Financhill
Buy
60

BHF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Last price:
$53.75
Seasonality move :
3.52%
Day range:
$53.39 - $54.75
52-week range:
$40.00 - $64.12
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
6.45x
P/S ratio:
0.49x
P/B ratio:
0.59x
Volume:
842.3K
Avg. volume:
770.3K
1-year change:
24%
Market cap:
$3.1B
Revenue:
$4.4B
EPS (TTM):
$8.34

Price Performance History

Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Competitors

Company Revenue Forecast Earnings Forecast Revenue Growth Forecast Earnings Growth Forecast Analyst Price Target Median
BHF
Brighthouse Financial
$2.2B $4.84 66.12% 3938.75% $60.38
AAME
Atlantic American
-- -- -- -- --
ABL
Abacus Global Management
$43.4M $0.17 49.2% 1580% $13.70
CIA
Citizens
$62.8M $0.04 1.12% -50% $5.00
GNW
Genworth Financial
-- $0.05 -- -32.26% $9.00
LNC
Lincoln National
$4.7B $1.96 1.26% -61.11% $38.09
Company Price Analyst Target Market Cap P/E Ratio Dividend per Share Dividend Yield Price / LTM Sales
BHF
Brighthouse Financial
$53.78 $60.38 $3.1B 6.45x $0.00 0% 0.49x
AAME
Atlantic American
$2.37 -- $48.3M 18.85x $0.02 0.84% 0.25x
ABL
Abacus Global Management
$5.30 $13.70 $507.8M 70.19x $0.00 0% 3.15x
CIA
Citizens
$3.61 $5.00 $181M 21.24x $0.00 0% 0.76x
GNW
Genworth Financial
$7.87 $9.00 $3.3B 16.06x $0.00 0% 0.48x
LNC
Lincoln National
$34.87 $38.09 $6B 4.95x $0.45 5.16% 0.33x
Company Total Debt / Total Capital Beta Debt to Equity Quick Ratio
BHF
Brighthouse Financial
37.59% 0.699 92.23% --
AAME
Atlantic American
26.94% 1.056 108.72% 3.47x
ABL
Abacus Global Management
44.97% -0.901 49.28% 0.46x
CIA
Citizens
-- 0.148 -- 4.69x
GNW
Genworth Financial
14.85% 1.250 38.75% --
LNC
Lincoln National
41.73% 0.849 82.47% 6.67x
Company Gross Profit Operating Income Return on Invested Capital Return on Common Equity EBIT Margin Free Cash Flow
BHF
Brighthouse Financial
-- -- 7.63% 12.57% -13.62% $146M
AAME
Atlantic American
-- -- -1.05% -1.44% 3.61% -$986K
ABL
Abacus Global Management
$37M $17.4M -3.17% -5.84% 39.31% -$61.8M
CIA
Citizens
-- -- 4.9% 4.28% -3.21% $641K
GNW
Genworth Financial
-- -- 1.97% 2.3% 8.55% $34M
LNC
Lincoln National
-- -- 9.31% 16.26% -18.42% -$272M

Brighthouse Financial vs. Competitors

  • Which has Higher Returns BHF or AAME?

    Atlantic American has a net margin of -11.55% compared to Brighthouse Financial's net margin of 1.6%. Brighthouse Financial's return on equity of 12.57% beat Atlantic American's return on equity of -1.44%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    BHF
    Brighthouse Financial
    -- -$5.04 $8.5B
    AAME
    Atlantic American
    -- $0.03 $140.1M
  • What do Analysts Say About BHF or AAME?

    Brighthouse Financial has a consensus price target of $60.38, signalling upside risk potential of 12.26%. On the other hand Atlantic American has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Brighthouse Financial has higher upside potential than Atlantic American, analysts believe Brighthouse Financial is more attractive than Atlantic American.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    BHF
    Brighthouse Financial
    1 5 1
    AAME
    Atlantic American
    0 0 0
  • Is BHF or AAME More Risky?

    Brighthouse Financial has a beta of 0.876, which suggesting that the stock is 12.372% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Atlantic American has a beta of 0.761, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 23.891%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock BHF or AAME?

    Brighthouse Financial has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Atlantic American offers a yield of 0.84% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share. Brighthouse Financial pays 26.29% of its earnings as a dividend. Atlantic American pays out -18.91% of its earnings as a dividend. Brighthouse Financial's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios BHF or AAME?

