STRW Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Global Medical REIT has a net margin of 4.24% compared to Strawberry Fields REIT's net margin of 10.29%. Strawberry Fields REIT's return on equity of 7.59% beat Global Medical REIT's return on equity of 1.4%.

Strawberry Fields REIT has a consensus price target of $13.10, signalling upside risk potential of 34.77%. On the other hand Global Medical REIT has an analysts' consensus of $9.41 which suggests that it could grow by 47.9%. Given that Global Medical REIT has higher upside potential than Strawberry Fields REIT, analysts believe Global Medical REIT is more attractive than Strawberry Fields REIT.

Strawberry Fields REIT has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Global Medical REIT has a beta of 1.229, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 22.918%.

Strawberry Fields REIT has a quarterly dividend of $0.14 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.56%. Global Medical REIT offers a yield of 13.21% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.21 per share. Strawberry Fields REIT pays 98.54% of its earnings as a dividend. Global Medical REIT pays out 990.35% of its earnings as a dividend. Strawberry Fields REIT's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Global Medical REIT's is not.

Strawberry Fields REIT quarterly revenues are $37.3M, which are larger than Global Medical REIT quarterly revenues of $34.6M. Strawberry Fields REIT's net income of $1.6M is lower than Global Medical REIT's net income of $3.6M. Notably, Strawberry Fields REIT's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.76x while Global Medical REIT's PE ratio is 212.00x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Strawberry Fields REIT is 0.66x versus 3.06x for Global Medical REIT. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Getty Realty has a net margin of 4.24% compared to Strawberry Fields REIT's net margin of 28.26%. Strawberry Fields REIT's return on equity of 7.59% beat Getty Realty's return on equity of 7.22%.

Strawberry Fields REIT has a consensus price target of $13.10, signalling upside risk potential of 34.77%. On the other hand Getty Realty has an analysts' consensus of $32.14 which suggests that it could grow by 10.31%. Given that Strawberry Fields REIT has higher upside potential than Getty Realty, analysts believe Strawberry Fields REIT is more attractive than Getty Realty.

Strawberry Fields REIT has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Getty Realty has a beta of 0.830, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 17.011%.

Strawberry Fields REIT has a quarterly dividend of $0.14 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.56%. Getty Realty offers a yield of 6.31% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.47 per share. Strawberry Fields REIT pays 98.54% of its earnings as a dividend. Getty Realty pays out 141.01% of its earnings as a dividend. Strawberry Fields REIT's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Getty Realty's is not.

Strawberry Fields REIT quarterly revenues are $37.3M, which are smaller than Getty Realty quarterly revenues of $52.3M. Strawberry Fields REIT's net income of $1.6M is lower than Getty Realty's net income of $14.8M. Notably, Strawberry Fields REIT's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.76x while Getty Realty's PE ratio is 24.08x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Strawberry Fields REIT is 0.66x versus 7.73x for Getty Realty. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

National Storage Affiliates Trust has a net margin of 4.24% compared to Strawberry Fields REIT's net margin of 6.9%. Strawberry Fields REIT's return on equity of 7.59% beat National Storage Affiliates Trust's return on equity of 3.63%.

Strawberry Fields REIT has a consensus price target of $13.10, signalling upside risk potential of 34.77%. On the other hand National Storage Affiliates Trust has an analysts' consensus of $37.57 which suggests that it could grow by 10.34%. Given that Strawberry Fields REIT has higher upside potential than National Storage Affiliates Trust, analysts believe Strawberry Fields REIT is more attractive than National Storage Affiliates Trust.

Strawberry Fields REIT has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison National Storage Affiliates Trust has a beta of 1.204, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 20.384%.

Strawberry Fields REIT has a quarterly dividend of $0.14 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.56%. National Storage Affiliates Trust offers a yield of 6.64% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.57 per share. Strawberry Fields REIT pays 98.54% of its earnings as a dividend. National Storage Affiliates Trust pays out 172.41% of its earnings as a dividend. Strawberry Fields REIT's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but National Storage Affiliates Trust's is not.

Strawberry Fields REIT quarterly revenues are $37.3M, which are smaller than National Storage Affiliates Trust quarterly revenues of $188.4M. Strawberry Fields REIT's net income of $1.6M is lower than National Storage Affiliates Trust's net income of $13M. Notably, Strawberry Fields REIT's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.76x while National Storage Affiliates Trust's PE ratio is 57.71x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Strawberry Fields REIT is 0.66x versus 3.39x for National Storage Affiliates Trust. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Veris Residential has a net margin of 4.24% compared to Strawberry Fields REIT's net margin of -15.79%. Strawberry Fields REIT's return on equity of 7.59% beat Veris Residential's return on equity of -2.38%.

Strawberry Fields REIT has a consensus price target of $13.10, signalling upside risk potential of 34.77%. On the other hand Veris Residential has an analysts' consensus of $19.04 which suggests that it could grow by 27.2%. Given that Strawberry Fields REIT has higher upside potential than Veris Residential, analysts believe Strawberry Fields REIT is more attractive than Veris Residential.

Strawberry Fields REIT has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Veris Residential has a beta of 1.236, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 23.563%.

Strawberry Fields REIT has a quarterly dividend of $0.14 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.56%. Veris Residential offers a yield of 1.94% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share. Strawberry Fields REIT pays 98.54% of its earnings as a dividend. Veris Residential pays out -104.03% of its earnings as a dividend. Strawberry Fields REIT's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Strawberry Fields REIT quarterly revenues are $37.3M, which are smaller than Veris Residential quarterly revenues of $67.8M. Strawberry Fields REIT's net income of $1.6M is higher than Veris Residential's net income of -$10.7M. Notably, Strawberry Fields REIT's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.76x while Veris Residential's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Strawberry Fields REIT is 0.66x versus 5.61x for Veris Residential. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.