RIG Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Chevron has a net margin of -8.72% compared to Transocean's net margin of 7.59%. Transocean's return on equity of -6.63% beat Chevron's return on equity of 10.01%.

Transocean has a consensus price target of $4.21, signalling upside risk potential of 69.11%. On the other hand Chevron has an analysts' consensus of $162.46 which suggests that it could grow by 18.85%. Given that Transocean has higher upside potential than Chevron, analysts believe Transocean is more attractive than Chevron.

Transocean has a beta of 2.519, which suggesting that the stock is 151.943% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Chevron has a beta of 0.833, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 16.684%.

Transocean has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Chevron offers a yield of 4.89% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.71 per share. Transocean pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Chevron pays out 66.82% of its earnings as a dividend. Chevron's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Transocean quarterly revenues are $906M, which are smaller than Chevron quarterly revenues of $46.1B. Transocean's net income of -$79M is lower than Chevron's net income of $3.5B. Notably, Transocean's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Chevron's PE ratio is 15.62x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Transocean is 0.63x versus 1.27x for Chevron. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

EOG Resources has a net margin of -8.72% compared to Transocean's net margin of 25.04%. Transocean's return on equity of -6.63% beat EOG Resources's return on equity of 20.78%.

Transocean has a consensus price target of $4.21, signalling upside risk potential of 69.11%. On the other hand EOG Resources has an analysts' consensus of $136.91 which suggests that it could grow by 26.1%. Given that Transocean has higher upside potential than EOG Resources, analysts believe Transocean is more attractive than EOG Resources.

Transocean has a beta of 2.519, which suggesting that the stock is 151.943% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison EOG Resources has a beta of 0.782, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 21.762%.

Transocean has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. EOG Resources offers a yield of 3.47% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.98 per share. Transocean pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. EOG Resources pays out 32.59% of its earnings as a dividend. EOG Resources's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Transocean quarterly revenues are $906M, which are smaller than EOG Resources quarterly revenues of $5.8B. Transocean's net income of -$79M is lower than EOG Resources's net income of $1.5B. Notably, Transocean's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while EOG Resources's PE ratio is 10.07x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Transocean is 0.63x versus 2.61x for EOG Resources. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Leopard Energy has a net margin of -8.72% compared to Transocean's net margin of -1621.32%. Transocean's return on equity of -6.63% beat Leopard Energy's return on equity of -1169.22%.

Transocean has a consensus price target of $4.21, signalling upside risk potential of 69.11%. On the other hand Leopard Energy has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Transocean has higher upside potential than Leopard Energy, analysts believe Transocean is more attractive than Leopard Energy.

Transocean has a beta of 2.519, which suggesting that the stock is 151.943% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Leopard Energy has a beta of -0.395, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 139.465%.

Transocean has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Leopard Energy offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Transocean pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Leopard Energy pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Transocean quarterly revenues are $906M, which are larger than Leopard Energy quarterly revenues of $1.5K. Transocean's net income of -$79M is lower than Leopard Energy's net income of -$24.3K. Notably, Transocean's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Leopard Energy's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Transocean is 0.63x versus 24.35x for Leopard Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Exxon Mobil has a net margin of -8.72% compared to Transocean's net margin of 9.52%. Transocean's return on equity of -6.63% beat Exxon Mobil's return on equity of 12.7%.

Transocean has a consensus price target of $4.21, signalling upside risk potential of 69.11%. On the other hand Exxon Mobil has an analysts' consensus of $123.65 which suggests that it could grow by 20.87%. Given that Transocean has higher upside potential than Exxon Mobil, analysts believe Transocean is more attractive than Exxon Mobil.

Transocean has a beta of 2.519, which suggesting that the stock is 151.943% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Exxon Mobil has a beta of 0.509, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 49.105%.

Transocean has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Exxon Mobil offers a yield of 3.83% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.99 per share. Transocean pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Exxon Mobil pays out 49.6% of its earnings as a dividend. Exxon Mobil's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Transocean quarterly revenues are $906M, which are smaller than Exxon Mobil quarterly revenues of $81.1B. Transocean's net income of -$79M is lower than Exxon Mobil's net income of $7.7B. Notably, Transocean's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Exxon Mobil's PE ratio is 13.57x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Transocean is 0.63x versus 1.32x for Exxon Mobil. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.