    Brighthouse Financial quarterly revenues are $2.3B, which are larger than Atlantic American quarterly revenues of $50.1M. Brighthouse Financial's net income of -$268M is lower than Atlantic American's net income of $802K. Notably, Brighthouse Financial's price-to-earnings ratio is 6.45x while Atlantic American's PE ratio is 18.85x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Brighthouse Financial is 0.49x versus 0.25x for Atlantic American. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    BHF
    Brighthouse Financial
    0.49x 6.45x $2.3B -$268M
    AAME
    Atlantic American
    0.25x 18.85x $50.1M $802K
  • Which has Higher Returns BHF or ABL?

    Abacus Global Management has a net margin of -11.55% compared to Brighthouse Financial's net margin of 10.51%. Brighthouse Financial's return on equity of 12.57% beat Abacus Global Management's return on equity of -5.84%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    BHF
    Brighthouse Financial
    -- -$5.04 $8.5B
    ABL
    Abacus Global Management
    83.9% $0.05 $791.6M
  • What do Analysts Say About BHF or ABL?

    Brighthouse Financial has a consensus price target of $60.38, signalling upside risk potential of 12.26%. On the other hand Abacus Global Management has an analysts' consensus of $13.70 which suggests that it could grow by 158.49%. Given that Abacus Global Management has higher upside potential than Brighthouse Financial, analysts believe Abacus Global Management is more attractive than Brighthouse Financial.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    BHF
    Brighthouse Financial
    1 5 1
    ABL
    Abacus Global Management
    3 0 0
  • Is BHF or ABL More Risky?

    Brighthouse Financial has a beta of 0.876, which suggesting that the stock is 12.372% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Abacus Global Management has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock BHF or ABL?

    Brighthouse Financial has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Abacus Global Management offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Brighthouse Financial pays 26.29% of its earnings as a dividend. Abacus Global Management pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Brighthouse Financial's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios BHF or ABL?

    Brighthouse Financial quarterly revenues are $2.3B, which are larger than Abacus Global Management quarterly revenues of $44.1M. Brighthouse Financial's net income of -$268M is lower than Abacus Global Management's net income of $4.6M. Notably, Brighthouse Financial's price-to-earnings ratio is 6.45x while Abacus Global Management's PE ratio is 70.19x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Brighthouse Financial is 0.49x versus 3.15x for Abacus Global Management. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    BHF
    Brighthouse Financial
    0.49x 6.45x $2.3B -$268M
    ABL
    Abacus Global Management
    3.15x 70.19x $44.1M $4.6M
  • Which has Higher Returns BHF or CIA?

    Citizens has a net margin of -11.55% compared to Brighthouse Financial's net margin of -2.92%. Brighthouse Financial's return on equity of 12.57% beat Citizens's return on equity of 4.28%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    BHF
    Brighthouse Financial
    -- -$5.04 $8.5B
    CIA
    Citizens
    -- -$0.03 $218.1M
  • What do Analysts Say About BHF or CIA?

    Brighthouse Financial has a consensus price target of $60.38, signalling upside risk potential of 12.26%. On the other hand Citizens has an analysts' consensus of $5.00 which suggests that it could grow by 38.5%. Given that Citizens has higher upside potential than Brighthouse Financial, analysts believe Citizens is more attractive than Brighthouse Financial.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    BHF
    Brighthouse Financial
    1 5 1
    CIA
    Citizens
    0 0 0
  • Is BHF or CIA More Risky?

    Brighthouse Financial has a beta of 0.876, which suggesting that the stock is 12.372% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Citizens has a beta of 0.362, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 63.811%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock BHF or CIA?

    Brighthouse Financial has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Citizens offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Brighthouse Financial pays 26.29% of its earnings as a dividend. Citizens pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Brighthouse Financial's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios BHF or CIA?

    Brighthouse Financial quarterly revenues are $2.3B, which are larger than Citizens quarterly revenues of $55.7M. Brighthouse Financial's net income of -$268M is lower than Citizens's net income of -$1.6M. Notably, Brighthouse Financial's price-to-earnings ratio is 6.45x while Citizens's PE ratio is 21.24x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Brighthouse Financial is 0.49x versus 0.76x for Citizens. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    BHF
    Brighthouse Financial
    0.49x 6.45x $2.3B -$268M
    CIA
    Citizens
    0.76x 21.24x $55.7M -$1.6M
  • Which has Higher Returns BHF or GNW?

    Genworth Financial has a net margin of -11.55% compared to Brighthouse Financial's net margin of 3.04%. Brighthouse Financial's return on equity of 12.57% beat Genworth Financial's return on equity of 2.3%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    BHF
    Brighthouse Financial
    -- -$5.04 $8.5B
    GNW
    Genworth Financial
    -- $0.13 $11.2B
  • What do Analysts Say About BHF or GNW?

