ANSS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Autodesk has a net margin of 10.27% compared to Ansys's net margin of 9.31%. Ansys's return on equity of 10.19% beat Autodesk's return on equity of 40.52%.

Ansys has a consensus price target of $347.71, signalling upside risk potential of 1.26%. On the other hand Autodesk has an analysts' consensus of $336.87 which suggests that it could grow by 10.47%. Given that Autodesk has higher upside potential than Ansys, analysts believe Autodesk is more attractive than Ansys.

Ansys has a beta of 1.188, which suggesting that the stock is 18.847% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Autodesk has a beta of 1.450, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 45.009%.

Ansys has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Autodesk offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Ansys pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Autodesk pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Ansys quarterly revenues are $504.9M, which are smaller than Autodesk quarterly revenues of $1.6B. Ansys's net income of $51.9M is lower than Autodesk's net income of $152M. Notably, Ansys's price-to-earnings ratio is 50.95x while Autodesk's PE ratio is 65.30x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ansys is 11.70x versus 10.41x for Autodesk. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Cadence Design Systems has a net margin of 10.27% compared to Ansys's net margin of 22.02%. Ansys's return on equity of 10.19% beat Cadence Design Systems's return on equity of 24.76%.

Ansys has a consensus price target of $347.71, signalling upside risk potential of 1.26%. On the other hand Cadence Design Systems has an analysts' consensus of $320.98 which suggests that it could grow by 5.69%. Given that Cadence Design Systems has higher upside potential than Ansys, analysts believe Cadence Design Systems is more attractive than Ansys.

Ansys has a beta of 1.188, which suggesting that the stock is 18.847% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cadence Design Systems has a beta of 0.985, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.488%.

Ansys has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Cadence Design Systems offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Ansys pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Cadence Design Systems pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Ansys quarterly revenues are $504.9M, which are smaller than Cadence Design Systems quarterly revenues of $1.2B. Ansys's net income of $51.9M is lower than Cadence Design Systems's net income of $273.6M. Notably, Ansys's price-to-earnings ratio is 50.95x while Cadence Design Systems's PE ratio is 76.88x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ansys is 11.70x versus 17.06x for Cadence Design Systems. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Inuvo has a net margin of 10.27% compared to Ansys's net margin of -4.72%. Ansys's return on equity of 10.19% beat Inuvo's return on equity of -36.12%.

Ansys has a consensus price target of $347.71, signalling upside risk potential of 1.26%. On the other hand Inuvo has an analysts' consensus of $1.48 which suggests that it could grow by 266.01%. Given that Inuvo has higher upside potential than Ansys, analysts believe Inuvo is more attractive than Ansys.

Ansys has a beta of 1.188, which suggesting that the stock is 18.847% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Inuvo has a beta of 1.556, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 55.648%.

Ansys has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Inuvo offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Ansys pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Inuvo pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Ansys quarterly revenues are $504.9M, which are larger than Inuvo quarterly revenues of $26.7M. Ansys's net income of $51.9M is higher than Inuvo's net income of -$1.3M. Notably, Ansys's price-to-earnings ratio is 50.95x while Inuvo's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ansys is 11.70x versus 0.61x for Inuvo. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Synopsys has a net margin of 10.27% compared to Ansys's net margin of 21.53%. Ansys's return on equity of 10.19% beat Synopsys's return on equity of 25.05%.

Ansys has a consensus price target of $347.71, signalling upside risk potential of 1.26%. On the other hand Synopsys has an analysts' consensus of $586.08 which suggests that it could grow by 18.23%. Given that Synopsys has higher upside potential than Ansys, analysts believe Synopsys is more attractive than Ansys.

Ansys has a beta of 1.188, which suggesting that the stock is 18.847% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Synopsys has a beta of 1.114, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 11.359%.

Ansys has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Synopsys offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Ansys pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Synopsys pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Ansys quarterly revenues are $504.9M, which are smaller than Synopsys quarterly revenues of $1.6B. Ansys's net income of $51.9M is lower than Synopsys's net income of $345.3M. Notably, Ansys's price-to-earnings ratio is 50.95x while Synopsys's PE ratio is 35.78x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ansys is 11.70x versus 12.44x for Synopsys. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.