OI Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Hyliion Holdings has a net margin of -1.02% compared to O-I Glass's net margin of -3528.43%. O-I Glass's return on equity of -13.06% beat Hyliion Holdings's return on equity of --.

O-I Glass has a consensus price target of $15.90, signalling upside risk potential of 21.28%. On the other hand Hyliion Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 29.87%. Given that Hyliion Holdings has higher upside potential than O-I Glass, analysts believe Hyliion Holdings is more attractive than O-I Glass.

O-I Glass has a beta of 0.934, which suggesting that the stock is 6.595% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hyliion Holdings has a beta of 2.762, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 176.173%.

O-I Glass has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Hyliion Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. O-I Glass pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Hyliion Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

O-I Glass quarterly revenues are $1.6B, which are larger than Hyliion Holdings quarterly revenues of $489K. O-I Glass's net income of -$16M is higher than Hyliion Holdings's net income of -$17.3M. Notably, O-I Glass's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Hyliion Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for O-I Glass is 0.31x versus 124.74x for Hyliion Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Luminar Technologies has a net margin of -1.02% compared to O-I Glass's net margin of -427.25%. O-I Glass's return on equity of -13.06% beat Luminar Technologies's return on equity of --.

O-I Glass has a consensus price target of $15.90, signalling upside risk potential of 21.28%. On the other hand Luminar Technologies has an analysts' consensus of $25.75 which suggests that it could grow by 617.27%. Given that Luminar Technologies has higher upside potential than O-I Glass, analysts believe Luminar Technologies is more attractive than O-I Glass.

O-I Glass has a beta of 0.934, which suggesting that the stock is 6.595% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Luminar Technologies has a beta of 2.056, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 105.58%.

O-I Glass has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Luminar Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. O-I Glass pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Luminar Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

O-I Glass quarterly revenues are $1.6B, which are larger than Luminar Technologies quarterly revenues of $18.9M. O-I Glass's net income of -$16M is higher than Luminar Technologies's net income of -$80.7M. Notably, O-I Glass's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Luminar Technologies's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for O-I Glass is 0.31x versus 1.72x for Luminar Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Northann has a net margin of -1.02% compared to O-I Glass's net margin of --. O-I Glass's return on equity of -13.06% beat Northann's return on equity of --.

O-I Glass has a consensus price target of $15.90, signalling upside risk potential of 21.28%. On the other hand Northann has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that O-I Glass has higher upside potential than Northann, analysts believe O-I Glass is more attractive than Northann.

O-I Glass has a beta of 0.934, which suggesting that the stock is 6.595% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Northann has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

O-I Glass has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Northann offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. O-I Glass pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Northann pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

O-I Glass quarterly revenues are $1.6B, which are larger than Northann quarterly revenues of --. O-I Glass's net income of -$16M is higher than Northann's net income of --. Notably, O-I Glass's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Northann's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for O-I Glass is 0.31x versus 1.68x for Northann. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Rivian Automotive has a net margin of -1.02% compared to O-I Glass's net margin of -43.95%. O-I Glass's return on equity of -13.06% beat Rivian Automotive's return on equity of -57.26%.

O-I Glass has a consensus price target of $15.90, signalling upside risk potential of 21.28%. On the other hand Rivian Automotive has an analysts' consensus of $14.73 which suggests that it could grow by 1.35%. Given that O-I Glass has higher upside potential than Rivian Automotive, analysts believe O-I Glass is more attractive than Rivian Automotive.

O-I Glass has a beta of 0.934, which suggesting that the stock is 6.595% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Rivian Automotive has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

O-I Glass has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Rivian Automotive offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. O-I Glass pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Rivian Automotive pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

O-I Glass quarterly revenues are $1.6B, which are larger than Rivian Automotive quarterly revenues of $1.2B. O-I Glass's net income of -$16M is higher than Rivian Automotive's net income of -$545M. Notably, O-I Glass's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Rivian Automotive's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for O-I Glass is 0.31x versus 3.05x for Rivian Automotive. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.