QRVO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Focus Universal has a net margin of 3.61% compared to Qorvo's net margin of -657.74%. Qorvo's return on equity of 1.61% beat Focus Universal's return on equity of -111.52%.

Qorvo has a consensus price target of $81.72, signalling downside risk potential of -7.43%. On the other hand Focus Universal has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Qorvo has higher upside potential than Focus Universal, analysts believe Qorvo is more attractive than Focus Universal.

Qorvo has a beta of 1.388, which suggesting that the stock is 38.836% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Focus Universal has a beta of 0.145, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 85.463%.

Qorvo has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Focus Universal offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Qorvo pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Focus Universal pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Qorvo quarterly revenues are $869.5M, which are larger than Focus Universal quarterly revenues of $190.3K. Qorvo's net income of $31.4M is higher than Focus Universal's net income of -$1.3M. Notably, Qorvo's price-to-earnings ratio is 151.09x while Focus Universal's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Qorvo is 2.26x versus 67.80x for Focus Universal. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Mesa Laboratories has a net margin of 3.61% compared to Qorvo's net margin of -11.45%. Qorvo's return on equity of 1.61% beat Mesa Laboratories's return on equity of -1.28%.

Qorvo has a consensus price target of $81.72, signalling downside risk potential of -7.43%. On the other hand Mesa Laboratories has an analysts' consensus of $121.67 which suggests that it could grow by 20.91%. Given that Mesa Laboratories has higher upside potential than Qorvo, analysts believe Mesa Laboratories is more attractive than Qorvo.

Qorvo has a beta of 1.388, which suggesting that the stock is 38.836% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Mesa Laboratories has a beta of 0.863, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 13.682%.

Qorvo has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Mesa Laboratories offers a yield of 0.64% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share. Qorvo pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Mesa Laboratories pays out -175.68% of its earnings as a dividend.

Qorvo quarterly revenues are $869.5M, which are larger than Mesa Laboratories quarterly revenues of $62.1M. Qorvo's net income of $31.4M is higher than Mesa Laboratories's net income of -$7.1M. Notably, Qorvo's price-to-earnings ratio is 151.09x while Mesa Laboratories's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Qorvo is 2.26x versus 2.27x for Mesa Laboratories. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

NVIDIA has a net margin of 3.61% compared to Qorvo's net margin of 42.61%. Qorvo's return on equity of 1.61% beat NVIDIA's return on equity of 114.12%.

Qorvo has a consensus price target of $81.72, signalling downside risk potential of -7.43%. On the other hand NVIDIA has an analysts' consensus of $173.92 which suggests that it could grow by 10.6%. Given that NVIDIA has higher upside potential than Qorvo, analysts believe NVIDIA is more attractive than Qorvo.

Qorvo has a beta of 1.388, which suggesting that the stock is 38.836% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NVIDIA has a beta of 2.130, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 113.014%.

Qorvo has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. NVIDIA offers a yield of 0.03% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. Qorvo pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. NVIDIA pays out 1.14% of its earnings as a dividend. NVIDIA's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Qorvo quarterly revenues are $869.5M, which are smaller than NVIDIA quarterly revenues of $44.1B. Qorvo's net income of $31.4M is lower than NVIDIA's net income of $18.8B. Notably, Qorvo's price-to-earnings ratio is 151.09x while NVIDIA's PE ratio is 50.73x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Qorvo is 2.26x versus 26.19x for NVIDIA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Sono-Tek has a net margin of 3.61% compared to Qorvo's net margin of 6.4%. Qorvo's return on equity of 1.61% beat Sono-Tek's return on equity of 7.48%.

Qorvo has a consensus price target of $81.72, signalling downside risk potential of -7.43%. On the other hand Sono-Tek has an analysts' consensus of $7.75 which suggests that it could grow by 110.88%. Given that Sono-Tek has higher upside potential than Qorvo, analysts believe Sono-Tek is more attractive than Qorvo.

Qorvo has a beta of 1.388, which suggesting that the stock is 38.836% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sono-Tek has a beta of -0.063, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 106.254%.

Qorvo has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Sono-Tek offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Qorvo pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Sono-Tek pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Qorvo quarterly revenues are $869.5M, which are larger than Sono-Tek quarterly revenues of $5.1M. Qorvo's net income of $31.4M is higher than Sono-Tek's net income of $327.7K. Notably, Qorvo's price-to-earnings ratio is 151.09x while Sono-Tek's PE ratio is 45.94x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Qorvo is 2.26x versus 2.83x for Sono-Tek. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.