SNA Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Hyster Yale has a net margin of 21.08% compared to Snap-on's net margin of 0.95%. Snap-on's return on equity of 18.95% beat Hyster Yale's return on equity of 20.01%.

Snap-on has a consensus price target of $321.39, signalling upside risk potential of 0.41%. On the other hand Hyster Yale has an analysts' consensus of $56.00 which suggests that it could grow by 37.09%. Given that Hyster Yale has higher upside potential than Snap-on, analysts believe Hyster Yale is more attractive than Snap-on.

Snap-on has a beta of 0.781, which suggesting that the stock is 21.916% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hyster Yale has a beta of 1.513, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 51.33%.

Snap-on has a quarterly dividend of $2.14 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.59%. Hyster Yale offers a yield of 3.45% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.36 per share. Snap-on pays 38.93% of its earnings as a dividend. Hyster Yale pays out 16.87% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Snap-on quarterly revenues are $1.1B, which are larger than Hyster Yale quarterly revenues of $910.4M. Snap-on's net income of $240.5M is higher than Hyster Yale's net income of $8.6M. Notably, Snap-on's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.76x while Hyster Yale's PE ratio is 7.29x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Snap-on is 3.66x versus 0.17x for Hyster Yale. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Kennametal has a net margin of 21.08% compared to Snap-on's net margin of 6.47%. Snap-on's return on equity of 18.95% beat Kennametal's return on equity of 8.43%.

Snap-on has a consensus price target of $321.39, signalling upside risk potential of 0.41%. On the other hand Kennametal has an analysts' consensus of $21.69 which suggests that it could grow by 0.17%. Given that Snap-on has higher upside potential than Kennametal, analysts believe Snap-on is more attractive than Kennametal.

Snap-on has a beta of 0.781, which suggesting that the stock is 21.916% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kennametal has a beta of 1.398, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 39.801%.

Snap-on has a quarterly dividend of $2.14 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.59%. Kennametal offers a yield of 3.7% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share. Snap-on pays 38.93% of its earnings as a dividend. Kennametal pays out 58.02% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Snap-on quarterly revenues are $1.1B, which are larger than Kennametal quarterly revenues of $486.4M. Snap-on's net income of $240.5M is higher than Kennametal's net income of $31.5M. Notably, Snap-on's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.76x while Kennametal's PE ratio is 15.58x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Snap-on is 3.66x versus 0.85x for Kennametal. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lincoln Electric Holdings has a net margin of 21.08% compared to Snap-on's net margin of 11.8%. Snap-on's return on equity of 18.95% beat Lincoln Electric Holdings's return on equity of 34.79%.

Snap-on has a consensus price target of $321.39, signalling upside risk potential of 0.41%. On the other hand Lincoln Electric Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $209.89 which suggests that it could grow by 7.43%. Given that Lincoln Electric Holdings has higher upside potential than Snap-on, analysts believe Lincoln Electric Holdings is more attractive than Snap-on.

Snap-on has a beta of 0.781, which suggesting that the stock is 21.916% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lincoln Electric Holdings has a beta of 1.196, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 19.616%.

Snap-on has a quarterly dividend of $2.14 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.59%. Lincoln Electric Holdings offers a yield of 1.5% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.75 per share. Snap-on pays 38.93% of its earnings as a dividend. Lincoln Electric Holdings pays out 34.79% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Snap-on quarterly revenues are $1.1B, which are larger than Lincoln Electric Holdings quarterly revenues of $1B. Snap-on's net income of $240.5M is higher than Lincoln Electric Holdings's net income of $118.5M. Notably, Snap-on's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.76x while Lincoln Electric Holdings's PE ratio is 24.09x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Snap-on is 3.66x versus 2.76x for Lincoln Electric Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

The Middleby has a net margin of 21.08% compared to Snap-on's net margin of 10.19%. Snap-on's return on equity of 18.95% beat The Middleby's return on equity of 12.27%.

Snap-on has a consensus price target of $321.39, signalling upside risk potential of 0.41%. On the other hand The Middleby has an analysts' consensus of $169.00 which suggests that it could grow by 14.35%. Given that The Middleby has higher upside potential than Snap-on, analysts believe The Middleby is more attractive than Snap-on.

Snap-on has a beta of 0.781, which suggesting that the stock is 21.916% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Middleby has a beta of 1.606, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 60.598%.

Snap-on has a quarterly dividend of $2.14 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.59%. The Middleby offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Snap-on pays 38.93% of its earnings as a dividend. The Middleby pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Snap-on's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Snap-on quarterly revenues are $1.1B, which are larger than The Middleby quarterly revenues of $906.6M. Snap-on's net income of $240.5M is higher than The Middleby's net income of $92.4M. Notably, Snap-on's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.76x while The Middleby's PE ratio is 18.47x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Snap-on is 3.66x versus 2.08x for The Middleby. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.