Financhill
Buy
58

RF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Last price:
$21.42
Seasonality move :
-0.73%
Day range:
$21.28 - $21.55
52-week range:
$17.72 - $27.96
Dividend yield:
4.62%
P/E ratio:
10.31x
P/S ratio:
2.76x
P/B ratio:
1.15x
Volume:
11.9M
Avg. volume:
7.2M
1-year change:
12.84%
Market cap:
$19.3B
Revenue:
$7.1B
EPS (TTM):
$2.08

Price Performance History

Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Competitors

Company Revenue Forecast Earnings Forecast Revenue Growth Forecast Earnings Growth Forecast Analyst Price Target Median
RF
Regions Financial
$1.9B $0.57 7.44% 6.89% $24.05
BAC
Bank of America
$27B $0.94 5.57% 7.87% $48.96
HBAN
Huntington Bancshares
$2B $0.37 9.43% 18.02% $17.65
KEY
KeyCorp
$1.9B $0.38 22.61% 39.5% $18.90
TFC
Truist Financial
$5.2B $1.00 2.54% 50.72% $45.12
WFC
Wells Fargo &
$21.2B $1.50 0.69% 4.84% $78.25
Company Price Analyst Target Market Cap P/E Ratio Dividend per Share Dividend Yield Price / LTM Sales
RF
Regions Financial
$21.44 $24.05 $19.3B 10.31x $0.25 4.62% 2.76x
BAC
Bank of America
$44.13 $48.96 $332.4B 13.13x $0.26 2.31% 3.36x
HBAN
Huntington Bancshares
$15.63 $17.65 $22.8B 11.93x $0.16 3.97% 3.06x
KEY
KeyCorp
$15.86 $18.90 $17.4B 1,730.50x $0.21 5.17% 3.40x
TFC
Truist Financial
$39.50 $45.12 $51.7B 11.65x $0.52 5.27% 3.94x
WFC
Wells Fargo &
$74.78 $78.25 $243.3B 13.43x $0.40 2.14% 3.11x
Company Total Debt / Total Capital Beta Debt to Equity Quick Ratio
RF
Regions Financial
24.52% 1.742 28.3% 69.45x
BAC
Bank of America
53.9% 1.570 102.87% 1.80x
HBAN
Huntington Bancshares
47.69% 1.470 77.92% 39.62x
KEY
KeyCorp
43.65% 1.480 72.58% 9.73x
TFC
Truist Financial
46.31% 1.749 93.25% 2.54x
WFC
Wells Fargo &
51.02% 1.365 74.09% 2.89x
Company Gross Profit Operating Income Return on Invested Capital Return on Common Equity EBIT Margin Free Cash Flow
RF
Regions Financial
-- -- 8.44% 11.26% 64.57% $1.1B
BAC
Bank of America
-- -- 4.42% 9.44% 101.36% -$2.2B
HBAN
Huntington Bancshares
-- -- 5.6% 10.26% 89.38% $459M
KEY
KeyCorp
-- -- 0.07% 0.15% 86.37% -$150M
TFC
Truist Financial
-- -- 4.09% 7.7% 81.98% $746M
WFC
Wells Fargo &
-- -- 5.31% 10.99% 73.47% -$11B

Regions Financial vs. Competitors

  • Which has Higher Returns RF or BAC?

    Bank of America has a net margin of 27.47% compared to Regions Financial's net margin of 27.03%. Regions Financial's return on equity of 11.26% beat Bank of America's return on equity of 9.44%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    RF
    Regions Financial
    -- $0.51 $24.6B
    BAC
    Bank of America
    -- $0.90 $641.2B
  • What do Analysts Say About RF or BAC?

    Regions Financial has a consensus price target of $24.05, signalling upside risk potential of 12.15%. On the other hand Bank of America has an analysts' consensus of $48.96 which suggests that it could grow by 10.94%. Given that Regions Financial has higher upside potential than Bank of America, analysts believe Regions Financial is more attractive than Bank of America.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    RF
    Regions Financial
    7 13 0
    BAC
    Bank of America
    15 3 0
  • Is RF or BAC More Risky?

    Regions Financial has a beta of 0.968, which suggesting that the stock is 3.226% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Bank of America has a beta of 1.272, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 27.153%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock RF or BAC?

    Regions Financial has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.62%. Bank of America offers a yield of 2.31% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.26 per share. Regions Financial pays 52.51% of its earnings as a dividend. Bank of America pays out 35.03% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios RF or BAC?

