Financhill
Sell
34

FLS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Last price:
$46.50
Seasonality move :
-1.16%
Day range:
$46.28 - $47.26
52-week range:
$37.34 - $65.08
Dividend yield:
1.81%
P/E ratio:
21.71x
P/S ratio:
1.33x
P/B ratio:
2.92x
Volume:
2.5M
Avg. volume:
2M
1-year change:
-2.05%
Market cap:
$6.1B
Revenue:
$4.6B
EPS (TTM):
$2.14

Price Performance History

Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Competitors

Company Revenue Forecast Earnings Forecast Revenue Growth Forecast Earnings Growth Forecast Analyst Price Target Median
FLS
Flowserve
$1.2B $0.80 5.56% 41.68% $62.50
GEV
GE Vernova
$9.2B $1.55 6.8% -69.49% $450.69
GGG
Graco
$523M $0.67 6.75% 1.95% $88.03
GTLS
Chart Industries
$1.2B $3.34 6.82% 139.69% $208.22
OPTT
Ocean Power Technologies
-- -- -- -- --
SIF
SIFCO Industries
-- -- -- -- --
Company Price Analyst Target Market Cap P/E Ratio Dividend per Share Dividend Yield Price / LTM Sales
FLS
Flowserve
$46.46 $62.50 $6.1B 21.71x $0.21 1.81% 1.33x
GEV
GE Vernova
$478.45 $450.69 $130.6B 68.94x $0.25 0.11% 3.73x
GGG
Graco
$83.54 $88.03 $14B 29.52x $0.28 1.27% 6.69x
GTLS
Chart Industries
$144.21 $208.22 $6.6B 29.13x $0.00 0% 1.59x
OPTT
Ocean Power Technologies
$0.52 -- $88.3M -- $0.00 0% 8.44x
SIF
SIFCO Industries
$3.69 -- $22.8M -- $0.00 0% 0.31x
Company Total Debt / Total Capital Beta Debt to Equity Quick Ratio
FLS
Flowserve
41.83% 2.054 23.16% 1.37x
GEV
GE Vernova
-- 2.033 -- 0.74x
GGG
Graco
1.1% 1.036 0.53% 2.39x
GTLS
Chart Industries
55.43% 4.151 56% 1.09x
OPTT
Ocean Power Technologies
-- 7.324 -- 2.79x
SIF
SIFCO Industries
27.25% 3.011 70.95% 0.90x
Company Gross Profit Operating Income Return on Invested Capital Return on Common Equity EBIT Margin Free Cash Flow
FLS
Flowserve
$369.3M $126.2M 8.29% 13.71% 10.17% -$61.7M
GEV
GE Vernova
$1.5B $43M 18.93% 19.05% 0.54% $975M
GGG
Graco
$277.7M $144M 19.56% 19.79% 28.81% $114.8M
GTLS
Chart Industries
$339.8M $152.3M 3.74% 8.5% 14.88% -$80.1M
OPTT
Ocean Power Technologies
$197K -$5.9M -92.45% -92.45% -712.12% -$4M
SIF
SIFCO Industries
$1.6M -$781K -7.5% -13.08% -4.3% $2.7M

Flowserve vs. Competitors

  • Which has Higher Returns FLS or GEV?

    GE Vernova has a net margin of 6.46% compared to Flowserve's net margin of 3.16%. Flowserve's return on equity of 13.71% beat GE Vernova's return on equity of 19.05%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    FLS
    Flowserve
    32.27% $0.56 $3.6B
    GEV
    GE Vernova
    18.3% $0.91 $9.7B
  • What do Analysts Say About FLS or GEV?

    Flowserve has a consensus price target of $62.50, signalling upside risk potential of 34.52%. On the other hand GE Vernova has an analysts' consensus of $450.69 which suggests that it could fall by -5.8%. Given that Flowserve has higher upside potential than GE Vernova, analysts believe Flowserve is more attractive than GE Vernova.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    FLS
    Flowserve
    8 2 0
    GEV
    GE Vernova
    14 8 1
  • Is FLS or GEV More Risky?

    Flowserve has a beta of 1.256, which suggesting that the stock is 25.601% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison GE Vernova has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock FLS or GEV?

    Flowserve has a quarterly dividend of $0.21 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.81%. GE Vernova offers a yield of 0.11% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. Flowserve pays 39.06% of its earnings as a dividend. GE Vernova pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Flowserve's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios FLS or GEV?

