could fall by -1.65%. Given that Cirrus Logic has higher upside potential than Broadcom, analysts believe Cirrus Logic is more attractive than Broadcom.

Cirrus Logic has a beta of 0.929, which suggesting that the stock is 7.077% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Broadcom has a beta of 1.127, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 12.725%.

Cirrus Logic has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Broadcom offers a yield of 0.91% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.59 per share. Cirrus Logic pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Broadcom pays out 166.48% of its earnings as a dividend.

Cirrus Logic quarterly revenues are $541.9M, which are smaller than Broadcom quarterly revenues of $14.1B. Cirrus Logic's net income of $102.1M is lower than Broadcom's net income of $4.3B. Notably, Cirrus Logic's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.37x while Broadcom's PE ratio is 195.50x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cirrus Logic is 2.99x versus 22.03x for Broadcom. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

FormFactor has a net margin of 18.85% compared to Cirrus Logic's net margin of 9.01%. Cirrus Logic's return on equity of 18.01% beat FormFactor's return on equity of 14.83%.

Cirrus Logic has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 30.77%. On the other hand FormFactor has an analysts' consensus of $53.56 which suggests that it could grow by 12.04%. Given that Cirrus Logic has higher upside potential than FormFactor, analysts believe Cirrus Logic is more attractive than FormFactor.

Cirrus Logic has a beta of 0.929, which suggesting that the stock is 7.077% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison FormFactor has a beta of 1.116, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 11.61%.

Cirrus Logic has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. FormFactor offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Cirrus Logic pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. FormFactor pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Cirrus Logic quarterly revenues are $541.9M, which are larger than FormFactor quarterly revenues of $207.9M. Cirrus Logic's net income of $102.1M is higher than FormFactor's net income of $18.7M. Notably, Cirrus Logic's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.37x while FormFactor's PE ratio is 27.47x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cirrus Logic is 2.99x versus 5.07x for FormFactor. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Intel has a net margin of 18.85% compared to Cirrus Logic's net margin of -125.26%. Cirrus Logic's return on equity of 18.01% beat Intel's return on equity of -14.47%.

Cirrus Logic has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 30.77%. On the other hand Intel has an analysts' consensus of $24.33 which suggests that it could grow by 19.26%. Given that Cirrus Logic has higher upside potential than Intel, analysts believe Cirrus Logic is more attractive than Intel.

Cirrus Logic has a beta of 0.929, which suggesting that the stock is 7.077% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Intel has a beta of 1.052, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 5.181%.

Cirrus Logic has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Intel offers a yield of 2.45% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. Cirrus Logic pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Intel pays out 182.83% of its earnings as a dividend.

Cirrus Logic quarterly revenues are $541.9M, which are smaller than Intel quarterly revenues of $13.3B. Cirrus Logic's net income of $102.1M is higher than Intel's net income of -$16.6B. Notably, Cirrus Logic's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.37x while Intel's PE ratio is 91.26x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cirrus Logic is 2.99x versus 1.61x for Intel. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Skyworks Solutions has a net margin of 18.85% compared to Cirrus Logic's net margin of 5.9%. Cirrus Logic's return on equity of 18.01% beat Skyworks Solutions's return on equity of 9.51%.

Cirrus Logic has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 30.77%. On the other hand Skyworks Solutions has an analysts' consensus of $94.78 which suggests that it could grow by 4.9%. Given that Cirrus Logic has higher upside potential than Skyworks Solutions, analysts believe Cirrus Logic is more attractive than Skyworks Solutions.

Cirrus Logic has a beta of 0.929, which suggesting that the stock is 7.077% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Skyworks Solutions has a beta of 1.187, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 18.692%.

Cirrus Logic has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Skyworks Solutions offers a yield of 3.06% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.70 per share. Cirrus Logic pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Skyworks Solutions pays out 73.68% of its earnings as a dividend. Skyworks Solutions's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Cirrus Logic quarterly revenues are $541.9M, which are smaller than Skyworks Solutions quarterly revenues of $1B. Cirrus Logic's net income of $102.1M is higher than Skyworks Solutions's net income of $60.5M. Notably, Cirrus Logic's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.37x while Skyworks Solutions's PE ratio is 24.42x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cirrus Logic is 2.99x versus 3.49x for Skyworks Solutions. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.