LIND Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Expedia Group has a net margin of 0.65% compared to Lindblad Expeditions Holdings's net margin of -6.69%. Lindblad Expeditions Holdings's return on equity of -- beat Expedia Group's return on equity of 48.92%.

Lindblad Expeditions Holdings has a consensus price target of $15.00, signalling upside risk potential of 16.64%. On the other hand Expedia Group has an analysts' consensus of $189.10 which suggests that it could grow by 2.98%. Given that Lindblad Expeditions Holdings has higher upside potential than Expedia Group, analysts believe Lindblad Expeditions Holdings is more attractive than Expedia Group.

Lindblad Expeditions Holdings has a beta of 2.646, which suggesting that the stock is 164.59% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Expedia Group has a beta of 1.574, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 57.436%.

Lindblad Expeditions Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Expedia Group offers a yield of 0.44% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share. Lindblad Expeditions Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Expedia Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Lindblad Expeditions Holdings quarterly revenues are $179.7M, which are smaller than Expedia Group quarterly revenues of $3B. Lindblad Expeditions Holdings's net income of $1.2M is higher than Expedia Group's net income of -$200M. Notably, Lindblad Expeditions Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Expedia Group's PE ratio is 21.66x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lindblad Expeditions Holdings is 1.08x versus 1.79x for Expedia Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Hilton Grand Vacations has a net margin of 0.65% compared to Lindblad Expeditions Holdings's net margin of -1.48%. Lindblad Expeditions Holdings's return on equity of -- beat Hilton Grand Vacations's return on equity of 1.73%.

Lindblad Expeditions Holdings has a consensus price target of $15.00, signalling upside risk potential of 16.64%. On the other hand Hilton Grand Vacations has an analysts' consensus of $48.17 which suggests that it could fall by -0.75%. Given that Lindblad Expeditions Holdings has higher upside potential than Hilton Grand Vacations, analysts believe Lindblad Expeditions Holdings is more attractive than Hilton Grand Vacations.

Lindblad Expeditions Holdings has a beta of 2.646, which suggesting that the stock is 164.59% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hilton Grand Vacations has a beta of 1.635, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 63.513%.

Lindblad Expeditions Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Hilton Grand Vacations offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Lindblad Expeditions Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Hilton Grand Vacations pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Lindblad Expeditions Holdings quarterly revenues are $179.7M, which are smaller than Hilton Grand Vacations quarterly revenues of $1.1B. Lindblad Expeditions Holdings's net income of $1.2M is higher than Hilton Grand Vacations's net income of -$17M. Notably, Lindblad Expeditions Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Hilton Grand Vacations's PE ratio is 151.66x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lindblad Expeditions Holdings is 1.08x versus 0.98x for Hilton Grand Vacations. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Inspirato has a net margin of 0.65% compared to Lindblad Expeditions Holdings's net margin of 2.46%. Lindblad Expeditions Holdings's return on equity of -- beat Inspirato's return on equity of --.

Lindblad Expeditions Holdings has a consensus price target of $15.00, signalling upside risk potential of 16.64%. On the other hand Inspirato has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 212.5%. Given that Inspirato has higher upside potential than Lindblad Expeditions Holdings, analysts believe Inspirato is more attractive than Lindblad Expeditions Holdings.

Lindblad Expeditions Holdings has a beta of 2.646, which suggesting that the stock is 164.59% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Inspirato has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Lindblad Expeditions Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Inspirato offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Lindblad Expeditions Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Inspirato pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Lindblad Expeditions Holdings quarterly revenues are $179.7M, which are larger than Inspirato quarterly revenues of $65.9M. Lindblad Expeditions Holdings's net income of $1.2M is lower than Inspirato's net income of $1.6M. Notably, Lindblad Expeditions Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Inspirato's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lindblad Expeditions Holdings is 1.08x versus 0.12x for Inspirato. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Standard Motor Products has a net margin of 0.65% compared to Lindblad Expeditions Holdings's net margin of 3.04%. Lindblad Expeditions Holdings's return on equity of -- beat Standard Motor Products's return on equity of 4.81%.

Lindblad Expeditions Holdings has a consensus price target of $15.00, signalling upside risk potential of 16.64%. On the other hand Standard Motor Products has an analysts' consensus of $40.50 which suggests that it could grow by 23.06%. Given that Standard Motor Products has higher upside potential than Lindblad Expeditions Holdings, analysts believe Standard Motor Products is more attractive than Lindblad Expeditions Holdings.

Lindblad Expeditions Holdings has a beta of 2.646, which suggesting that the stock is 164.59% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Standard Motor Products has a beta of 0.653, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 34.654%.

Lindblad Expeditions Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Standard Motor Products offers a yield of 3.65% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.31 per share. Lindblad Expeditions Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Standard Motor Products pays out 92.15% of its earnings as a dividend. Standard Motor Products's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Lindblad Expeditions Holdings quarterly revenues are $179.7M, which are smaller than Standard Motor Products quarterly revenues of $413.4M. Lindblad Expeditions Holdings's net income of $1.2M is lower than Standard Motor Products's net income of $12.6M. Notably, Lindblad Expeditions Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Standard Motor Products's PE ratio is 23.51x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lindblad Expeditions Holdings is 1.08x versus 0.47x for Standard Motor Products. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.