    Regions Financial quarterly revenues are $1.8B, which are smaller than Bank of America quarterly revenues of $27.4B. Regions Financial's net income of $490M is lower than Bank of America's net income of $7.4B. Notably, Regions Financial's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.31x while Bank of America's PE ratio is 13.13x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Regions Financial is 2.76x versus 3.36x for Bank of America. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    RF
    Regions Financial
    2.76x 10.31x $1.8B $490M
    BAC
    Bank of America
    3.36x 13.13x $27.4B $7.4B
  • Which has Higher Returns RF or HBAN?

    Huntington Bancshares has a net margin of 27.47% compared to Regions Financial's net margin of 27.45%. Regions Financial's return on equity of 11.26% beat Huntington Bancshares's return on equity of 10.26%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    RF
    Regions Financial
    -- $0.51 $24.6B
    HBAN
    Huntington Bancshares
    -- $0.34 $39.1B
  • What do Analysts Say About RF or HBAN?

    Regions Financial has a consensus price target of $24.05, signalling upside risk potential of 12.15%. On the other hand Huntington Bancshares has an analysts' consensus of $17.65 which suggests that it could grow by 12.89%. Given that Huntington Bancshares has higher upside potential than Regions Financial, analysts believe Huntington Bancshares is more attractive than Regions Financial.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    RF
    Regions Financial
    7 13 0
    HBAN
    Huntington Bancshares
    12 5 0
  • Is RF or HBAN More Risky?

    Regions Financial has a beta of 0.968, which suggesting that the stock is 3.226% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Huntington Bancshares has a beta of 0.892, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 10.82%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock RF or HBAN?

    Regions Financial has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.62%. Huntington Bancshares offers a yield of 3.97% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share. Regions Financial pays 52.51% of its earnings as a dividend. Huntington Bancshares pays out 53.92% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios RF or HBAN?

    Regions Financial quarterly revenues are $1.8B, which are smaller than Huntington Bancshares quarterly revenues of $1.9B. Regions Financial's net income of $490M is lower than Huntington Bancshares's net income of $527M. Notably, Regions Financial's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.31x while Huntington Bancshares's PE ratio is 11.93x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Regions Financial is 2.76x versus 3.06x for Huntington Bancshares. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    RF
    Regions Financial
    2.76x 10.31x $1.8B $490M
    HBAN
    Huntington Bancshares
    3.06x 11.93x $1.9B $527M
  • Which has Higher Returns RF or KEY?

    KeyCorp has a net margin of 27.47% compared to Regions Financial's net margin of 23.49%. Regions Financial's return on equity of 11.26% beat KeyCorp's return on equity of 0.15%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    RF
    Regions Financial
    -- $0.51 $24.6B
    KEY
    KeyCorp
    -- $0.33 $33.7B
  • What do Analysts Say About RF or KEY?

    Regions Financial has a consensus price target of $24.05, signalling upside risk potential of 12.15%. On the other hand KeyCorp has an analysts' consensus of $18.90 which suggests that it could grow by 19.17%. Given that KeyCorp has higher upside potential than Regions Financial, analysts believe KeyCorp is more attractive than Regions Financial.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    RF
    Regions Financial
    7 13 0
    KEY
    KeyCorp
    8 11 0
  • Is RF or KEY More Risky?

    Regions Financial has a beta of 0.968, which suggesting that the stock is 3.226% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison KeyCorp has a beta of 1.081, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.137%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock RF or KEY?

    Regions Financial has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.62%. KeyCorp offers a yield of 5.17% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.21 per share. Regions Financial pays 52.51% of its earnings as a dividend. KeyCorp pays out -575.78% of its earnings as a dividend. Regions Financial's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios RF or KEY?

    Regions Financial quarterly revenues are $1.8B, which are larger than KeyCorp quarterly revenues of $1.7B. Regions Financial's net income of $490M is higher than KeyCorp's net income of $405M. Notably, Regions Financial's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.31x while KeyCorp's PE ratio is 1,730.50x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Regions Financial is 2.76x versus 3.40x for KeyCorp. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    RF
    Regions Financial
    2.76x 10.31x $1.8B $490M
    KEY
    KeyCorp
    3.40x 1,730.50x $1.7B $405M
  • Which has Higher Returns RF or TFC?

    Truist Financial has a net margin of 27.47% compared to Regions Financial's net margin of 25.74%. Regions Financial's return on equity of 11.26% beat Truist Financial's return on equity of 7.7%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    RF
    Regions Financial
    -- $0.51 $24.6B
    TFC
    Truist Financial
    -- $0.87 $120.4B
  • What do Analysts Say About RF or TFC?

