RIG Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

EOG Resources has a net margin of -8.72% compared to Transocean's net margin of 25.04%. Transocean's return on equity of -6.63% beat EOG Resources's return on equity of 20.78%.

Transocean has a consensus price target of $4.09, signalling upside risk potential of 23.06%. On the other hand EOG Resources has an analysts' consensus of $140.10 which suggests that it could grow by 11.83%. Given that Transocean has higher upside potential than EOG Resources, analysts believe Transocean is more attractive than EOG Resources.

Transocean has a beta of 2.544, which suggesting that the stock is 154.401% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison EOG Resources has a beta of 0.746, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 25.354%.

Transocean has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. EOG Resources offers a yield of 3.01% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.98 per share. Transocean pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. EOG Resources pays out 32.59% of its earnings as a dividend. EOG Resources's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Transocean quarterly revenues are $906M, which are smaller than EOG Resources quarterly revenues of $5.8B. Transocean's net income of -$79M is lower than EOG Resources's net income of $1.5B. Notably, Transocean's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while EOG Resources's PE ratio is 11.62x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Transocean is 0.84x versus 3.01x for EOG Resources. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Diamondback Energy has a net margin of -8.72% compared to Transocean's net margin of 34.86%. Transocean's return on equity of -6.63% beat Diamondback Energy's return on equity of 12.66%.

Transocean has a consensus price target of $4.09, signalling upside risk potential of 23.06%. On the other hand Diamondback Energy has an analysts' consensus of $181.84 which suggests that it could grow by 17.39%. Given that Transocean has higher upside potential than Diamondback Energy, analysts believe Transocean is more attractive than Diamondback Energy.

Transocean has a beta of 2.544, which suggesting that the stock is 154.401% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Diamondback Energy has a beta of 1.062, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 6.189%.

Transocean has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Diamondback Energy offers a yield of 3.38% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.00 per share. Transocean pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Diamondback Energy pays out 47.27% of its earnings as a dividend. Diamondback Energy's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Transocean quarterly revenues are $906M, which are smaller than Diamondback Energy quarterly revenues of $4B. Transocean's net income of -$79M is lower than Diamondback Energy's net income of $1.4B. Notably, Transocean's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Diamondback Energy's PE ratio is 9.47x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Transocean is 0.84x versus 2.91x for Diamondback Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Leopard Energy has a net margin of -8.72% compared to Transocean's net margin of -1621.32%. Transocean's return on equity of -6.63% beat Leopard Energy's return on equity of -1169.22%.

Transocean has a consensus price target of $4.09, signalling upside risk potential of 23.06%. On the other hand Leopard Energy has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Transocean has higher upside potential than Leopard Energy, analysts believe Transocean is more attractive than Leopard Energy.

Transocean has a beta of 2.544, which suggesting that the stock is 154.401% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Leopard Energy has a beta of -0.489, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 148.863%.

Transocean has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Leopard Energy offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Transocean pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Leopard Energy pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Transocean quarterly revenues are $906M, which are larger than Leopard Energy quarterly revenues of $1.5K. Transocean's net income of -$79M is lower than Leopard Energy's net income of -$24.3K. Notably, Transocean's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Leopard Energy's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Transocean is 0.84x versus 38.60x for Leopard Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Exxon Mobil has a net margin of -8.72% compared to Transocean's net margin of 9.52%. Transocean's return on equity of -6.63% beat Exxon Mobil's return on equity of 12.7%.

Transocean has a consensus price target of $4.09, signalling upside risk potential of 23.06%. On the other hand Exxon Mobil has an analysts' consensus of $123.65 which suggests that it could grow by 10.28%. Given that Transocean has higher upside potential than Exxon Mobil, analysts believe Transocean is more attractive than Exxon Mobil.

Transocean has a beta of 2.544, which suggesting that the stock is 154.401% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Exxon Mobil has a beta of 0.493, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 50.672%.

Transocean has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Exxon Mobil offers a yield of 3.5% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.99 per share. Transocean pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Exxon Mobil pays out 49.6% of its earnings as a dividend. Exxon Mobil's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Transocean quarterly revenues are $906M, which are smaller than Exxon Mobil quarterly revenues of $81.1B. Transocean's net income of -$79M is lower than Exxon Mobil's net income of $7.7B. Notably, Transocean's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Exxon Mobil's PE ratio is 14.87x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Transocean is 0.84x versus 1.45x for Exxon Mobil. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.