EA Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Paramount Global has a net margin of 13.4% compared to Electronic Arts's net margin of 2.11%. Electronic Arts's return on equity of 15.52% beat Paramount Global's return on equity of -30.44%.

Electronic Arts has a consensus price target of $167.20, signalling upside risk potential of 5.94%. On the other hand Paramount Global has an analysts' consensus of $11.98 which suggests that it could fall by -1.96%. Given that Electronic Arts has higher upside potential than Paramount Global, analysts believe Electronic Arts is more attractive than Paramount Global.

Electronic Arts has a beta of 0.714, which suggesting that the stock is 28.584% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Paramount Global has a beta of 1.193, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 19.348%.

Electronic Arts has a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.48%. Paramount Global offers a yield of 1.64% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. Electronic Arts pays 17.75% of its earnings as a dividend. Paramount Global pays out -2.71% of its earnings as a dividend. Electronic Arts's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Electronic Arts quarterly revenues are $1.9B, which are smaller than Paramount Global quarterly revenues of $7.2B. Electronic Arts's net income of $254M is higher than Paramount Global's net income of $152M. Notably, Electronic Arts's price-to-earnings ratio is 37.22x while Paramount Global's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Electronic Arts is 5.59x versus 0.29x for Paramount Global. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Roblox has a net margin of 13.4% compared to Electronic Arts's net margin of -20.77%. Electronic Arts's return on equity of 15.52% beat Roblox's return on equity of -512.91%.

Electronic Arts has a consensus price target of $167.20, signalling upside risk potential of 5.94%. On the other hand Roblox has an analysts' consensus of $80.88 which suggests that it could fall by -21.36%. Given that Electronic Arts has higher upside potential than Roblox, analysts believe Electronic Arts is more attractive than Roblox.

Electronic Arts has a beta of 0.714, which suggesting that the stock is 28.584% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Roblox has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Electronic Arts has a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.48%. Roblox offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Electronic Arts pays 17.75% of its earnings as a dividend. Roblox pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Electronic Arts's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Electronic Arts quarterly revenues are $1.9B, which are larger than Roblox quarterly revenues of $1B. Electronic Arts's net income of $254M is higher than Roblox's net income of -$215.1M. Notably, Electronic Arts's price-to-earnings ratio is 37.22x while Roblox's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Electronic Arts is 5.59x versus 17.60x for Roblox. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Skillz has a net margin of 13.4% compared to Electronic Arts's net margin of -66.62%. Electronic Arts's return on equity of 15.52% beat Skillz's return on equity of -18.97%.

Electronic Arts has a consensus price target of $167.20, signalling upside risk potential of 5.94%. On the other hand Skillz has an analysts' consensus of $10.25 which suggests that it could grow by 51.18%. Given that Skillz has higher upside potential than Electronic Arts, analysts believe Skillz is more attractive than Electronic Arts.

Electronic Arts has a beta of 0.714, which suggesting that the stock is 28.584% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Skillz has a beta of 2.764, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 176.36%.

Electronic Arts has a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.48%. Skillz offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Electronic Arts pays 17.75% of its earnings as a dividend. Skillz pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Electronic Arts's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Electronic Arts quarterly revenues are $1.9B, which are larger than Skillz quarterly revenues of $22.4M. Electronic Arts's net income of $254M is higher than Skillz's net income of -$14.9M. Notably, Electronic Arts's price-to-earnings ratio is 37.22x while Skillz's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Electronic Arts is 5.59x versus 1.22x for Skillz. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Take-Two Interactive Software has a net margin of 13.4% compared to Electronic Arts's net margin of -235.46%. Electronic Arts's return on equity of 15.52% beat Take-Two Interactive Software's return on equity of -88.53%.

Electronic Arts has a consensus price target of $167.20, signalling upside risk potential of 5.94%. On the other hand Take-Two Interactive Software has an analysts' consensus of $243.05 which suggests that it could grow by 0.58%. Given that Electronic Arts has higher upside potential than Take-Two Interactive Software, analysts believe Electronic Arts is more attractive than Take-Two Interactive Software.

Electronic Arts has a beta of 0.714, which suggesting that the stock is 28.584% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Take-Two Interactive Software has a beta of 1.027, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 2.66%.

Electronic Arts has a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.48%. Take-Two Interactive Software offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Electronic Arts pays 17.75% of its earnings as a dividend. Take-Two Interactive Software pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Electronic Arts's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Electronic Arts quarterly revenues are $1.9B, which are larger than Take-Two Interactive Software quarterly revenues of $1.6B. Electronic Arts's net income of $254M is higher than Take-Two Interactive Software's net income of -$3.7B. Notably, Electronic Arts's price-to-earnings ratio is 37.22x while Take-Two Interactive Software's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Electronic Arts is 5.59x versus 7.51x for Take-Two Interactive Software. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.