    Flowserve quarterly revenues are $1.1B, which are smaller than GE Vernova quarterly revenues of $8B. Flowserve's net income of $73.9M is lower than GE Vernova's net income of $254M. Notably, Flowserve's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.71x while GE Vernova's PE ratio is 68.94x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Flowserve is 1.33x versus 3.73x for GE Vernova. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    FLS
    Flowserve
    1.33x 21.71x $1.1B $73.9M
    GEV
    GE Vernova
    3.73x 68.94x $8B $254M
  • Which has Higher Returns FLS or GGG?

    Graco has a net margin of 6.46% compared to Flowserve's net margin of 23.49%. Flowserve's return on equity of 13.71% beat Graco's return on equity of 19.79%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    FLS
    Flowserve
    32.27% $0.56 $3.6B
    GGG
    Graco
    52.57% $0.72 $2.5B
  • What do Analysts Say About FLS or GGG?

    Flowserve has a consensus price target of $62.50, signalling upside risk potential of 34.52%. On the other hand Graco has an analysts' consensus of $88.03 which suggests that it could grow by 6.04%. Given that Flowserve has higher upside potential than Graco, analysts believe Flowserve is more attractive than Graco.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    FLS
    Flowserve
    8 2 0
    GGG
    Graco
    2 8 0
  • Is FLS or GGG More Risky?

    Flowserve has a beta of 1.256, which suggesting that the stock is 25.601% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Graco has a beta of 1.075, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.465%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock FLS or GGG?

    Flowserve has a quarterly dividend of $0.21 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.81%. Graco offers a yield of 1.27% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share. Flowserve pays 39.06% of its earnings as a dividend. Graco pays out 35.4% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios FLS or GGG?

    Flowserve quarterly revenues are $1.1B, which are larger than Graco quarterly revenues of $528.3M. Flowserve's net income of $73.9M is lower than Graco's net income of $124.1M. Notably, Flowserve's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.71x while Graco's PE ratio is 29.52x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Flowserve is 1.33x versus 6.69x for Graco. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    FLS
    Flowserve
    1.33x 21.71x $1.1B $73.9M
    GGG
    Graco
    6.69x 29.52x $528.3M $124.1M
  • Which has Higher Returns FLS or GTLS?

    Chart Industries has a net margin of 6.46% compared to Flowserve's net margin of 4.94%. Flowserve's return on equity of 13.71% beat Chart Industries's return on equity of 8.5%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    FLS
    Flowserve
    32.27% $0.56 $3.6B
    GTLS
    Chart Industries
    33.93% $0.94 $6.9B
  • What do Analysts Say About FLS or GTLS?

    Flowserve has a consensus price target of $62.50, signalling upside risk potential of 34.52%. On the other hand Chart Industries has an analysts' consensus of $208.22 which suggests that it could grow by 44.39%. Given that Chart Industries has higher upside potential than Flowserve, analysts believe Chart Industries is more attractive than Flowserve.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    FLS
    Flowserve
    8 2 0
    GTLS
    Chart Industries
    12 4 0
  • Is FLS or GTLS More Risky?

    Flowserve has a beta of 1.256, which suggesting that the stock is 25.601% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Chart Industries has a beta of 1.706, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 70.564%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock FLS or GTLS?

    Flowserve has a quarterly dividend of $0.21 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.81%. Chart Industries offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Flowserve pays 39.06% of its earnings as a dividend. Chart Industries pays out 12.45% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios FLS or GTLS?

    Flowserve quarterly revenues are $1.1B, which are larger than Chart Industries quarterly revenues of $1B. Flowserve's net income of $73.9M is higher than Chart Industries's net income of $49.5M. Notably, Flowserve's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.71x while Chart Industries's PE ratio is 29.13x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Flowserve is 1.33x versus 1.59x for Chart Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    FLS
    Flowserve
    1.33x 21.71x $1.1B $73.9M
    GTLS
    Chart Industries
    1.59x 29.13x $1B $49.5M
  • Which has Higher Returns FLS or OPTT?

    Ocean Power Technologies has a net margin of 6.46% compared to Flowserve's net margin of -814.55%. Flowserve's return on equity of 13.71% beat Ocean Power Technologies's return on equity of -92.45%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    FLS
    Flowserve
    32.27% $0.56 $3.6B
    OPTT
    Ocean Power Technologies
    23.88% -$0.04 $28.9M
  • What do Analysts Say About FLS or OPTT?

