WPP Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

The Interpublic Group of Companies has a net margin of -- compared to WPP PLC's net margin of -3.68%. WPP PLC's return on equity of 14.21% beat The Interpublic Group of Companies's return on equity of 12.8%.

WPP PLC has a consensus price target of $40.50, signalling upside risk potential of 15.55%. On the other hand The Interpublic Group of Companies has an analysts' consensus of $34.27 which suggests that it could grow by 46.34%. Given that The Interpublic Group of Companies has higher upside potential than WPP PLC, analysts believe The Interpublic Group of Companies is more attractive than WPP PLC.

WPP PLC has a beta of 1.048, which suggesting that the stock is 4.842% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Interpublic Group of Companies has a beta of 1.057, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 5.737%.

WPP PLC has a quarterly dividend of $1.66 per share corresponding to a yield of 7.5%. The Interpublic Group of Companies offers a yield of 5.64% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.33 per share. WPP PLC pays 78.41% of its earnings as a dividend. The Interpublic Group of Companies pays out 72.01% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

WPP PLC quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than The Interpublic Group of Companies quarterly revenues of $2.3B. WPP PLC's net income of -- is lower than The Interpublic Group of Companies's net income of -$85.4M. Notably, WPP PLC's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.15x while The Interpublic Group of Companies's PE ratio is 17.88x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for WPP PLC is 0.41x versus 0.84x for The Interpublic Group of Companies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lendway has a net margin of -- compared to WPP PLC's net margin of 3.61%. WPP PLC's return on equity of 14.21% beat Lendway's return on equity of -29.67%.

WPP PLC has a consensus price target of $40.50, signalling upside risk potential of 15.55%. On the other hand Lendway has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that WPP PLC has higher upside potential than Lendway, analysts believe WPP PLC is more attractive than Lendway.

WPP PLC has a beta of 1.048, which suggesting that the stock is 4.842% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lendway has a beta of 2.529, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 152.946%.

WPP PLC has a quarterly dividend of $1.66 per share corresponding to a yield of 7.5%. Lendway offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. WPP PLC pays 78.41% of its earnings as a dividend. Lendway pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. WPP PLC's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

WPP PLC quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Lendway quarterly revenues of $12.4M. WPP PLC's net income of -- is lower than Lendway's net income of $449K. Notably, WPP PLC's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.15x while Lendway's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for WPP PLC is 0.41x versus 0.21x for Lendway. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Omnicom Group has a net margin of -- compared to WPP PLC's net margin of 7.8%. WPP PLC's return on equity of 14.21% beat Omnicom Group's return on equity of 29.27%.

WPP PLC has a consensus price target of $40.50, signalling upside risk potential of 15.55%. On the other hand Omnicom Group has an analysts' consensus of $102.01 which suggests that it could grow by 45.15%. Given that Omnicom Group has higher upside potential than WPP PLC, analysts believe Omnicom Group is more attractive than WPP PLC.

WPP PLC has a beta of 1.048, which suggesting that the stock is 4.842% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Omnicom Group has a beta of 0.934, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 6.618%.

WPP PLC has a quarterly dividend of $1.66 per share corresponding to a yield of 7.5%. Omnicom Group offers a yield of 3.98% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.70 per share. WPP PLC pays 78.41% of its earnings as a dividend. Omnicom Group pays out 37.33% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

WPP PLC quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Omnicom Group quarterly revenues of $3.7B. WPP PLC's net income of -- is lower than Omnicom Group's net income of $287.7M. Notably, WPP PLC's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.15x while Omnicom Group's PE ratio is 9.61x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for WPP PLC is 0.41x versus 0.88x for Omnicom Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Ziff Davis has a net margin of -- compared to WPP PLC's net margin of 7.38%. WPP PLC's return on equity of 14.21% beat Ziff Davis's return on equity of 4.19%.

WPP PLC has a consensus price target of $40.50, signalling upside risk potential of 15.55%. On the other hand Ziff Davis has an analysts' consensus of $41.33 which suggests that it could grow by 31.51%. Given that Ziff Davis has higher upside potential than WPP PLC, analysts believe Ziff Davis is more attractive than WPP PLC.

WPP PLC has a beta of 1.048, which suggesting that the stock is 4.842% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ziff Davis has a beta of 1.605, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 60.531%.

WPP PLC has a quarterly dividend of $1.66 per share corresponding to a yield of 7.5%. Ziff Davis offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. WPP PLC pays 78.41% of its earnings as a dividend. Ziff Davis pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. WPP PLC's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

WPP PLC quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Ziff Davis quarterly revenues of $328.6M. WPP PLC's net income of -- is lower than Ziff Davis's net income of $24.2M. Notably, WPP PLC's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.15x while Ziff Davis's PE ratio is 19.05x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for WPP PLC is 0.41x versus 1.01x for Ziff Davis. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.