EQT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Antero Resources has a net margin of 10.01% compared to EQT's net margin of 14.93%. EQT's return on equity of 1.86% beat Antero Resources's return on equity of 3.16%.

EQT has a consensus price target of $58.99, signalling downside risk potential of -2.4%. On the other hand Antero Resources has an analysts' consensus of $44.86 which suggests that it could grow by 2.46%. Given that Antero Resources has higher upside potential than EQT, analysts believe Antero Resources is more attractive than EQT.

EQT has a beta of 0.647, which suggesting that the stock is 35.311% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Antero Resources has a beta of 0.673, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 32.741%.

EQT has a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.04%. Antero Resources offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. EQT pays 141.64% of its earnings as a dividend. Antero Resources pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

EQT quarterly revenues are $2.4B, which are larger than Antero Resources quarterly revenues of $1.4B. EQT's net income of $242.1M is higher than Antero Resources's net income of $208M. Notably, EQT's price-to-earnings ratio is 106.04x while Antero Resources's PE ratio is 50.91x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for EQT is 5.31x versus 3.11x for Antero Resources. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Devon Energy has a net margin of 10.01% compared to EQT's net margin of 11.1%. EQT's return on equity of 1.86% beat Devon Energy's return on equity of 20.2%.

EQT has a consensus price target of $58.99, signalling downside risk potential of -2.4%. On the other hand Devon Energy has an analysts' consensus of $42.78 which suggests that it could grow by 24.77%. Given that Devon Energy has higher upside potential than EQT, analysts believe Devon Energy is more attractive than EQT.

EQT has a beta of 0.647, which suggesting that the stock is 35.311% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Devon Energy has a beta of 1.043, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 4.274%.

EQT has a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.04%. Devon Energy offers a yield of 3.33% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share. EQT pays 141.64% of its earnings as a dividend. Devon Energy pays out 32.41% of its earnings as a dividend. Devon Energy's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but EQT's is not.

EQT quarterly revenues are $2.4B, which are smaller than Devon Energy quarterly revenues of $4.5B. EQT's net income of $242.1M is lower than Devon Energy's net income of $494M. Notably, EQT's price-to-earnings ratio is 106.04x while Devon Energy's PE ratio is 7.81x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for EQT is 5.31x versus 1.30x for Devon Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Expand Energy has a net margin of 10.01% compared to EQT's net margin of -11.34%. EQT's return on equity of 1.86% beat Expand Energy's return on equity of -7.49%.

EQT has a consensus price target of $58.99, signalling downside risk potential of -2.4%. On the other hand Expand Energy has an analysts' consensus of $129.19 which suggests that it could grow by 5.85%. Given that Expand Energy has higher upside potential than EQT, analysts believe Expand Energy is more attractive than EQT.

EQT has a beta of 0.647, which suggesting that the stock is 35.311% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Expand Energy has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

EQT has a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.04%. Expand Energy offers a yield of 1.89% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.58 per share. EQT pays 141.64% of its earnings as a dividend. Expand Energy pays out -54.34% of its earnings as a dividend.

EQT quarterly revenues are $2.4B, which are larger than Expand Energy quarterly revenues of $2.2B. EQT's net income of $242.1M is higher than Expand Energy's net income of -$249M. Notably, EQT's price-to-earnings ratio is 106.04x while Expand Energy's PE ratio is 63.23x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for EQT is 5.31x versus 4.18x for Expand Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Diamondback Energy has a net margin of 10.01% compared to EQT's net margin of 34.86%. EQT's return on equity of 1.86% beat Diamondback Energy's return on equity of 12.66%.

EQT has a consensus price target of $58.99, signalling downside risk potential of -2.4%. On the other hand Diamondback Energy has an analysts' consensus of $182.10 which suggests that it could grow by 22.34%. Given that Diamondback Energy has higher upside potential than EQT, analysts believe Diamondback Energy is more attractive than EQT.

EQT has a beta of 0.647, which suggesting that the stock is 35.311% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Diamondback Energy has a beta of 1.062, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 6.189%.

EQT has a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.04%. Diamondback Energy offers a yield of 3.52% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.00 per share. EQT pays 141.64% of its earnings as a dividend. Diamondback Energy pays out 47.27% of its earnings as a dividend. Diamondback Energy's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but EQT's is not.

EQT quarterly revenues are $2.4B, which are smaller than Diamondback Energy quarterly revenues of $4B. EQT's net income of $242.1M is lower than Diamondback Energy's net income of $1.4B. Notably, EQT's price-to-earnings ratio is 106.04x while Diamondback Energy's PE ratio is 9.10x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for EQT is 5.31x versus 2.80x for Diamondback Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.