AGFY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

CEA Industries has a net margin of -964.37% compared to Agrify's net margin of -189.45%. Agrify's return on equity of -- beat CEA Industries's return on equity of -26.82%.

Agrify has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 2555.65%. On the other hand CEA Industries has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Agrify has higher upside potential than CEA Industries, analysts believe Agrify is more attractive than CEA Industries.

Agrify has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CEA Industries has a beta of 1.033, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.25%.

Agrify has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. CEA Industries offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Agrify pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. CEA Industries pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Agrify quarterly revenues are $1.9M, which are larger than CEA Industries quarterly revenues of $390.8K. Agrify's net income of -$18.7M is lower than CEA Industries's net income of -$740.4K. Notably, Agrify's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while CEA Industries's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Agrify is 3.19x versus 2.18x for CEA Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Hydrofarm Holdings Group has a net margin of -964.37% compared to Agrify's net margin of -29.87%. Agrify's return on equity of -- beat Hydrofarm Holdings Group's return on equity of -23.5%.

Agrify has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 2555.65%. On the other hand Hydrofarm Holdings Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 17.25%. Given that Agrify has higher upside potential than Hydrofarm Holdings Group, analysts believe Agrify is more attractive than Hydrofarm Holdings Group.

Agrify has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hydrofarm Holdings Group has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Agrify has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Hydrofarm Holdings Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Agrify pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Hydrofarm Holdings Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Agrify quarterly revenues are $1.9M, which are smaller than Hydrofarm Holdings Group quarterly revenues of $44M. Agrify's net income of -$18.7M is lower than Hydrofarm Holdings Group's net income of -$13.1M. Notably, Agrify's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Hydrofarm Holdings Group's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Agrify is 3.19x versus 0.14x for Hydrofarm Holdings Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Nikola has a net margin of -964.37% compared to Agrify's net margin of -793.38%. Agrify's return on equity of -- beat Nikola's return on equity of -112.88%.

Agrify has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 2555.65%. On the other hand Nikola has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 978.26%. Given that Agrify has higher upside potential than Nikola, analysts believe Agrify is more attractive than Nikola.

Agrify has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Nikola has a beta of 1.920, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 91.977%.

Agrify has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Nikola offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Agrify pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Nikola pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Agrify quarterly revenues are $1.9M, which are smaller than Nikola quarterly revenues of $25.2M. Agrify's net income of -$18.7M is higher than Nikola's net income of -$199.8M. Notably, Agrify's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Nikola's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Agrify is 3.19x versus 0.68x for Nikola. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Urban-gro has a net margin of -964.37% compared to Agrify's net margin of -13.78%. Agrify's return on equity of -- beat Urban-gro's return on equity of -65.43%.

Agrify has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 2555.65%. On the other hand Urban-gro has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Agrify has higher upside potential than Urban-gro, analysts believe Agrify is more attractive than Urban-gro.

Agrify has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Urban-gro has a beta of 1.667, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 66.652%.

Agrify has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Urban-gro offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Agrify pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Urban-gro pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Agrify quarterly revenues are $1.9M, which are smaller than Urban-gro quarterly revenues of $15.5M. Agrify's net income of -$18.7M is lower than Urban-gro's net income of -$2.1M. Notably, Agrify's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Urban-gro's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Agrify is 3.19x versus 0.18x for Urban-gro. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.