FFIV Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

GitLab has a net margin of 19.91% compared to F5's net margin of -16.72%. F5's return on equity of 19.89% beat GitLab's return on equity of 1.66%.

F5 has a consensus price target of $289.84, signalling downside risk potential of -0.17%. On the other hand GitLab has an analysts' consensus of $63.22 which suggests that it could grow by 50.24%. Given that GitLab has higher upside potential than F5, analysts believe GitLab is more attractive than F5.

F5 has a beta of 1.004, which suggesting that the stock is 0.40500000000001% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison GitLab has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

F5 has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. GitLab offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. F5 pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. GitLab pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

F5 quarterly revenues are $731.1M, which are larger than GitLab quarterly revenues of $214.5M. F5's net income of $145.5M is higher than GitLab's net income of -$35.9M. Notably, F5's price-to-earnings ratio is 27.55x while GitLab's PE ratio is 420.80x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for F5 is 5.83x versus 8.65x for GitLab. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Palantir Technologies has a net margin of 19.91% compared to F5's net margin of 24.22%. F5's return on equity of 19.89% beat Palantir Technologies's return on equity of 12.3%.

F5 has a consensus price target of $289.84, signalling downside risk potential of -0.17%. On the other hand Palantir Technologies has an analysts' consensus of $101.32 which suggests that it could fall by -28.35%. Given that Palantir Technologies has more downside risk than F5, analysts believe F5 is more attractive than Palantir Technologies.

F5 has a beta of 1.004, which suggesting that the stock is 0.40500000000001% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Palantir Technologies has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

F5 has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Palantir Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. F5 pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Palantir Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

F5 quarterly revenues are $731.1M, which are smaller than Palantir Technologies quarterly revenues of $883.9M. F5's net income of $145.5M is lower than Palantir Technologies's net income of $214M. Notably, F5's price-to-earnings ratio is 27.55x while Palantir Technologies's PE ratio is 614.83x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for F5 is 5.83x versus 112.99x for Palantir Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SoundHound AI has a net margin of 19.91% compared to F5's net margin of -748.63%. F5's return on equity of 19.89% beat SoundHound AI's return on equity of -74.79%.

F5 has a consensus price target of $289.84, signalling downside risk potential of -0.17%. On the other hand SoundHound AI has an analysts' consensus of $11.81 which suggests that it could grow by 21.53%. Given that SoundHound AI has higher upside potential than F5, analysts believe SoundHound AI is more attractive than F5.

F5 has a beta of 1.004, which suggesting that the stock is 0.40500000000001% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SoundHound AI has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

F5 has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. SoundHound AI offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. F5 pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. SoundHound AI pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

F5 quarterly revenues are $731.1M, which are larger than SoundHound AI quarterly revenues of $29.1M. F5's net income of $145.5M is higher than SoundHound AI's net income of $129.9M. Notably, F5's price-to-earnings ratio is 27.55x while SoundHound AI's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for F5 is 5.83x versus 35.22x for SoundHound AI. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Zscaler has a net margin of 19.91% compared to F5's net margin of -0.61%. F5's return on equity of 19.89% beat Zscaler's return on equity of -2.69%.

F5 has a consensus price target of $289.84, signalling downside risk potential of -0.17%. On the other hand Zscaler has an analysts' consensus of $306.49 which suggests that it could grow by 0.48%. Given that Zscaler has higher upside potential than F5, analysts believe Zscaler is more attractive than F5.

F5 has a beta of 1.004, which suggesting that the stock is 0.40500000000001% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Zscaler has a beta of 1.092, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 9.202%.

F5 has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Zscaler offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. F5 pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Zscaler pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

F5 quarterly revenues are $731.1M, which are larger than Zscaler quarterly revenues of $678M. F5's net income of $145.5M is higher than Zscaler's net income of -$4.1M. Notably, F5's price-to-earnings ratio is 27.55x while Zscaler's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for F5 is 5.83x versus 18.34x for Zscaler. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.