GGG Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Broadwind has a net margin of 23.49% compared to Graco's net margin of -1%. Graco's return on equity of 19.79% beat Broadwind's return on equity of -1.23%.

Graco has a consensus price target of $88.03, signalling upside risk potential of 4.64%. On the other hand Broadwind has an analysts' consensus of $4.00 which suggests that it could grow by 143.16%. Given that Broadwind has higher upside potential than Graco, analysts believe Broadwind is more attractive than Graco.

Graco has a beta of 1.094, which suggesting that the stock is 9.38% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Broadwind has a beta of 1.607, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 60.721%.

Graco has a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.25%. Broadwind offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Graco pays 35.4% of its earnings as a dividend. Broadwind pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Graco's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Graco quarterly revenues are $528.3M, which are larger than Broadwind quarterly revenues of $36.8M. Graco's net income of $124.1M is higher than Broadwind's net income of -$370K. Notably, Graco's price-to-earnings ratio is 29.92x while Broadwind's PE ratio is 35.43x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Graco is 6.78x versus 0.26x for Broadwind. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

CVD Equipment has a net margin of 23.49% compared to Graco's net margin of 4.33%. Graco's return on equity of 19.79% beat CVD Equipment's return on equity of -0.26%.

Graco has a consensus price target of $88.03, signalling upside risk potential of 4.64%. On the other hand CVD Equipment has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 428.93%. Given that CVD Equipment has higher upside potential than Graco, analysts believe CVD Equipment is more attractive than Graco.

Graco has a beta of 1.094, which suggesting that the stock is 9.38% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CVD Equipment has a beta of 0.736, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 26.36%.

Graco has a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.25%. CVD Equipment offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Graco pays 35.4% of its earnings as a dividend. CVD Equipment pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Graco's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Graco quarterly revenues are $528.3M, which are larger than CVD Equipment quarterly revenues of $8.3M. Graco's net income of $124.1M is higher than CVD Equipment's net income of $360K. Notably, Graco's price-to-earnings ratio is 29.92x while CVD Equipment's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Graco is 6.78x versus 0.68x for CVD Equipment. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Ocean Power Technologies has a net margin of 23.49% compared to Graco's net margin of -814.55%. Graco's return on equity of 19.79% beat Ocean Power Technologies's return on equity of -92.45%.

Graco has a consensus price target of $88.03, signalling upside risk potential of 4.64%. On the other hand Ocean Power Technologies has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Graco has higher upside potential than Ocean Power Technologies, analysts believe Graco is more attractive than Ocean Power Technologies.

Graco has a beta of 1.094, which suggesting that the stock is 9.38% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ocean Power Technologies has a beta of 2.642, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 164.159%.

Graco has a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.25%. Ocean Power Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Graco pays 35.4% of its earnings as a dividend. Ocean Power Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Graco's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Graco quarterly revenues are $528.3M, which are larger than Ocean Power Technologies quarterly revenues of $825K. Graco's net income of $124.1M is higher than Ocean Power Technologies's net income of -$6.7M. Notably, Graco's price-to-earnings ratio is 29.92x while Ocean Power Technologies's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Graco is 6.78x versus 7.69x for Ocean Power Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SIFCO Industries has a net margin of 23.49% compared to Graco's net margin of -7.32%. Graco's return on equity of 19.79% beat SIFCO Industries's return on equity of -13.08%.

Graco has a consensus price target of $88.03, signalling upside risk potential of 4.64%. On the other hand SIFCO Industries has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 294.1%. Given that SIFCO Industries has higher upside potential than Graco, analysts believe SIFCO Industries is more attractive than Graco.

Graco has a beta of 1.094, which suggesting that the stock is 9.38% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SIFCO Industries has a beta of 1.035, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.542%.

Graco has a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.25%. SIFCO Industries offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Graco pays 35.4% of its earnings as a dividend. SIFCO Industries pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Graco's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Graco quarterly revenues are $528.3M, which are larger than SIFCO Industries quarterly revenues of $19M. Graco's net income of $124.1M is higher than SIFCO Industries's net income of -$1.4M. Notably, Graco's price-to-earnings ratio is 29.92x while SIFCO Industries's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Graco is 6.78x versus 0.26x for SIFCO Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.