KIM Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

CBL & Associates Properties has a net margin of 24.75% compared to Kimco Realty's net margin of 6.2%. Kimco Realty's return on equity of 5.14% beat CBL & Associates Properties's return on equity of 22.44%.

Kimco Realty has a consensus price target of $23.89, signalling upside risk potential of 16.66%. On the other hand CBL & Associates Properties has an analysts' consensus of $36.00 which suggests that it could grow by 47.97%. Given that CBL & Associates Properties has higher upside potential than Kimco Realty, analysts believe CBL & Associates Properties is more attractive than Kimco Realty.

Kimco Realty has a beta of 1.264, which suggesting that the stock is 26.414% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CBL & Associates Properties has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Kimco Realty has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.79%. CBL & Associates Properties offers a yield of 6.58% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.20 per share. Kimco Realty pays 166.97% of its earnings as a dividend. CBL & Associates Properties pays out 85.39% of its earnings as a dividend. CBL & Associates Properties's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Kimco Realty's is not.

Kimco Realty quarterly revenues are $536.6M, which are larger than CBL & Associates Properties quarterly revenues of $141.8M. Kimco Realty's net income of $132.8M is higher than CBL & Associates Properties's net income of $8.8M. Notably, Kimco Realty's price-to-earnings ratio is 26.60x while CBL & Associates Properties's PE ratio is 11.32x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kimco Realty is 6.67x versus 1.42x for CBL & Associates Properties. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Global Medical REIT has a net margin of 24.75% compared to Kimco Realty's net margin of 10.29%. Kimco Realty's return on equity of 5.14% beat Global Medical REIT's return on equity of 1.4%.

Kimco Realty has a consensus price target of $23.89, signalling upside risk potential of 16.66%. On the other hand Global Medical REIT has an analysts' consensus of $9.66 which suggests that it could grow by 55.75%. Given that Global Medical REIT has higher upside potential than Kimco Realty, analysts believe Global Medical REIT is more attractive than Kimco Realty.

Kimco Realty has a beta of 1.264, which suggesting that the stock is 26.414% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Global Medical REIT has a beta of 1.229, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 22.918%.

Kimco Realty has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.79%. Global Medical REIT offers a yield of 13.55% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.21 per share. Kimco Realty pays 166.97% of its earnings as a dividend. Global Medical REIT pays out 990.35% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Kimco Realty quarterly revenues are $536.6M, which are larger than Global Medical REIT quarterly revenues of $34.6M. Kimco Realty's net income of $132.8M is higher than Global Medical REIT's net income of $3.6M. Notably, Kimco Realty's price-to-earnings ratio is 26.60x while Global Medical REIT's PE ratio is 206.67x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kimco Realty is 6.67x versus 2.98x for Global Medical REIT. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Realty Income has a net margin of 24.75% compared to Kimco Realty's net margin of 18.1%. Kimco Realty's return on equity of 5.14% beat Realty Income's return on equity of 2.51%.

Kimco Realty has a consensus price target of $23.89, signalling upside risk potential of 16.66%. On the other hand Realty Income has an analysts' consensus of $61.74 which suggests that it could grow by 11.18%. Given that Kimco Realty has higher upside potential than Realty Income, analysts believe Kimco Realty is more attractive than Realty Income.

Kimco Realty has a beta of 1.264, which suggesting that the stock is 26.414% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Realty Income has a beta of 0.778, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 22.191%.

Kimco Realty has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.79%. Realty Income offers a yield of 5.72% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share. Kimco Realty pays 166.97% of its earnings as a dividend. Realty Income pays out 313.61% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Kimco Realty quarterly revenues are $536.6M, which are smaller than Realty Income quarterly revenues of $1.4B. Kimco Realty's net income of $132.8M is lower than Realty Income's net income of $249.8M. Notably, Kimco Realty's price-to-earnings ratio is 26.60x while Realty Income's PE ratio is 50.48x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kimco Realty is 6.67x versus 9.04x for Realty Income. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Strawberry Fields REIT has a net margin of 24.75% compared to Kimco Realty's net margin of 4.24%. Kimco Realty's return on equity of 5.14% beat Strawberry Fields REIT's return on equity of 7.59%.

Kimco Realty has a consensus price target of $23.89, signalling upside risk potential of 16.66%. On the other hand Strawberry Fields REIT has an analysts' consensus of $13.10 which suggests that it could grow by 32.32%. Given that Strawberry Fields REIT has higher upside potential than Kimco Realty, analysts believe Strawberry Fields REIT is more attractive than Kimco Realty.

Kimco Realty has a beta of 1.264, which suggesting that the stock is 26.414% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Strawberry Fields REIT has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Kimco Realty has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.79%. Strawberry Fields REIT offers a yield of 5.46% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.14 per share. Kimco Realty pays 166.97% of its earnings as a dividend. Strawberry Fields REIT pays out 98.54% of its earnings as a dividend. Strawberry Fields REIT's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Kimco Realty's is not.

Kimco Realty quarterly revenues are $536.6M, which are larger than Strawberry Fields REIT quarterly revenues of $37.3M. Kimco Realty's net income of $132.8M is higher than Strawberry Fields REIT's net income of $1.6M. Notably, Kimco Realty's price-to-earnings ratio is 26.60x while Strawberry Fields REIT's PE ratio is 17.07x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kimco Realty is 6.67x versus 0.67x for Strawberry Fields REIT. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.