    Regions Financial has a consensus price target of $24.05, signalling upside risk potential of 12.15%. On the other hand Truist Financial has an analysts' consensus of $45.12 which suggests that it could grow by 14.22%. Given that Truist Financial has higher upside potential than Regions Financial, analysts believe Truist Financial is more attractive than Regions Financial.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    RF
    Regions Financial
    7 13 0
    TFC
    Truist Financial
    7 13 0
  • Is RF or TFC More Risky?

    Regions Financial has a beta of 0.968, which suggesting that the stock is 3.226% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Truist Financial has a beta of 0.836, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 16.444%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock RF or TFC?

    Regions Financial has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.62%. Truist Financial offers a yield of 5.27% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.52 per share. Regions Financial pays 52.51% of its earnings as a dividend. Truist Financial pays out 65.07% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios RF or TFC?

    Regions Financial quarterly revenues are $1.8B, which are smaller than Truist Financial quarterly revenues of $4.9B. Regions Financial's net income of $490M is lower than Truist Financial's net income of $1.3B. Notably, Regions Financial's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.31x while Truist Financial's PE ratio is 11.65x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Regions Financial is 2.76x versus 3.94x for Truist Financial. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    RF
    Regions Financial
    2.76x 10.31x $1.8B $490M
    TFC
    Truist Financial
    3.94x 11.65x $4.9B $1.3B
  • Which has Higher Returns RF or WFC?

    Wells Fargo & has a net margin of 27.47% compared to Regions Financial's net margin of 24.29%. Regions Financial's return on equity of 11.26% beat Wells Fargo &'s return on equity of 10.99%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    RF
    Regions Financial
    -- $0.51 $24.6B
    WFC
    Wells Fargo &
    -- $1.39 $371.5B
  • What do Analysts Say About RF or WFC?

    Regions Financial has a consensus price target of $24.05, signalling upside risk potential of 12.15%. On the other hand Wells Fargo & has an analysts' consensus of $78.25 which suggests that it could grow by 4.64%. Given that Regions Financial has higher upside potential than Wells Fargo &, analysts believe Regions Financial is more attractive than Wells Fargo &.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    RF
    Regions Financial
    7 13 0
    WFC
    Wells Fargo &
    10 7 0
  • Is RF or WFC More Risky?

    Regions Financial has a beta of 0.968, which suggesting that the stock is 3.226% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Wells Fargo & has a beta of 1.134, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 13.357%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock RF or WFC?

    Regions Financial has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.62%. Wells Fargo & offers a yield of 2.14% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share. Regions Financial pays 52.51% of its earnings as a dividend. Wells Fargo & pays out 31.6% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios RF or WFC?

    Regions Financial quarterly revenues are $1.8B, which are smaller than Wells Fargo & quarterly revenues of $20.1B. Regions Financial's net income of $490M is lower than Wells Fargo &'s net income of $4.9B. Notably, Regions Financial's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.31x while Wells Fargo &'s PE ratio is 13.43x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Regions Financial is 2.76x versus 3.11x for Wells Fargo &. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    RF
    Regions Financial
    2.76x 10.31x $1.8B $490M
    WFC
    Wells Fargo &
    3.11x 13.43x $20.1B $4.9B

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Popular

Best AI Index Fund to Buy
Best AI Index Fund to Buy

Over the last two years, companies with a focus on…

Where Will Salesforce Stock Be in 5 Years?
Where Will Salesforce Stock Be in 5 Years?

Salesforce (NYSE: CRM) just turned in a quarter that, on…

2 Ultra Safe Dividend Stocks to Buy Now
2 Ultra Safe Dividend Stocks to Buy Now

Historically, blue-chip dividend stocks have been good choices for periods…

Stock Ideas

Buy
67
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.4T
P/E Ratio: 39x

Buy
65
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.3T
P/E Ratio: 46x

Sell
40
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3T
P/E Ratio: 33x

Alerts

Sell
31
REGN alert for May 31

Regeneron Pharmaceuticals [REGN] is down 19.04% over the past day.

Buy
55
RGC alert for May 31

Regencell Bioscience Holdings [RGC] is up 16.13% over the past day.

Sell
42
AMBA alert for May 31

Ambarella [AMBA] is down 15.13% over the past day.

THE #1 STOCK ANALYSIS TOOL
TO MAKE SMARTER BUY AND SELL DECISIONS

Show me the best stock