LNC Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Abacus Global Management has a net margin of -15.3% compared to Lincoln National's net margin of 10.51%. Lincoln National's return on equity of 16.26% beat Abacus Global Management's return on equity of -5.84%.

Lincoln National has a consensus price target of $38.09, signalling upside risk potential of 15.92%. On the other hand Abacus Global Management has an analysts' consensus of $13.70 which suggests that it could grow by 146.85%. Given that Abacus Global Management has higher upside potential than Lincoln National, analysts believe Abacus Global Management is more attractive than Lincoln National.

Lincoln National has a beta of 1.402, which suggesting that the stock is 40.214% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Abacus Global Management has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Lincoln National has a quarterly dividend of $0.45 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.48%. Abacus Global Management offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Lincoln National pays 12.15% of its earnings as a dividend. Abacus Global Management pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Lincoln National's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Lincoln National quarterly revenues are $4.7B, which are larger than Abacus Global Management quarterly revenues of $44.1M. Lincoln National's net income of -$722M is lower than Abacus Global Management's net income of $4.6M. Notably, Lincoln National's price-to-earnings ratio is 4.67x while Abacus Global Management's PE ratio is 70.19x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lincoln National is 0.31x versus 3.30x for Abacus Global Management. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Brighthouse Financial has a net margin of -15.3% compared to Lincoln National's net margin of -11.55%. Lincoln National's return on equity of 16.26% beat Brighthouse Financial's return on equity of 12.57%.

Lincoln National has a consensus price target of $38.09, signalling upside risk potential of 15.92%. On the other hand Brighthouse Financial has an analysts' consensus of $60.38 which suggests that it could grow by 4.02%. Given that Lincoln National has higher upside potential than Brighthouse Financial, analysts believe Lincoln National is more attractive than Brighthouse Financial.

Lincoln National has a beta of 1.402, which suggesting that the stock is 40.214% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Brighthouse Financial has a beta of 0.915, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.474%.

Lincoln National has a quarterly dividend of $0.45 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.48%. Brighthouse Financial offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Lincoln National pays 12.15% of its earnings as a dividend. Brighthouse Financial pays out 26.29% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Lincoln National quarterly revenues are $4.7B, which are larger than Brighthouse Financial quarterly revenues of $2.3B. Lincoln National's net income of -$722M is lower than Brighthouse Financial's net income of -$268M. Notably, Lincoln National's price-to-earnings ratio is 4.67x while Brighthouse Financial's PE ratio is 6.96x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lincoln National is 0.31x versus 0.53x for Brighthouse Financial. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Citizens has a net margin of -15.3% compared to Lincoln National's net margin of -2.92%. Lincoln National's return on equity of 16.26% beat Citizens's return on equity of 4.28%.

Lincoln National has a consensus price target of $38.09, signalling upside risk potential of 15.92%. On the other hand Citizens has an analysts' consensus of $5.00 which suggests that it could grow by 50.15%. Given that Citizens has higher upside potential than Lincoln National, analysts believe Citizens is more attractive than Lincoln National.

Lincoln National has a beta of 1.402, which suggesting that the stock is 40.214% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Citizens has a beta of 0.380, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 61.953%.

Lincoln National has a quarterly dividend of $0.45 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.48%. Citizens offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Lincoln National pays 12.15% of its earnings as a dividend. Citizens pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Lincoln National's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Lincoln National quarterly revenues are $4.7B, which are larger than Citizens quarterly revenues of $55.7M. Lincoln National's net income of -$722M is lower than Citizens's net income of -$1.6M. Notably, Lincoln National's price-to-earnings ratio is 4.67x while Citizens's PE ratio is 19.59x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lincoln National is 0.31x versus 0.70x for Citizens. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Primerica has a net margin of -15.3% compared to Lincoln National's net margin of 21%. Lincoln National's return on equity of 16.26% beat Primerica's return on equity of 23.29%.

Lincoln National has a consensus price target of $38.09, signalling upside risk potential of 15.92%. On the other hand Primerica has an analysts' consensus of $307.14 which suggests that it could grow by 19.27%. Given that Primerica has higher upside potential than Lincoln National, analysts believe Primerica is more attractive than Lincoln National.

Lincoln National has a beta of 1.402, which suggesting that the stock is 40.214% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Primerica has a beta of 0.992, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.803%.

Lincoln National has a quarterly dividend of $0.45 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.48%. Primerica offers a yield of 1.51% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.04 per share. Lincoln National pays 12.15% of its earnings as a dividend. Primerica pays out 23.98% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Lincoln National quarterly revenues are $4.7B, which are larger than Primerica quarterly revenues of $804.8M. Lincoln National's net income of -$722M is lower than Primerica's net income of $169.1M. Notably, Lincoln National's price-to-earnings ratio is 4.67x while Primerica's PE ratio is 17.32x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lincoln National is 0.31x versus 2.74x for Primerica. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.