OMC Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Lendway has a net margin of 7.8% compared to Omnicom Group's net margin of 3.61%. Omnicom Group's return on equity of 29.27% beat Lendway's return on equity of -29.67%.

Omnicom Group has a consensus price target of $102.01, signalling upside risk potential of 46.82%. On the other hand Lendway has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Omnicom Group has higher upside potential than Lendway, analysts believe Omnicom Group is more attractive than Lendway.

Omnicom Group has a beta of 0.934, which suggesting that the stock is 6.618% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lendway has a beta of 2.529, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 152.946%.

Omnicom Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.70 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.03%. Lendway offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Omnicom Group pays 37.33% of its earnings as a dividend. Lendway pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Omnicom Group's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Omnicom Group quarterly revenues are $3.7B, which are larger than Lendway quarterly revenues of $12.4M. Omnicom Group's net income of $287.7M is higher than Lendway's net income of $449K. Notably, Omnicom Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.50x while Lendway's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Omnicom Group is 0.87x versus 0.20x for Lendway. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Magnite has a net margin of 7.8% compared to Omnicom Group's net margin of -6.19%. Omnicom Group's return on equity of 29.27% beat Magnite's return on equity of 4.24%.

Omnicom Group has a consensus price target of $102.01, signalling upside risk potential of 46.82%. On the other hand Magnite has an analysts' consensus of $19.88 which suggests that it could grow by 16.28%. Given that Omnicom Group has higher upside potential than Magnite, analysts believe Omnicom Group is more attractive than Magnite.

Omnicom Group has a beta of 0.934, which suggesting that the stock is 6.618% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Magnite has a beta of 2.839, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 183.893%.

Omnicom Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.70 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.03%. Magnite offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Omnicom Group pays 37.33% of its earnings as a dividend. Magnite pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Omnicom Group's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Omnicom Group quarterly revenues are $3.7B, which are larger than Magnite quarterly revenues of $155.8M. Omnicom Group's net income of $287.7M is higher than Magnite's net income of -$9.6M. Notably, Omnicom Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.50x while Magnite's PE ratio is 85.50x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Omnicom Group is 0.87x versus 3.78x for Magnite. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

WPP PLC has a net margin of 7.8% compared to Omnicom Group's net margin of --. Omnicom Group's return on equity of 29.27% beat WPP PLC's return on equity of 14.21%.

Omnicom Group has a consensus price target of $102.01, signalling upside risk potential of 46.82%. On the other hand WPP PLC has an analysts' consensus of $40.50 which suggests that it could grow by 6.52%. Given that Omnicom Group has higher upside potential than WPP PLC, analysts believe Omnicom Group is more attractive than WPP PLC.

Omnicom Group has a beta of 0.934, which suggesting that the stock is 6.618% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison WPP PLC has a beta of 1.048, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 4.842%.

Omnicom Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.70 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.03%. WPP PLC offers a yield of 6.61% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.54 per share. Omnicom Group pays 37.33% of its earnings as a dividend. WPP PLC pays out 78.41% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Omnicom Group quarterly revenues are $3.7B, which are larger than WPP PLC quarterly revenues of --. Omnicom Group's net income of $287.7M is higher than WPP PLC's net income of --. Notably, Omnicom Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.50x while WPP PLC's PE ratio is 12.09x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Omnicom Group is 0.87x versus 0.45x for WPP PLC. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Ziff Davis has a net margin of 7.8% compared to Omnicom Group's net margin of 7.38%. Omnicom Group's return on equity of 29.27% beat Ziff Davis's return on equity of 4.19%.

Omnicom Group has a consensus price target of $102.01, signalling upside risk potential of 46.82%. On the other hand Ziff Davis has an analysts' consensus of $41.33 which suggests that it could grow by 27.73%. Given that Omnicom Group has higher upside potential than Ziff Davis, analysts believe Omnicom Group is more attractive than Ziff Davis.

Omnicom Group has a beta of 0.934, which suggesting that the stock is 6.618% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ziff Davis has a beta of 1.605, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 60.531%.

Omnicom Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.70 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.03%. Ziff Davis offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Omnicom Group pays 37.33% of its earnings as a dividend. Ziff Davis pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Omnicom Group's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Omnicom Group quarterly revenues are $3.7B, which are larger than Ziff Davis quarterly revenues of $328.6M. Omnicom Group's net income of $287.7M is higher than Ziff Davis's net income of $24.2M. Notably, Omnicom Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.50x while Ziff Davis's PE ratio is 19.61x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Omnicom Group is 0.87x versus 1.04x for Ziff Davis. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.