FLS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

GE Vernova has a net margin of 6.46% compared to Flowserve's net margin of 3.16%. Flowserve's return on equity of 13.71% beat GE Vernova's return on equity of 19.05%.

Flowserve has a consensus price target of $62.50, signalling upside risk potential of 25.23%. On the other hand GE Vernova has an analysts' consensus of $436.03 which suggests that it could fall by -7.81%. Given that Flowserve has higher upside potential than GE Vernova, analysts believe Flowserve is more attractive than GE Vernova.

Flowserve has a beta of 1.211, which suggesting that the stock is 21.06% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison GE Vernova has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Flowserve has a quarterly dividend of $0.21 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.68%. GE Vernova offers a yield of 0.11% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. Flowserve pays 39.06% of its earnings as a dividend. GE Vernova pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Flowserve's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Flowserve quarterly revenues are $1.1B, which are smaller than GE Vernova quarterly revenues of $8B. Flowserve's net income of $73.9M is lower than GE Vernova's net income of $254M. Notably, Flowserve's price-to-earnings ratio is 23.32x while GE Vernova's PE ratio is 68.15x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Flowserve is 1.43x versus 3.69x for GE Vernova. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

IDEX has a net margin of 6.46% compared to Flowserve's net margin of 11.73%. Flowserve's return on equity of 13.71% beat IDEX's return on equity of 12.75%.

Flowserve has a consensus price target of $62.50, signalling upside risk potential of 25.23%. On the other hand IDEX has an analysts' consensus of $208.96 which suggests that it could grow by 15.51%. Given that Flowserve has higher upside potential than IDEX, analysts believe Flowserve is more attractive than IDEX.

Flowserve has a beta of 1.211, which suggesting that the stock is 21.06% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison IDEX has a beta of 1.067, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 6.669%.

Flowserve has a quarterly dividend of $0.21 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.68%. IDEX offers a yield of 1.54% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.71 per share. Flowserve pays 39.06% of its earnings as a dividend. IDEX pays out 40.65% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Flowserve quarterly revenues are $1.1B, which are larger than IDEX quarterly revenues of $814.3M. Flowserve's net income of $73.9M is lower than IDEX's net income of $95.5M. Notably, Flowserve's price-to-earnings ratio is 23.32x while IDEX's PE ratio is 28.67x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Flowserve is 1.43x versus 4.18x for IDEX. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Ocean Power Technologies has a net margin of 6.46% compared to Flowserve's net margin of -814.55%. Flowserve's return on equity of 13.71% beat Ocean Power Technologies's return on equity of -92.45%.

Flowserve has a consensus price target of $62.50, signalling upside risk potential of 25.23%. On the other hand Ocean Power Technologies has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Flowserve has higher upside potential than Ocean Power Technologies, analysts believe Flowserve is more attractive than Ocean Power Technologies.

Flowserve has a beta of 1.211, which suggesting that the stock is 21.06% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ocean Power Technologies has a beta of 2.642, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 164.159%.

Flowserve has a quarterly dividend of $0.21 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.68%. Ocean Power Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Flowserve pays 39.06% of its earnings as a dividend. Ocean Power Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Flowserve's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Flowserve quarterly revenues are $1.1B, which are larger than Ocean Power Technologies quarterly revenues of $825K. Flowserve's net income of $73.9M is higher than Ocean Power Technologies's net income of -$6.7M. Notably, Flowserve's price-to-earnings ratio is 23.32x while Ocean Power Technologies's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Flowserve is 1.43x versus 7.69x for Ocean Power Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SIFCO Industries has a net margin of 6.46% compared to Flowserve's net margin of -7.32%. Flowserve's return on equity of 13.71% beat SIFCO Industries's return on equity of -13.08%.

Flowserve has a consensus price target of $62.50, signalling upside risk potential of 25.23%. On the other hand SIFCO Industries has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 294.1%. Given that SIFCO Industries has higher upside potential than Flowserve, analysts believe SIFCO Industries is more attractive than Flowserve.

Flowserve has a beta of 1.211, which suggesting that the stock is 21.06% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SIFCO Industries has a beta of 1.035, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.542%.

Flowserve has a quarterly dividend of $0.21 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.68%. SIFCO Industries offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Flowserve pays 39.06% of its earnings as a dividend. SIFCO Industries pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Flowserve's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Flowserve quarterly revenues are $1.1B, which are larger than SIFCO Industries quarterly revenues of $19M. Flowserve's net income of $73.9M is higher than SIFCO Industries's net income of -$1.4M. Notably, Flowserve's price-to-earnings ratio is 23.32x while SIFCO Industries's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Flowserve is 1.43x versus 0.26x for SIFCO Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.