SKLZ Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Electronic Arts has a net margin of -66.62% compared to Skillz's net margin of 13.4%. Skillz's return on equity of -18.97% beat Electronic Arts's return on equity of 15.52%.

Skillz has a consensus price target of $10.25, signalling upside risk potential of 48.77%. On the other hand Electronic Arts has an analysts' consensus of $166.80 which suggests that it could grow by 5.6%. Given that Skillz has higher upside potential than Electronic Arts, analysts believe Skillz is more attractive than Electronic Arts.

Skillz has a beta of 2.764, which suggesting that the stock is 176.36% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Electronic Arts has a beta of 0.714, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 28.584%.

Skillz has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Electronic Arts offers a yield of 0.48% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share. Skillz pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Electronic Arts pays out 17.75% of its earnings as a dividend. Electronic Arts's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Skillz quarterly revenues are $22.4M, which are smaller than Electronic Arts quarterly revenues of $1.9B. Skillz's net income of -$14.9M is lower than Electronic Arts's net income of $254M. Notably, Skillz's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Electronic Arts's PE ratio is 37.25x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Skillz is 1.24x versus 5.59x for Electronic Arts. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Golden Matrix Group has a net margin of -66.62% compared to Skillz's net margin of -0.54%. Skillz's return on equity of -18.97% beat Golden Matrix Group's return on equity of -6.44%.

Skillz has a consensus price target of $10.25, signalling upside risk potential of 48.77%. On the other hand Golden Matrix Group has an analysts' consensus of $3.50 which suggests that it could grow by 100%. Given that Golden Matrix Group has higher upside potential than Skillz, analysts believe Golden Matrix Group is more attractive than Skillz.

Skillz has a beta of 2.764, which suggesting that the stock is 176.36% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Golden Matrix Group has a beta of 1.403, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 40.287%.

Skillz has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Golden Matrix Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Skillz pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Golden Matrix Group pays out -51.99% of its earnings as a dividend.

Skillz quarterly revenues are $22.4M, which are smaller than Golden Matrix Group quarterly revenues of $42.7M. Skillz's net income of -$14.9M is lower than Golden Matrix Group's net income of -$231.6K. Notably, Skillz's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Golden Matrix Group's PE ratio is 845.01x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Skillz is 1.24x versus 1.32x for Golden Matrix Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Roblox has a net margin of -66.62% compared to Skillz's net margin of -20.77%. Skillz's return on equity of -18.97% beat Roblox's return on equity of -512.91%.

Skillz has a consensus price target of $10.25, signalling upside risk potential of 48.77%. On the other hand Roblox has an analysts' consensus of $80.88 which suggests that it could fall by -23.58%. Given that Skillz has higher upside potential than Roblox, analysts believe Skillz is more attractive than Roblox.

Skillz has a beta of 2.764, which suggesting that the stock is 176.36% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Roblox has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Skillz has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Roblox offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Skillz pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Roblox pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Skillz quarterly revenues are $22.4M, which are smaller than Roblox quarterly revenues of $1B. Skillz's net income of -$14.9M is higher than Roblox's net income of -$215.1M. Notably, Skillz's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Roblox's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Skillz is 1.24x versus 17.94x for Roblox. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Take-Two Interactive Software has a net margin of -66.62% compared to Skillz's net margin of -235.46%. Skillz's return on equity of -18.97% beat Take-Two Interactive Software's return on equity of -88.53%.

Skillz has a consensus price target of $10.25, signalling upside risk potential of 48.77%. On the other hand Take-Two Interactive Software has an analysts' consensus of $243.05 which suggests that it could grow by 1.96%. Given that Skillz has higher upside potential than Take-Two Interactive Software, analysts believe Skillz is more attractive than Take-Two Interactive Software.

Skillz has a beta of 2.764, which suggesting that the stock is 176.36% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Take-Two Interactive Software has a beta of 1.027, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 2.66%.

Skillz has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Take-Two Interactive Software offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Skillz pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Take-Two Interactive Software pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Skillz quarterly revenues are $22.4M, which are smaller than Take-Two Interactive Software quarterly revenues of $1.6B. Skillz's net income of -$14.9M is higher than Take-Two Interactive Software's net income of -$3.7B. Notably, Skillz's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Take-Two Interactive Software's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Skillz is 1.24x versus 7.41x for Take-Two Interactive Software. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.