    Brighthouse Financial has a consensus price target of $60.38, signalling upside risk potential of 12.26%. On the other hand Genworth Financial has an analysts' consensus of $9.00 which suggests that it could grow by 14.36%. Given that Genworth Financial has higher upside potential than Brighthouse Financial, analysts believe Genworth Financial is more attractive than Brighthouse Financial.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    BHF
    Brighthouse Financial
    1 5 1
    GNW
    Genworth Financial
    0 0 0
  • Is BHF or GNW More Risky?

    Brighthouse Financial has a beta of 0.876, which suggesting that the stock is 12.372% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Genworth Financial has a beta of 1.056, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 5.621%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock BHF or GNW?

    Brighthouse Financial has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Genworth Financial offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Brighthouse Financial pays 26.29% of its earnings as a dividend. Genworth Financial pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Brighthouse Financial's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios BHF or GNW?

    Brighthouse Financial quarterly revenues are $2.3B, which are larger than Genworth Financial quarterly revenues of $1.8B. Brighthouse Financial's net income of -$268M is lower than Genworth Financial's net income of $54M. Notably, Brighthouse Financial's price-to-earnings ratio is 6.45x while Genworth Financial's PE ratio is 16.06x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Brighthouse Financial is 0.49x versus 0.48x for Genworth Financial. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    BHF
    Brighthouse Financial
    0.49x 6.45x $2.3B -$268M
    GNW
    Genworth Financial
    0.48x 16.06x $1.8B $54M
  • Which has Higher Returns BHF or LNC?

    Lincoln National has a net margin of -11.55% compared to Brighthouse Financial's net margin of -15.3%. Brighthouse Financial's return on equity of 12.57% beat Lincoln National's return on equity of 16.26%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    BHF
    Brighthouse Financial
    -- -$5.04 $8.5B
    LNC
    Lincoln National
    -- -$4.41 $14.1B
  • What do Analysts Say About BHF or LNC?

    Brighthouse Financial has a consensus price target of $60.38, signalling upside risk potential of 12.26%. On the other hand Lincoln National has an analysts' consensus of $38.09 which suggests that it could grow by 9.24%. Given that Brighthouse Financial has higher upside potential than Lincoln National, analysts believe Brighthouse Financial is more attractive than Lincoln National.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    BHF
    Brighthouse Financial
    1 5 1
    LNC
    Lincoln National
    1 10 0
  • Is BHF or LNC More Risky?

    Brighthouse Financial has a beta of 0.876, which suggesting that the stock is 12.372% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lincoln National has a beta of 1.399, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 39.926%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock BHF or LNC?

    Brighthouse Financial has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Lincoln National offers a yield of 5.16% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.45 per share. Brighthouse Financial pays 26.29% of its earnings as a dividend. Lincoln National pays out 12.15% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios BHF or LNC?

    Brighthouse Financial quarterly revenues are $2.3B, which are smaller than Lincoln National quarterly revenues of $4.7B. Brighthouse Financial's net income of -$268M is higher than Lincoln National's net income of -$722M. Notably, Brighthouse Financial's price-to-earnings ratio is 6.45x while Lincoln National's PE ratio is 4.95x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Brighthouse Financial is 0.49x versus 0.33x for Lincoln National. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    BHF
    Brighthouse Financial
    0.49x 6.45x $2.3B -$268M
    LNC
    Lincoln National
    0.33x 4.95x $4.7B -$722M

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Popular

Why Is Goldman Sachs Stock Up So Much?
Why Is Goldman Sachs Stock Up So Much?

Investment banking giant Goldman Sachs (NYSE:GS) has sharply outperformed the…

How High Could Coherent Stock Go?
How High Could Coherent Stock Go?

Coherent (NYSE:COHR) is a major manufacturer of networking, laser and…

Chime vs SoFi Stock Which Is Best?
Chime vs SoFi Stock Which Is Best?

SoFi Technologies (NASDAQ: SOFI) has been living under Wall Street’s microscope…

Stock Ideas

Buy
60
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.7T
P/E Ratio: 52x

Buy
62
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.7T
P/E Ratio: 42x

Sell
46
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.1T
P/E Ratio: 34x

Alerts

Buy
60
AEVA alert for Jul 2

Aeva Technologies [AEVA] is up 7.78% over the past day.

Sell
44
PRGS alert for Jul 2

Progress Software [PRGS] is down 2.94% over the past day.

Sell
46
NAIL alert for Jul 2

Direxion Daily Homebuilders & Supplies Bull 3X Shs [NAIL] is up 3.1% over the past day.

THE #1 STOCK ANALYSIS TOOL
TO MAKE SMARTER BUY AND SELL DECISIONS

Show me the best stock