AAOI Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Comtech Telecommunications has a net margin of -9.19% compared to Applied Optoelectronics's net margin of -38.51%. Applied Optoelectronics's return on equity of -76.27% beat Comtech Telecommunications's return on equity of -65.2%.

Applied Optoelectronics has a consensus price target of $34.80, signalling upside risk potential of 97.15%. On the other hand Comtech Telecommunications has an analysts' consensus of $5.00 which suggests that it could grow by 140.39%. Given that Comtech Telecommunications has higher upside potential than Applied Optoelectronics, analysts believe Comtech Telecommunications is more attractive than Applied Optoelectronics.

Applied Optoelectronics has a beta of 2.641, which suggesting that the stock is 164.079% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Comtech Telecommunications has a beta of 1.201, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 20.109%.

Applied Optoelectronics has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Comtech Telecommunications offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Applied Optoelectronics pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Comtech Telecommunications pays out -0.27% of its earnings as a dividend.

Applied Optoelectronics quarterly revenues are $99.9M, which are smaller than Comtech Telecommunications quarterly revenues of $126.6M. Applied Optoelectronics's net income of -$9.2M is higher than Comtech Telecommunications's net income of -$48.7M. Notably, Applied Optoelectronics's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Comtech Telecommunications's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Applied Optoelectronics is 2.22x versus 0.12x for Comtech Telecommunications. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Harmonic has a net margin of -9.19% compared to Applied Optoelectronics's net margin of 4.46%. Applied Optoelectronics's return on equity of -76.27% beat Harmonic's return on equity of 12.43%.

Applied Optoelectronics has a consensus price target of $34.80, signalling upside risk potential of 97.15%. On the other hand Harmonic has an analysts' consensus of $11.58 which suggests that it could grow by 28.42%. Given that Applied Optoelectronics has higher upside potential than Harmonic, analysts believe Applied Optoelectronics is more attractive than Harmonic.

Applied Optoelectronics has a beta of 2.641, which suggesting that the stock is 164.079% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Harmonic has a beta of 1.040, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 4.038%.

Applied Optoelectronics has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Harmonic offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Applied Optoelectronics pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Harmonic pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Applied Optoelectronics quarterly revenues are $99.9M, which are smaller than Harmonic quarterly revenues of $133.1M. Applied Optoelectronics's net income of -$9.2M is lower than Harmonic's net income of $5.9M. Notably, Applied Optoelectronics's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Harmonic's PE ratio is 20.04x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Applied Optoelectronics is 2.22x versus 1.53x for Harmonic. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Inseego has a net margin of -9.19% compared to Applied Optoelectronics's net margin of -4.96%. Applied Optoelectronics's return on equity of -76.27% beat Inseego's return on equity of --.

Applied Optoelectronics has a consensus price target of $34.80, signalling upside risk potential of 97.15%. On the other hand Inseego has an analysts' consensus of $11.50 which suggests that it could grow by 53.74%. Given that Applied Optoelectronics has higher upside potential than Inseego, analysts believe Applied Optoelectronics is more attractive than Inseego.

Applied Optoelectronics has a beta of 2.641, which suggesting that the stock is 164.079% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Inseego has a beta of 1.137, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 13.741%.

Applied Optoelectronics has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Inseego offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Applied Optoelectronics pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Inseego pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Applied Optoelectronics quarterly revenues are $99.9M, which are larger than Inseego quarterly revenues of $31.7M. Applied Optoelectronics's net income of -$9.2M is lower than Inseego's net income of -$1.6M. Notably, Applied Optoelectronics's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Inseego's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Applied Optoelectronics is 2.22x versus 0.52x for Inseego. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Viavi Solutions has a net margin of -9.19% compared to Applied Optoelectronics's net margin of 6.85%. Applied Optoelectronics's return on equity of -76.27% beat Viavi Solutions's return on equity of 0.73%.

Applied Optoelectronics has a consensus price target of $34.80, signalling upside risk potential of 97.15%. On the other hand Viavi Solutions has an analysts' consensus of $12.26 which suggests that it could grow by 34.61%. Given that Applied Optoelectronics has higher upside potential than Viavi Solutions, analysts believe Applied Optoelectronics is more attractive than Viavi Solutions.

Applied Optoelectronics has a beta of 2.641, which suggesting that the stock is 164.079% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Viavi Solutions has a beta of 0.866, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 13.43%.

Applied Optoelectronics has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Viavi Solutions offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Applied Optoelectronics pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Viavi Solutions pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Applied Optoelectronics quarterly revenues are $99.9M, which are smaller than Viavi Solutions quarterly revenues of $284.8M. Applied Optoelectronics's net income of -$9.2M is lower than Viavi Solutions's net income of $19.5M. Notably, Applied Optoelectronics's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Viavi Solutions's PE ratio is 455.50x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Applied Optoelectronics is 2.22x versus 1.95x for Viavi Solutions. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.