ED Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

CMS Energy has a net margin of 14.37% compared to Consolidated Edison's net margin of 14.52%. Consolidated Edison's return on equity of 8.59% beat CMS Energy's return on equity of 12.59%.

Consolidated Edison has a consensus price target of $99.88, signalling upside risk potential of 11.49%. On the other hand CMS Energy has an analysts' consensus of $71.51 which suggests that it could grow by 7.1%. Given that Consolidated Edison has higher upside potential than CMS Energy, analysts believe Consolidated Edison is more attractive than CMS Energy.

Consolidated Edison has a beta of 0.363, which suggesting that the stock is 63.696% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CMS Energy has a beta of 0.416, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 58.391%.

Consolidated Edison has a quarterly dividend of $0.83 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.71%. CMS Energy offers a yield of 3.08% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.52 per share. Consolidated Edison pays 43.51% of its earnings as a dividend. CMS Energy pays out 65.28% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Consolidated Edison quarterly revenues are $4.1B, which are larger than CMS Energy quarterly revenues of $1.7B. Consolidated Edison's net income of $588M is higher than CMS Energy's net income of $253M. Notably, Consolidated Edison's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.84x while CMS Energy's PE ratio is 19.15x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Consolidated Edison is 2.07x versus 2.65x for CMS Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Clearway Energy has a net margin of 14.37% compared to Consolidated Edison's net margin of 7.41%. Consolidated Edison's return on equity of 8.59% beat Clearway Energy's return on equity of 2.38%.

Consolidated Edison has a consensus price target of $99.88, signalling upside risk potential of 11.49%. On the other hand Clearway Energy has an analysts' consensus of $29.70 which suggests that it could grow by 34.53%. Given that Clearway Energy has higher upside potential than Consolidated Edison, analysts believe Clearway Energy is more attractive than Consolidated Edison.

Consolidated Edison has a beta of 0.363, which suggesting that the stock is 63.696% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Clearway Energy has a beta of 0.955, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 4.492%.

Consolidated Edison has a quarterly dividend of $0.83 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.71%. Clearway Energy offers a yield of 6.58% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.42 per share. Consolidated Edison pays 43.51% of its earnings as a dividend. Clearway Energy pays out 393.67% of its earnings as a dividend. Consolidated Edison's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Clearway Energy's is not.

Consolidated Edison quarterly revenues are $4.1B, which are larger than Clearway Energy quarterly revenues of $486M. Consolidated Edison's net income of $588M is higher than Clearway Energy's net income of $36M. Notably, Consolidated Edison's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.84x while Clearway Energy's PE ratio is 24.42x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Consolidated Edison is 2.07x versus 2.16x for Clearway Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Talen Energy has a net margin of 14.37% compared to Consolidated Edison's net margin of 30.27%. Consolidated Edison's return on equity of 8.59% beat Talen Energy's return on equity of --.

Consolidated Edison has a consensus price target of $99.88, signalling upside risk potential of 11.49%. On the other hand Talen Energy has an analysts' consensus of $120.00 which suggests that it could grow by 21.63%. Given that Talen Energy has higher upside potential than Consolidated Edison, analysts believe Talen Energy is more attractive than Consolidated Edison.

Consolidated Edison has a beta of 0.363, which suggesting that the stock is 63.696% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Talen Energy has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Consolidated Edison has a quarterly dividend of $0.83 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.71%. Talen Energy offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Consolidated Edison pays 43.51% of its earnings as a dividend. Talen Energy pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Consolidated Edison's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Consolidated Edison quarterly revenues are $4.1B, which are larger than Talen Energy quarterly revenues of $555M. Consolidated Edison's net income of $588M is higher than Talen Energy's net income of $168M. Notably, Consolidated Edison's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.84x while Talen Energy's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Consolidated Edison is 2.07x versus -- for Talen Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Vistra has a net margin of 14.37% compared to Consolidated Edison's net margin of 30.03%. Consolidated Edison's return on equity of 8.59% beat Vistra's return on equity of --.

Consolidated Edison has a consensus price target of $99.88, signalling upside risk potential of 11.49%. On the other hand Vistra has an analysts' consensus of $160.46 which suggests that it could grow by 11.93%. Given that Vistra has higher upside potential than Consolidated Edison, analysts believe Vistra is more attractive than Consolidated Edison.

Consolidated Edison has a beta of 0.363, which suggesting that the stock is 63.696% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Vistra has a beta of 1.160, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 16.026%.

Consolidated Edison has a quarterly dividend of $0.83 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.71%. Vistra offers a yield of 0.61% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.22 per share. Consolidated Edison pays 43.51% of its earnings as a dividend. Vistra pays out 31.01% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Consolidated Edison quarterly revenues are $4.1B, which are smaller than Vistra quarterly revenues of $6.3B. Consolidated Edison's net income of $588M is lower than Vistra's net income of $1.9B. Notably, Consolidated Edison's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.84x while Vistra's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Consolidated Edison is 2.07x versus -- for Vistra. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.