HY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

American Superconductor has a net margin of 0.95% compared to Hyster Yale's net margin of 1.81%. Hyster Yale's return on equity of 20.01% beat American Superconductor's return on equity of 3.49%.

Hyster Yale has a consensus price target of $56.00, signalling upside risk potential of 39.58%. On the other hand American Superconductor has an analysts' consensus of $39.00 which suggests that it could grow by 6.33%. Given that Hyster Yale has higher upside potential than American Superconductor, analysts believe Hyster Yale is more attractive than American Superconductor.

Hyster Yale has a beta of 1.513, which suggesting that the stock is 51.33% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison American Superconductor has a beta of 2.874, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 187.359%.

Hyster Yale has a quarterly dividend of $0.36 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.52%. American Superconductor offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Hyster Yale pays 16.87% of its earnings as a dividend. American Superconductor pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Hyster Yale's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Hyster Yale quarterly revenues are $910.4M, which are larger than American Superconductor quarterly revenues of $66.7M. Hyster Yale's net income of $8.6M is higher than American Superconductor's net income of $1.2M. Notably, Hyster Yale's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.16x while American Superconductor's PE ratio is 244.53x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hyster Yale is 0.17x versus 6.18x for American Superconductor. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Kennametal has a net margin of 0.95% compared to Hyster Yale's net margin of 6.47%. Hyster Yale's return on equity of 20.01% beat Kennametal's return on equity of 8.43%.

Hyster Yale has a consensus price target of $56.00, signalling upside risk potential of 39.58%. On the other hand Kennametal has an analysts' consensus of $22.19 which suggests that it could fall by -4.65%. Given that Hyster Yale has higher upside potential than Kennametal, analysts believe Hyster Yale is more attractive than Kennametal.

Hyster Yale has a beta of 1.513, which suggesting that the stock is 51.33% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kennametal has a beta of 1.398, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 39.801%.

Hyster Yale has a quarterly dividend of $0.36 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.52%. Kennametal offers a yield of 3.44% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share. Hyster Yale pays 16.87% of its earnings as a dividend. Kennametal pays out 58.02% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Hyster Yale quarterly revenues are $910.4M, which are larger than Kennametal quarterly revenues of $486.4M. Hyster Yale's net income of $8.6M is lower than Kennametal's net income of $31.5M. Notably, Hyster Yale's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.16x while Kennametal's PE ratio is 16.74x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hyster Yale is 0.17x versus 0.92x for Kennametal. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lincoln Electric Holdings has a net margin of 0.95% compared to Hyster Yale's net margin of 11.8%. Hyster Yale's return on equity of 20.01% beat Lincoln Electric Holdings's return on equity of 34.79%.

Hyster Yale has a consensus price target of $56.00, signalling upside risk potential of 39.58%. On the other hand Lincoln Electric Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $209.89 which suggests that it could fall by -0.71%. Given that Hyster Yale has higher upside potential than Lincoln Electric Holdings, analysts believe Hyster Yale is more attractive than Lincoln Electric Holdings.

Hyster Yale has a beta of 1.513, which suggesting that the stock is 51.33% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lincoln Electric Holdings has a beta of 1.196, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 19.616%.

Hyster Yale has a quarterly dividend of $0.36 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.52%. Lincoln Electric Holdings offers a yield of 1.38% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.75 per share. Hyster Yale pays 16.87% of its earnings as a dividend. Lincoln Electric Holdings pays out 34.79% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Hyster Yale quarterly revenues are $910.4M, which are smaller than Lincoln Electric Holdings quarterly revenues of $1B. Hyster Yale's net income of $8.6M is lower than Lincoln Electric Holdings's net income of $118.5M. Notably, Hyster Yale's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.16x while Lincoln Electric Holdings's PE ratio is 26.06x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hyster Yale is 0.17x versus 2.98x for Lincoln Electric Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Terex has a net margin of 0.95% compared to Hyster Yale's net margin of 1.71%. Hyster Yale's return on equity of 20.01% beat Terex's return on equity of 13.48%.

Hyster Yale has a consensus price target of $56.00, signalling upside risk potential of 39.58%. On the other hand Terex has an analysts' consensus of $49.95 which suggests that it could grow by 4.75%. Given that Hyster Yale has higher upside potential than Terex, analysts believe Hyster Yale is more attractive than Terex.

Hyster Yale has a beta of 1.513, which suggesting that the stock is 51.33% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Terex has a beta of 1.605, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 60.48%.

Hyster Yale has a quarterly dividend of $0.36 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.52%. Terex offers a yield of 1.43% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share. Hyster Yale pays 16.87% of its earnings as a dividend. Terex pays out 13.73% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Hyster Yale quarterly revenues are $910.4M, which are smaller than Terex quarterly revenues of $1.2B. Hyster Yale's net income of $8.6M is lower than Terex's net income of $21M. Notably, Hyster Yale's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.16x while Terex's PE ratio is 12.99x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hyster Yale is 0.17x versus 0.63x for Terex. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.