SEE Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Booking Holdings has a net margin of 8.92% compared to Sealed Air's net margin of 6.99%. Sealed Air's return on equity of 43.03% beat Booking Holdings's return on equity of --.

Sealed Air has a consensus price target of $37.15, signalling upside risk potential of 20.07%. On the other hand Booking Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $5,583.99 which suggests that it could grow by 1.8%. Given that Sealed Air has higher upside potential than Booking Holdings, analysts believe Sealed Air is more attractive than Booking Holdings.

Sealed Air has a beta of 1.372, which suggesting that the stock is 37.248% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Booking Holdings has a beta of 1.408, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 40.757%.

Sealed Air has a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.59%. Booking Holdings offers a yield of 0.67% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $9.60 per share. Sealed Air pays 44.58% of its earnings as a dividend. Booking Holdings pays out 19.96% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Sealed Air quarterly revenues are $1.3B, which are smaller than Booking Holdings quarterly revenues of $4.8B. Sealed Air's net income of $113.5M is lower than Booking Holdings's net income of $333M. Notably, Sealed Air's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.32x while Booking Holdings's PE ratio is 34.13x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sealed Air is 0.85x versus 7.67x for Booking Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Expedia Group has a net margin of 8.92% compared to Sealed Air's net margin of -6.69%. Sealed Air's return on equity of 43.03% beat Expedia Group's return on equity of 48.92%.

Sealed Air has a consensus price target of $37.15, signalling upside risk potential of 20.07%. On the other hand Expedia Group has an analysts' consensus of $188.25 which suggests that it could grow by 13.58%. Given that Sealed Air has higher upside potential than Expedia Group, analysts believe Sealed Air is more attractive than Expedia Group.

Sealed Air has a beta of 1.372, which suggesting that the stock is 37.248% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Expedia Group has a beta of 1.594, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 59.39%.

Sealed Air has a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.59%. Expedia Group offers a yield of 0.48% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share. Sealed Air pays 44.58% of its earnings as a dividend. Expedia Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Sealed Air's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Sealed Air quarterly revenues are $1.3B, which are smaller than Expedia Group quarterly revenues of $3B. Sealed Air's net income of $113.5M is higher than Expedia Group's net income of -$200M. Notably, Sealed Air's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.32x while Expedia Group's PE ratio is 19.55x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sealed Air is 0.85x versus 1.62x for Expedia Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lindblad Expeditions Holdings has a net margin of 8.92% compared to Sealed Air's net margin of 0.65%. Sealed Air's return on equity of 43.03% beat Lindblad Expeditions Holdings's return on equity of --.

Sealed Air has a consensus price target of $37.15, signalling upside risk potential of 20.07%. On the other hand Lindblad Expeditions Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $15.00 which suggests that it could grow by 35.38%. Given that Lindblad Expeditions Holdings has higher upside potential than Sealed Air, analysts believe Lindblad Expeditions Holdings is more attractive than Sealed Air.

Sealed Air has a beta of 1.372, which suggesting that the stock is 37.248% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lindblad Expeditions Holdings has a beta of 2.646, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 164.634%.

Sealed Air has a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.59%. Lindblad Expeditions Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Sealed Air pays 44.58% of its earnings as a dividend. Lindblad Expeditions Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Sealed Air's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Sealed Air quarterly revenues are $1.3B, which are larger than Lindblad Expeditions Holdings quarterly revenues of $179.7M. Sealed Air's net income of $113.5M is higher than Lindblad Expeditions Holdings's net income of $1.2M. Notably, Sealed Air's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.32x while Lindblad Expeditions Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sealed Air is 0.85x versus 0.93x for Lindblad Expeditions Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tripadvisor has a net margin of 8.92% compared to Sealed Air's net margin of -2.76%. Sealed Air's return on equity of 43.03% beat Tripadvisor's return on equity of 6.29%.

Sealed Air has a consensus price target of $37.15, signalling upside risk potential of 20.07%. On the other hand Tripadvisor has an analysts' consensus of $16.88 which suggests that it could grow by 35%. Given that Tripadvisor has higher upside potential than Sealed Air, analysts believe Tripadvisor is more attractive than Sealed Air.

Sealed Air has a beta of 1.372, which suggesting that the stock is 37.248% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tripadvisor has a beta of 1.321, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 32.054%.

Sealed Air has a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.59%. Tripadvisor offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Sealed Air pays 44.58% of its earnings as a dividend. Tripadvisor pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Sealed Air's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Sealed Air quarterly revenues are $1.3B, which are larger than Tripadvisor quarterly revenues of $398M. Sealed Air's net income of $113.5M is higher than Tripadvisor's net income of -$11M. Notably, Sealed Air's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.32x while Tripadvisor's PE ratio is 33.78x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sealed Air is 0.85x versus 0.98x for Tripadvisor. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.