SLG Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

First Industrial Realty Trust has a net margin of -6.33% compared to SL Green Realty's net margin of 27.17%. SL Green Realty's return on equity of -0.08% beat First Industrial Realty Trust's return on equity of 9.86%.

SL Green Realty has a consensus price target of $62.78, signalling downside risk potential of -2.46%. On the other hand First Industrial Realty Trust has an analysts' consensus of $55.00 which suggests that it could grow by 10.33%. Given that First Industrial Realty Trust has higher upside potential than SL Green Realty, analysts believe First Industrial Realty Trust is more attractive than SL Green Realty.

SL Green Realty has a beta of 1.643, which suggesting that the stock is 64.268% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison First Industrial Realty Trust has a beta of 1.085, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.481%.

SL Green Realty has a quarterly dividend of $0.26 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.73%. First Industrial Realty Trust offers a yield of 3.12% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.45 per share. SL Green Realty pays 713.87% of its earnings as a dividend. First Industrial Realty Trust pays out 67.29% of its earnings as a dividend. First Industrial Realty Trust's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but SL Green Realty's is not.

SL Green Realty quarterly revenues are $239.8M, which are larger than First Industrial Realty Trust quarterly revenues of $177.1M. SL Green Realty's net income of -$15.2M is lower than First Industrial Realty Trust's net income of $48.1M. Notably, SL Green Realty's price-to-earnings ratio is 654.88x while First Industrial Realty Trust's PE ratio is 24.68x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SL Green Realty is 4.69x versus 9.65x for First Industrial Realty Trust. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

National Health Investors has a net margin of -6.33% compared to SL Green Realty's net margin of 38.26%. SL Green Realty's return on equity of -0.08% beat National Health Investors's return on equity of 10.68%.

SL Green Realty has a consensus price target of $62.78, signalling downside risk potential of -2.46%. On the other hand National Health Investors has an analysts' consensus of $80.71 which suggests that it could grow by 11.32%. Given that National Health Investors has higher upside potential than SL Green Realty, analysts believe National Health Investors is more attractive than SL Green Realty.

SL Green Realty has a beta of 1.643, which suggesting that the stock is 64.268% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison National Health Investors has a beta of 0.749, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 25.101%.

SL Green Realty has a quarterly dividend of $0.26 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.73%. National Health Investors offers a yield of 4.97% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.90 per share. SL Green Realty pays 713.87% of its earnings as a dividend. National Health Investors pays out 113.43% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

SL Green Realty quarterly revenues are $239.8M, which are larger than National Health Investors quarterly revenues of $89.3M. SL Green Realty's net income of -$15.2M is lower than National Health Investors's net income of $34.2M. Notably, SL Green Realty's price-to-earnings ratio is 654.88x while National Health Investors's PE ratio is 23.02x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SL Green Realty is 4.69x versus 9.45x for National Health Investors. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Prologis has a net margin of -6.33% compared to SL Green Realty's net margin of 27.71%. SL Green Realty's return on equity of -0.08% beat Prologis's return on equity of 6.45%.

SL Green Realty has a consensus price target of $62.78, signalling downside risk potential of -2.46%. On the other hand Prologis has an analysts' consensus of $117.15 which suggests that it could grow by 7.69%. Given that Prologis has higher upside potential than SL Green Realty, analysts believe Prologis is more attractive than SL Green Realty.

SL Green Realty has a beta of 1.643, which suggesting that the stock is 64.268% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Prologis has a beta of 1.254, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 25.436%.

SL Green Realty has a quarterly dividend of $0.26 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.73%. Prologis offers a yield of 3.58% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.01 per share. SL Green Realty pays 713.87% of its earnings as a dividend. Prologis pays out 95.68% of its earnings as a dividend. Prologis's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but SL Green Realty's is not.

SL Green Realty quarterly revenues are $239.8M, which are smaller than Prologis quarterly revenues of $2.1B. SL Green Realty's net income of -$15.2M is lower than Prologis's net income of $593M. Notably, SL Green Realty's price-to-earnings ratio is 654.88x while Prologis's PE ratio is 27.13x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SL Green Realty is 4.69x versus 12.38x for Prologis. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Welltower has a net margin of -6.33% compared to SL Green Realty's net margin of 10.8%. SL Green Realty's return on equity of -0.08% beat Welltower's return on equity of 3.46%.

SL Green Realty has a consensus price target of $62.78, signalling downside risk potential of -2.46%. On the other hand Welltower has an analysts' consensus of $167.15 which suggests that it could grow by 8.77%. Given that Welltower has higher upside potential than SL Green Realty, analysts believe Welltower is more attractive than SL Green Realty.

SL Green Realty has a beta of 1.643, which suggesting that the stock is 64.268% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Welltower has a beta of 0.937, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 6.344%.

SL Green Realty has a quarterly dividend of $0.26 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.73%. Welltower offers a yield of 1.74% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.67 per share. SL Green Realty pays 713.87% of its earnings as a dividend. Welltower pays out 162.37% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

SL Green Realty quarterly revenues are $239.8M, which are smaller than Welltower quarterly revenues of $2.4B. SL Green Realty's net income of -$15.2M is lower than Welltower's net income of $258M. Notably, SL Green Realty's price-to-earnings ratio is 654.88x while Welltower's PE ratio is 88.76x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SL Green Realty is 4.69x versus 11.53x for Welltower. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.