LIND Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Consolidated Capital Of North America has a net margin of 0.65% compared to Lindblad Expeditions Holdings's net margin of --. Lindblad Expeditions Holdings's return on equity of -- beat Consolidated Capital Of North America's return on equity of --.

Lindblad Expeditions Holdings has a consensus price target of $15.00, signalling upside risk potential of 43.68%. On the other hand Consolidated Capital Of North America has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Lindblad Expeditions Holdings has higher upside potential than Consolidated Capital Of North America, analysts believe Lindblad Expeditions Holdings is more attractive than Consolidated Capital Of North America.

Lindblad Expeditions Holdings has a beta of 2.650, which suggesting that the stock is 164.981% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Consolidated Capital Of North America has a beta of 7.790, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 679.043%.

Lindblad Expeditions Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Consolidated Capital Of North America offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Lindblad Expeditions Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Consolidated Capital Of North America pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Lindblad Expeditions Holdings quarterly revenues are $179.7M, which are larger than Consolidated Capital Of North America quarterly revenues of --. Lindblad Expeditions Holdings's net income of $1.2M is higher than Consolidated Capital Of North America's net income of --. Notably, Lindblad Expeditions Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Consolidated Capital Of North America's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lindblad Expeditions Holdings is 0.88x versus -- for Consolidated Capital Of North America. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Expedia Group has a net margin of 0.65% compared to Lindblad Expeditions Holdings's net margin of 9.39%. Lindblad Expeditions Holdings's return on equity of -- beat Expedia Group's return on equity of 49.71%.

Lindblad Expeditions Holdings has a consensus price target of $15.00, signalling upside risk potential of 43.68%. On the other hand Expedia Group has an analysts' consensus of $190.39 which suggests that it could grow by 21.53%. Given that Lindblad Expeditions Holdings has higher upside potential than Expedia Group, analysts believe Lindblad Expeditions Holdings is more attractive than Expedia Group.

Lindblad Expeditions Holdings has a beta of 2.650, which suggesting that the stock is 164.981% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Expedia Group has a beta of 1.619, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 61.927%.

Lindblad Expeditions Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Expedia Group offers a yield of 0.26% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share. Lindblad Expeditions Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Expedia Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Lindblad Expeditions Holdings quarterly revenues are $179.7M, which are smaller than Expedia Group quarterly revenues of $3.2B. Lindblad Expeditions Holdings's net income of $1.2M is lower than Expedia Group's net income of $299M. Notably, Lindblad Expeditions Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Expedia Group's PE ratio is 17.31x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lindblad Expeditions Holdings is 0.88x versus 1.56x for Expedia Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Global Business Travel Group has a net margin of 0.65% compared to Lindblad Expeditions Holdings's net margin of 12.08%. Lindblad Expeditions Holdings's return on equity of -- beat Global Business Travel Group's return on equity of -3.87%.

Lindblad Expeditions Holdings has a consensus price target of $15.00, signalling upside risk potential of 43.68%. On the other hand Global Business Travel Group has an analysts' consensus of $9.23 which suggests that it could grow by 58.38%. Given that Global Business Travel Group has higher upside potential than Lindblad Expeditions Holdings, analysts believe Global Business Travel Group is more attractive than Lindblad Expeditions Holdings.

Lindblad Expeditions Holdings has a beta of 2.650, which suggesting that the stock is 164.981% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Global Business Travel Group has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Lindblad Expeditions Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Global Business Travel Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Lindblad Expeditions Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Global Business Travel Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Lindblad Expeditions Holdings quarterly revenues are $179.7M, which are smaller than Global Business Travel Group quarterly revenues of $621M. Lindblad Expeditions Holdings's net income of $1.2M is lower than Global Business Travel Group's net income of $75M. Notably, Lindblad Expeditions Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Global Business Travel Group's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lindblad Expeditions Holdings is 0.88x versus 1.12x for Global Business Travel Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Inspirato has a net margin of 0.65% compared to Lindblad Expeditions Holdings's net margin of -3.62%. Lindblad Expeditions Holdings's return on equity of -- beat Inspirato's return on equity of --.

Lindblad Expeditions Holdings has a consensus price target of $15.00, signalling upside risk potential of 43.68%. On the other hand Inspirato has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 209.97%. Given that Inspirato has higher upside potential than Lindblad Expeditions Holdings, analysts believe Inspirato is more attractive than Lindblad Expeditions Holdings.

Lindblad Expeditions Holdings has a beta of 2.650, which suggesting that the stock is 164.981% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Inspirato has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Lindblad Expeditions Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Inspirato offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Lindblad Expeditions Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Inspirato pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Lindblad Expeditions Holdings quarterly revenues are $179.7M, which are larger than Inspirato quarterly revenues of $63.1M. Lindblad Expeditions Holdings's net income of $1.2M is higher than Inspirato's net income of -$2.3M. Notably, Lindblad Expeditions Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Inspirato's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lindblad Expeditions Holdings is 0.88x versus 0.09x for Inspirato. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.