HPQ Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Dell Technologies has a net margin of 3.07% compared to HP's net margin of 4.13%. HP's return on equity of -- beat Dell Technologies's return on equity of --.

HP has a consensus price target of $27.21, signalling upside risk potential of 9.99%. On the other hand Dell Technologies has an analysts' consensus of $135.19 which suggests that it could grow by 19.22%. Given that Dell Technologies has higher upside potential than HP, analysts believe Dell Technologies is more attractive than HP.

HP has a beta of 1.303, which suggesting that the stock is 30.342% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Dell Technologies has a beta of 1.015, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.528%.

HP has a quarterly dividend of $0.29 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.62%. Dell Technologies offers a yield of 1.64% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.53 per share. HP pays 38.74% of its earnings as a dividend. Dell Technologies pays out 27.77% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

HP quarterly revenues are $13.2B, which are smaller than Dell Technologies quarterly revenues of $23.4B. HP's net income of $406M is lower than Dell Technologies's net income of $965M. Notably, HP's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.55x while Dell Technologies's PE ratio is 18.09x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for HP is 0.44x versus 0.84x for Dell Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Hewlett Packard Enterprise has a net margin of 3.07% compared to HP's net margin of -13.77%. HP's return on equity of -- beat Hewlett Packard Enterprise's return on equity of 6.17%.

HP has a consensus price target of $27.21, signalling upside risk potential of 9.99%. On the other hand Hewlett Packard Enterprise has an analysts' consensus of $21.12 which suggests that it could grow by 16.49%. Given that Hewlett Packard Enterprise has higher upside potential than HP, analysts believe Hewlett Packard Enterprise is more attractive than HP.

HP has a beta of 1.303, which suggesting that the stock is 30.342% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hewlett Packard Enterprise has a beta of 1.313, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 31.299%.

HP has a quarterly dividend of $0.29 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.62%. Hewlett Packard Enterprise offers a yield of 2.87% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. HP pays 38.74% of its earnings as a dividend. Hewlett Packard Enterprise pays out 26.21% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

HP quarterly revenues are $13.2B, which are larger than Hewlett Packard Enterprise quarterly revenues of $7.6B. HP's net income of $406M is higher than Hewlett Packard Enterprise's net income of -$1.1B. Notably, HP's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.55x while Hewlett Packard Enterprise's PE ratio is 18.31x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for HP is 0.44x versus 0.78x for Hewlett Packard Enterprise. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

NVIDIA has a net margin of 3.07% compared to HP's net margin of 42.61%. HP's return on equity of -- beat NVIDIA's return on equity of 114.12%.

HP has a consensus price target of $27.21, signalling upside risk potential of 9.99%. On the other hand NVIDIA has an analysts' consensus of $172.11 which suggests that it could grow by 18.7%. Given that NVIDIA has higher upside potential than HP, analysts believe NVIDIA is more attractive than HP.

HP has a beta of 1.303, which suggesting that the stock is 30.342% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NVIDIA has a beta of 2.121, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 112.079%.

HP has a quarterly dividend of $0.29 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.62%. NVIDIA offers a yield of 0.03% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. HP pays 38.74% of its earnings as a dividend. NVIDIA pays out 1.14% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

HP quarterly revenues are $13.2B, which are smaller than NVIDIA quarterly revenues of $44.1B. HP's net income of $406M is lower than NVIDIA's net income of $18.8B. Notably, HP's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.55x while NVIDIA's PE ratio is 46.77x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for HP is 0.44x versus 24.15x for NVIDIA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Super Micro Computer has a net margin of 3.07% compared to HP's net margin of 2.37%. HP's return on equity of -- beat Super Micro Computer's return on equity of 19.84%.

HP has a consensus price target of $27.21, signalling upside risk potential of 9.99%. On the other hand Super Micro Computer has an analysts' consensus of $42.93 which suggests that it could fall by -0.99%. Given that HP has higher upside potential than Super Micro Computer, analysts believe HP is more attractive than Super Micro Computer.

HP has a beta of 1.303, which suggesting that the stock is 30.342% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Super Micro Computer has a beta of 1.403, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 40.293%.

HP has a quarterly dividend of $0.29 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.62%. Super Micro Computer offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. HP pays 38.74% of its earnings as a dividend. Super Micro Computer pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. HP's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

HP quarterly revenues are $13.2B, which are larger than Super Micro Computer quarterly revenues of $4.6B. HP's net income of $406M is higher than Super Micro Computer's net income of $108.8M. Notably, HP's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.55x while Super Micro Computer's PE ratio is 22.81x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for HP is 0.44x versus 1.28x for Super Micro Computer. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.