PPL Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Evergy has a net margin of 10.36% compared to PPL's net margin of 25.7%. PPL's return on equity of 5.87% beat Evergy's return on equity of 8.72%.

PPL has a consensus price target of $35.13, signalling upside risk potential of 7.76%. On the other hand Evergy has an analysts' consensus of $64.62 which suggests that it could grow by 4.64%. Given that PPL has higher upside potential than Evergy, analysts believe PPL is more attractive than Evergy.

PPL has a beta of 0.827, which suggesting that the stock is 17.265% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Evergy has a beta of 0.641, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 35.918%.

PPL has a quarterly dividend of $0.26 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.16%. Evergy offers a yield of 4.2% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.67 per share. PPL pays 95.14% of its earnings as a dividend. Evergy pays out 77.89% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

PPL quarterly revenues are $2.1B, which are larger than Evergy quarterly revenues of $1.8B. PPL's net income of $214M is lower than Evergy's net income of $465.6M. Notably, PPL's price-to-earnings ratio is 29.11x while Evergy's PE ratio is 16.69x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for PPL is 2.91x versus 2.46x for Evergy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Idacorp has a net margin of 10.36% compared to PPL's net margin of 21.5%. PPL's return on equity of 5.87% beat Idacorp's return on equity of 9.27%.

PPL has a consensus price target of $35.13, signalling upside risk potential of 7.76%. On the other hand Idacorp has an analysts' consensus of $117.25 which suggests that it could grow by 6.61%. Given that PPL has higher upside potential than Idacorp, analysts believe PPL is more attractive than Idacorp.

PPL has a beta of 0.827, which suggesting that the stock is 17.265% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Idacorp has a beta of 0.638, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 36.184%.

PPL has a quarterly dividend of $0.26 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.16%. Idacorp offers a yield of 3.03% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.86 per share. PPL pays 95.14% of its earnings as a dividend. Idacorp pays out 62.61% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

PPL quarterly revenues are $2.1B, which are larger than Idacorp quarterly revenues of $528.5M. PPL's net income of $214M is higher than Idacorp's net income of $113.6M. Notably, PPL's price-to-earnings ratio is 29.11x while Idacorp's PE ratio is 20.49x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for PPL is 2.91x versus 3.11x for Idacorp. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Pinnacle West Capital has a net margin of 10.36% compared to PPL's net margin of 22.33%. PPL's return on equity of 5.87% beat Pinnacle West Capital's return on equity of 9.58%.

PPL has a consensus price target of $35.13, signalling upside risk potential of 7.76%. On the other hand Pinnacle West Capital has an analysts' consensus of $93.53 which suggests that it could grow by 9.26%. Given that Pinnacle West Capital has higher upside potential than PPL, analysts believe Pinnacle West Capital is more attractive than PPL.

PPL has a beta of 0.827, which suggesting that the stock is 17.265% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Pinnacle West Capital has a beta of 0.544, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 45.624%.

PPL has a quarterly dividend of $0.26 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.16%. Pinnacle West Capital offers a yield of 4.13% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.90 per share. PPL pays 95.14% of its earnings as a dividend. Pinnacle West Capital pays out 77.06% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

PPL quarterly revenues are $2.1B, which are larger than Pinnacle West Capital quarterly revenues of $1.8B. PPL's net income of $214M is lower than Pinnacle West Capital's net income of $395M. Notably, PPL's price-to-earnings ratio is 29.11x while Pinnacle West Capital's PE ratio is 16.21x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for PPL is 2.91x versus 1.97x for Pinnacle West Capital. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Xcel Energy has a net margin of 10.36% compared to PPL's net margin of 18.72%. PPL's return on equity of 5.87% beat Xcel Energy's return on equity of 10.44%.

PPL has a consensus price target of $35.13, signalling upside risk potential of 7.76%. On the other hand Xcel Energy has an analysts' consensus of $72.39 which suggests that it could grow by 6.12%. Given that PPL has higher upside potential than Xcel Energy, analysts believe PPL is more attractive than Xcel Energy.

PPL has a beta of 0.827, which suggesting that the stock is 17.265% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Xcel Energy has a beta of 0.410, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 58.995%.

PPL has a quarterly dividend of $0.26 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.16%. Xcel Energy offers a yield of 3.17% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.55 per share. PPL pays 95.14% of its earnings as a dividend. Xcel Energy pays out 61.66% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

PPL quarterly revenues are $2.1B, which are smaller than Xcel Energy quarterly revenues of $3.6B. PPL's net income of $214M is lower than Xcel Energy's net income of $682M. Notably, PPL's price-to-earnings ratio is 29.11x while Xcel Energy's PE ratio is 20.24x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for PPL is 2.91x versus 2.77x for Xcel Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.