FLS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Graco has a net margin of 6.46% compared to Flowserve's net margin of 23.49%. Flowserve's return on equity of 13.71% beat Graco's return on equity of 19.79%.

Flowserve has a consensus price target of $62.50, signalling upside risk potential of 34.52%. On the other hand Graco has an analysts' consensus of $88.03 which suggests that it could grow by 6.04%. Given that Flowserve has higher upside potential than Graco, analysts believe Flowserve is more attractive than Graco.

Flowserve has a beta of 1.256, which suggesting that the stock is 25.601% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Graco has a beta of 1.075, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.465%.

Flowserve has a quarterly dividend of $0.21 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.81%. Graco offers a yield of 1.27% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share. Flowserve pays 39.06% of its earnings as a dividend. Graco pays out 35.4% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Flowserve quarterly revenues are $1.1B, which are larger than Graco quarterly revenues of $528.3M. Flowserve's net income of $73.9M is lower than Graco's net income of $124.1M. Notably, Flowserve's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.71x while Graco's PE ratio is 29.52x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Flowserve is 1.33x versus 6.69x for Graco. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Chart Industries has a net margin of 6.46% compared to Flowserve's net margin of 4.94%. Flowserve's return on equity of 13.71% beat Chart Industries's return on equity of 8.5%.

Flowserve has a consensus price target of $62.50, signalling upside risk potential of 34.52%. On the other hand Chart Industries has an analysts' consensus of $208.22 which suggests that it could grow by 44.39%. Given that Chart Industries has higher upside potential than Flowserve, analysts believe Chart Industries is more attractive than Flowserve.

Flowserve has a beta of 1.256, which suggesting that the stock is 25.601% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Chart Industries has a beta of 1.706, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 70.564%.

Flowserve has a quarterly dividend of $0.21 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.81%. Chart Industries offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Flowserve pays 39.06% of its earnings as a dividend. Chart Industries pays out 12.45% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Flowserve quarterly revenues are $1.1B, which are larger than Chart Industries quarterly revenues of $1B. Flowserve's net income of $73.9M is higher than Chart Industries's net income of $49.5M. Notably, Flowserve's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.71x while Chart Industries's PE ratio is 29.13x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Flowserve is 1.33x versus 1.59x for Chart Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Ocean Power Technologies has a net margin of 6.46% compared to Flowserve's net margin of -814.55%. Flowserve's return on equity of 13.71% beat Ocean Power Technologies's return on equity of -92.45%.

Flowserve has a consensus price target of $62.50, signalling upside risk potential of 34.52%. On the other hand Ocean Power Technologies has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Flowserve has higher upside potential than Ocean Power Technologies, analysts believe Flowserve is more attractive than Ocean Power Technologies.

Flowserve has a beta of 1.256, which suggesting that the stock is 25.601% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ocean Power Technologies has a beta of 2.687, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 168.701%.

Flowserve has a quarterly dividend of $0.21 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.81%. Ocean Power Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Flowserve pays 39.06% of its earnings as a dividend. Ocean Power Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Flowserve's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Flowserve quarterly revenues are $1.1B, which are larger than Ocean Power Technologies quarterly revenues of $825K. Flowserve's net income of $73.9M is higher than Ocean Power Technologies's net income of -$6.7M. Notably, Flowserve's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.71x while Ocean Power Technologies's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Flowserve is 1.33x versus 8.44x for Ocean Power Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SIFCO Industries has a net margin of 6.46% compared to Flowserve's net margin of -7.32%. Flowserve's return on equity of 13.71% beat SIFCO Industries's return on equity of -13.08%.

Flowserve has a consensus price target of $62.50, signalling upside risk potential of 34.52%. On the other hand SIFCO Industries has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 234.8%. Given that SIFCO Industries has higher upside potential than Flowserve, analysts believe SIFCO Industries is more attractive than Flowserve.

Flowserve has a beta of 1.256, which suggesting that the stock is 25.601% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SIFCO Industries has a beta of 0.966, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.374%.

Flowserve has a quarterly dividend of $0.21 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.81%. SIFCO Industries offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Flowserve pays 39.06% of its earnings as a dividend. SIFCO Industries pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Flowserve's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Flowserve quarterly revenues are $1.1B, which are larger than SIFCO Industries quarterly revenues of $19M. Flowserve's net income of $73.9M is higher than SIFCO Industries's net income of -$1.4M. Notably, Flowserve's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.71x while SIFCO Industries's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Flowserve is 1.33x versus 0.31x for SIFCO Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.