ARHS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Brilliant Earth Group has a net margin of 1.57% compared to Arhaus's net margin of -0.5%. Arhaus's return on equity of 18.14% beat Brilliant Earth Group's return on equity of -0.06%.

Arhaus has a consensus price target of $9.88, signalling upside risk potential of 13.12%. On the other hand Brilliant Earth Group has an analysts' consensus of $2.13 which suggests that it could grow by 52.88%. Given that Brilliant Earth Group has higher upside potential than Arhaus, analysts believe Brilliant Earth Group is more attractive than Arhaus.

Arhaus has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Brilliant Earth Group has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Arhaus has a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Brilliant Earth Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Arhaus pays 102.49% of its earnings as a dividend. Brilliant Earth Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Arhaus quarterly revenues are $311.4M, which are larger than Brilliant Earth Group quarterly revenues of $93.9M. Arhaus's net income of $4.9M is higher than Brilliant Earth Group's net income of -$466K. Notably, Arhaus's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.29x while Brilliant Earth Group's PE ratio is 50.67x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Arhaus is 0.96x versus 0.19x for Brilliant Earth Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Genuine Parts has a net margin of 1.57% compared to Arhaus's net margin of 3.31%. Arhaus's return on equity of 18.14% beat Genuine Parts's return on equity of 18.88%.

Arhaus has a consensus price target of $9.88, signalling upside risk potential of 13.12%. On the other hand Genuine Parts has an analysts' consensus of $131.36 which suggests that it could grow by 9.03%. Given that Arhaus has higher upside potential than Genuine Parts, analysts believe Arhaus is more attractive than Genuine Parts.

Arhaus has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Genuine Parts has a beta of 0.766, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 23.399%.

Arhaus has a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Genuine Parts offers a yield of 3.37% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.03 per share. Arhaus pays 102.49% of its earnings as a dividend. Genuine Parts pays out 61.38% of its earnings as a dividend. Genuine Parts's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Arhaus's is not.

Arhaus quarterly revenues are $311.4M, which are smaller than Genuine Parts quarterly revenues of $5.9B. Arhaus's net income of $4.9M is lower than Genuine Parts's net income of $194.4M. Notably, Arhaus's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.29x while Genuine Parts's PE ratio is 19.78x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Arhaus is 0.96x versus 0.71x for Genuine Parts. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

CarMax has a net margin of 1.57% compared to Arhaus's net margin of 2.79%. Arhaus's return on equity of 18.14% beat CarMax's return on equity of 8.98%.

Arhaus has a consensus price target of $9.88, signalling upside risk potential of 13.12%. On the other hand CarMax has an analysts' consensus of $83.88 which suggests that it could grow by 25.95%. Given that CarMax has higher upside potential than Arhaus, analysts believe CarMax is more attractive than Arhaus.

Arhaus has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CarMax has a beta of 1.380, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 37.989%.

Arhaus has a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. CarMax offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Arhaus pays 102.49% of its earnings as a dividend. CarMax pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Arhaus quarterly revenues are $311.4M, which are smaller than CarMax quarterly revenues of $7.5B. Arhaus's net income of $4.9M is lower than CarMax's net income of $210.4M. Notably, Arhaus's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.29x while CarMax's PE ratio is 18.40x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Arhaus is 0.96x versus 0.38x for CarMax. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

OneWater Marine has a net margin of 1.57% compared to Arhaus's net margin of -0.08%. Arhaus's return on equity of 18.14% beat OneWater Marine's return on equity of -1.78%.

Arhaus has a consensus price target of $9.88, signalling upside risk potential of 13.12%. On the other hand OneWater Marine has an analysts' consensus of $16.75 which suggests that it could grow by 21.91%. Given that OneWater Marine has higher upside potential than Arhaus, analysts believe OneWater Marine is more attractive than Arhaus.

Arhaus has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison OneWater Marine has a beta of 2.046, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 104.611%.

Arhaus has a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. OneWater Marine offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Arhaus pays 102.49% of its earnings as a dividend. OneWater Marine pays out -94.92% of its earnings as a dividend.

Arhaus quarterly revenues are $311.4M, which are smaller than OneWater Marine quarterly revenues of $483.5M. Arhaus's net income of $4.9M is higher than OneWater Marine's net income of -$368K. Notably, Arhaus's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.29x while OneWater Marine's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Arhaus is 0.96x versus 0.12x for OneWater Marine. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.