    Flowserve has a consensus price target of $62.50, signalling upside risk potential of 34.52%. On the other hand Ocean Power Technologies has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Flowserve has higher upside potential than Ocean Power Technologies, analysts believe Flowserve is more attractive than Ocean Power Technologies.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    FLS
    Flowserve
    8 2 0
    OPTT
    Ocean Power Technologies
    0 0 0
  • Is FLS or OPTT More Risky?

    Flowserve has a beta of 1.256, which suggesting that the stock is 25.601% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ocean Power Technologies has a beta of 2.687, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 168.701%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock FLS or OPTT?

    Flowserve has a quarterly dividend of $0.21 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.81%. Ocean Power Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Flowserve pays 39.06% of its earnings as a dividend. Ocean Power Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Flowserve's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios FLS or OPTT?

    Flowserve quarterly revenues are $1.1B, which are larger than Ocean Power Technologies quarterly revenues of $825K. Flowserve's net income of $73.9M is higher than Ocean Power Technologies's net income of -$6.7M. Notably, Flowserve's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.71x while Ocean Power Technologies's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Flowserve is 1.33x versus 8.44x for Ocean Power Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    FLS
    Flowserve
    1.33x 21.71x $1.1B $73.9M
    OPTT
    Ocean Power Technologies
    8.44x -- $825K -$6.7M
  • Which has Higher Returns FLS or SIF?

    SIFCO Industries has a net margin of 6.46% compared to Flowserve's net margin of -7.32%. Flowserve's return on equity of 13.71% beat SIFCO Industries's return on equity of -13.08%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    FLS
    Flowserve
    32.27% $0.56 $3.6B
    SIF
    SIFCO Industries
    8.25% -$0.23 $44.5M
  • What do Analysts Say About FLS or SIF?

    Flowserve has a consensus price target of $62.50, signalling upside risk potential of 34.52%. On the other hand SIFCO Industries has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 234.8%. Given that SIFCO Industries has higher upside potential than Flowserve, analysts believe SIFCO Industries is more attractive than Flowserve.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    FLS
    Flowserve
    8 2 0
    SIF
    SIFCO Industries
    0 0 0
  • Is FLS or SIF More Risky?

    Flowserve has a beta of 1.256, which suggesting that the stock is 25.601% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SIFCO Industries has a beta of 0.966, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.374%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock FLS or SIF?

    Flowserve has a quarterly dividend of $0.21 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.81%. SIFCO Industries offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Flowserve pays 39.06% of its earnings as a dividend. SIFCO Industries pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Flowserve's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios FLS or SIF?

    Flowserve quarterly revenues are $1.1B, which are larger than SIFCO Industries quarterly revenues of $19M. Flowserve's net income of $73.9M is higher than SIFCO Industries's net income of -$1.4M. Notably, Flowserve's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.71x while SIFCO Industries's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Flowserve is 1.33x versus 0.31x for SIFCO Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    FLS
    Flowserve
    1.33x 21.71x $1.1B $73.9M
    SIF
    SIFCO Industries
    0.31x -- $19M -$1.4M

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Popular

Where Will AST SpaceMobile Be In 5 Years?
Where Will AST SpaceMobile Be In 5 Years?

Ever tried to send a text from the Nevada desert…

Is TTD The Big Winner If Pharma Ads Are Banned?
Is TTD The Big Winner If Pharma Ads Are Banned?

Last week, Senators Bernie Sanders and Angus King introduced a…

Is Palantir Stock Overvalued?
Is Palantir Stock Overvalued?

By every traditional yardstick, including a price‑to‑sales well above 100,…

Stock Ideas

Buy
65
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.5T
P/E Ratio: 40x

Buy
57
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.5T
P/E Ratio: 48x

Sell
39
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $2.9T
P/E Ratio: 32x

Alerts

Sell
11
VEON alert for Jun 14

VEON [VEON] is down 18.57% over the past day.

Buy
74
DAVE alert for Jun 14

Dave [DAVE] is down 12.68% over the past day.

Buy
54
DAR alert for Jun 14

Darling Ingredients [DAR] is up 9.12% over the past day.

THE #1 STOCK ANALYSIS TOOL
TO MAKE SMARTER BUY AND SELL DECISIONS

Show me the best stock