ANSS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Autodesk has a net margin of 21.3% compared to Ansys's net margin of 17.52%. Ansys's return on equity of 10.43% beat Autodesk's return on equity of 51.52%.

Ansys has a consensus price target of $348.25, signalling upside risk potential of 2.93%. On the other hand Autodesk has an analysts' consensus of $327.01 which suggests that it could grow by 8.56%. Given that Autodesk has higher upside potential than Ansys, analysts believe Autodesk is more attractive than Ansys.

Ansys has a beta of 1.105, which suggesting that the stock is 10.468% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Autodesk has a beta of 1.432, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 43.152%.

Ansys has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Autodesk offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Ansys pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Autodesk pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Ansys quarterly revenues are $601.9M, which are smaller than Autodesk quarterly revenues of $1.6B. Ansys's net income of $128.2M is lower than Autodesk's net income of $275M. Notably, Ansys's price-to-earnings ratio is 52.83x while Autodesk's PE ratio is 59.77x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ansys is 12.19x versus 10.95x for Autodesk. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Cadence Design Systems has a net margin of 21.3% compared to Ansys's net margin of 19.59%. Ansys's return on equity of 10.43% beat Cadence Design Systems's return on equity of 27.48%.

Ansys has a consensus price target of $348.25, signalling upside risk potential of 2.93%. On the other hand Cadence Design Systems has an analysts' consensus of $319.72 which suggests that it could grow by 3.61%. Given that Cadence Design Systems has higher upside potential than Ansys, analysts believe Cadence Design Systems is more attractive than Ansys.

Ansys has a beta of 1.105, which suggesting that the stock is 10.468% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cadence Design Systems has a beta of 1.027, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 2.746%.

Ansys has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Cadence Design Systems offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Ansys pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Cadence Design Systems pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Ansys quarterly revenues are $601.9M, which are smaller than Cadence Design Systems quarterly revenues of $1.2B. Ansys's net income of $128.2M is lower than Cadence Design Systems's net income of $238.1M. Notably, Ansys's price-to-earnings ratio is 52.83x while Cadence Design Systems's PE ratio is 80.99x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ansys is 12.19x versus 19.37x for Cadence Design Systems. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Procore Technologies has a net margin of 21.3% compared to Ansys's net margin of -8.92%. Ansys's return on equity of 10.43% beat Procore Technologies's return on equity of -6.08%.

Ansys has a consensus price target of $348.25, signalling upside risk potential of 2.93%. On the other hand Procore Technologies has an analysts' consensus of $82.12 which suggests that it could grow by 5.56%. Given that Procore Technologies has higher upside potential than Ansys, analysts believe Procore Technologies is more attractive than Ansys.

Ansys has a beta of 1.105, which suggesting that the stock is 10.468% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Procore Technologies has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Ansys has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Procore Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Ansys pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Procore Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Ansys quarterly revenues are $601.9M, which are larger than Procore Technologies quarterly revenues of $295.9M. Ansys's net income of $128.2M is higher than Procore Technologies's net income of -$26.4M. Notably, Ansys's price-to-earnings ratio is 52.83x while Procore Technologies's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ansys is 12.19x versus 10.25x for Procore Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Synopsys has a net margin of 21.3% compared to Ansys's net margin of 68.1%. Ansys's return on equity of 10.43% beat Synopsys's return on equity of 30.71%.

Ansys has a consensus price target of $348.25, signalling upside risk potential of 2.93%. On the other hand Synopsys has an analysts' consensus of $637.78 which suggests that it could grow by 27.52%. Given that Synopsys has higher upside potential than Ansys, analysts believe Synopsys is more attractive than Ansys.

Ansys has a beta of 1.105, which suggesting that the stock is 10.468% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Synopsys has a beta of 1.083, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.289%.

Ansys has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Synopsys offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Ansys pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Synopsys pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Ansys quarterly revenues are $601.9M, which are smaller than Synopsys quarterly revenues of $1.6B. Ansys's net income of $128.2M is lower than Synopsys's net income of $1.1B. Notably, Ansys's price-to-earnings ratio is 52.83x while Synopsys's PE ratio is 34.44x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ansys is 12.19x versus 12.44x for Synopsys. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.