CDNS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Autodesk has a net margin of 22.02% compared to Cadence Design Systems's net margin of 18.49%. Cadence Design Systems's return on equity of 24.76% beat Autodesk's return on equity of 47.41%.

Cadence Design Systems has a consensus price target of $320.84, signalling downside risk potential of -0.22%. On the other hand Autodesk has an analysts' consensus of $321.21 which suggests that it could grow by 7.76%. Given that Autodesk has higher upside potential than Cadence Design Systems, analysts believe Autodesk is more attractive than Cadence Design Systems.

Cadence Design Systems has a beta of 1.045, which suggesting that the stock is 4.533% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Autodesk has a beta of 1.468, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 46.828%.

Cadence Design Systems has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Autodesk offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Cadence Design Systems pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Autodesk pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Cadence Design Systems quarterly revenues are $1.2B, which are smaller than Autodesk quarterly revenues of $1.6B. Cadence Design Systems's net income of $273.6M is lower than Autodesk's net income of $303M. Notably, Cadence Design Systems's price-to-earnings ratio is 81.41x while Autodesk's PE ratio is 58.11x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cadence Design Systems is 18.07x versus 10.55x for Autodesk. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Microsoft has a net margin of 22.02% compared to Cadence Design Systems's net margin of 36.86%. Cadence Design Systems's return on equity of 24.76% beat Microsoft's return on equity of 33.7%.

Cadence Design Systems has a consensus price target of $320.84, signalling downside risk potential of -0.22%. On the other hand Microsoft has an analysts' consensus of $507.32 which suggests that it could grow by 11.68%. Given that Microsoft has higher upside potential than Cadence Design Systems, analysts believe Microsoft is more attractive than Cadence Design Systems.

Cadence Design Systems has a beta of 1.045, which suggesting that the stock is 4.533% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Microsoft has a beta of 0.989, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.148%.

Cadence Design Systems has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Microsoft offers a yield of 0.71% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.83 per share. Cadence Design Systems pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Microsoft pays out 24.7% of its earnings as a dividend. Microsoft's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Cadence Design Systems quarterly revenues are $1.2B, which are smaller than Microsoft quarterly revenues of $70.1B. Cadence Design Systems's net income of $273.6M is lower than Microsoft's net income of $25.8B. Notably, Cadence Design Systems's price-to-earnings ratio is 81.41x while Microsoft's PE ratio is 35.11x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cadence Design Systems is 18.07x versus 12.57x for Microsoft. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

PTC has a net margin of 22.02% compared to Cadence Design Systems's net margin of 25.56%. Cadence Design Systems's return on equity of 24.76% beat PTC's return on equity of 13.95%.

Cadence Design Systems has a consensus price target of $320.84, signalling downside risk potential of -0.22%. On the other hand PTC has an analysts' consensus of $185.62 which suggests that it could grow by 7.35%. Given that PTC has higher upside potential than Cadence Design Systems, analysts believe PTC is more attractive than Cadence Design Systems.

Cadence Design Systems has a beta of 1.045, which suggesting that the stock is 4.533% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison PTC has a beta of 1.188, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 18.833%.

Cadence Design Systems has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. PTC offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Cadence Design Systems pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. PTC pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Cadence Design Systems quarterly revenues are $1.2B, which are larger than PTC quarterly revenues of $636.4M. Cadence Design Systems's net income of $273.6M is higher than PTC's net income of $162.6M. Notably, Cadence Design Systems's price-to-earnings ratio is 81.41x while PTC's PE ratio is 47.50x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cadence Design Systems is 18.07x versus 8.92x for PTC. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Synopsys has a net margin of 22.02% compared to Cadence Design Systems's net margin of 20.32%. Cadence Design Systems's return on equity of 24.76% beat Synopsys's return on equity of 26.4%.

Cadence Design Systems has a consensus price target of $320.84, signalling downside risk potential of -0.22%. On the other hand Synopsys has an analysts' consensus of $595.21 which suggests that it could grow by 15.7%. Given that Synopsys has higher upside potential than Cadence Design Systems, analysts believe Synopsys is more attractive than Cadence Design Systems.

Cadence Design Systems has a beta of 1.045, which suggesting that the stock is 4.533% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Synopsys has a beta of 1.164, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 16.359%.

Cadence Design Systems has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Synopsys offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Cadence Design Systems pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Synopsys pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Cadence Design Systems quarterly revenues are $1.2B, which are smaller than Synopsys quarterly revenues of $1.5B. Cadence Design Systems's net income of $273.6M is lower than Synopsys's net income of $295.7M. Notably, Cadence Design Systems's price-to-earnings ratio is 81.41x while Synopsys's PE ratio is 38.04x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cadence Design Systems is 18.07x versus 13.22x for Synopsys. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.