CF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Nucor has a net margin of 18.76% compared to CF Industries Holdings's net margin of 1.99%. CF Industries Holdings's return on equity of 17.25% beat Nucor's return on equity of 6.22%.

CF Industries Holdings has a consensus price target of $87.11, signalling downside risk potential of -3.97%. On the other hand Nucor has an analysts' consensus of $146.24 which suggests that it could grow by 32.58%. Given that Nucor has higher upside potential than CF Industries Holdings, analysts believe Nucor is more attractive than CF Industries Holdings.

CF Industries Holdings has a beta of 0.939, which suggesting that the stock is 6.067% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Nucor has a beta of 1.733, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 73.341%.

CF Industries Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.21%. Nucor offers a yield of 1.99% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.55 per share. CF Industries Holdings pays 29.89% of its earnings as a dividend. Nucor pays out 25.75% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

CF Industries Holdings quarterly revenues are $1.7B, which are smaller than Nucor quarterly revenues of $7.8B. CF Industries Holdings's net income of $312M is higher than Nucor's net income of $156M. Notably, CF Industries Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.95x while Nucor's PE ratio is 19.46x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CF Industries Holdings is 2.60x versus 0.85x for Nucor. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Paramount Gold Nevada has a net margin of 18.76% compared to CF Industries Holdings's net margin of --. CF Industries Holdings's return on equity of 17.25% beat Paramount Gold Nevada's return on equity of --.

CF Industries Holdings has a consensus price target of $87.11, signalling downside risk potential of -3.97%. On the other hand Paramount Gold Nevada has an analysts' consensus of $1.40 which suggests that it could grow by 152.66%. Given that Paramount Gold Nevada has higher upside potential than CF Industries Holdings, analysts believe Paramount Gold Nevada is more attractive than CF Industries Holdings.

CF Industries Holdings has a beta of 0.939, which suggesting that the stock is 6.067% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Paramount Gold Nevada has a beta of 1.017, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.74%.

CF Industries Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.21%. Paramount Gold Nevada offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. CF Industries Holdings pays 29.89% of its earnings as a dividend. Paramount Gold Nevada pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. CF Industries Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

CF Industries Holdings quarterly revenues are $1.7B, which are larger than Paramount Gold Nevada quarterly revenues of --. CF Industries Holdings's net income of $312M is higher than Paramount Gold Nevada's net income of -$2.6M. Notably, CF Industries Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.95x while Paramount Gold Nevada's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CF Industries Holdings is 2.60x versus -- for Paramount Gold Nevada. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

CVR Partners LP has a net margin of 18.76% compared to CF Industries Holdings's net margin of 18.96%. CF Industries Holdings's return on equity of 17.25% beat CVR Partners LP's return on equity of 25.42%.

CF Industries Holdings has a consensus price target of $87.11, signalling downside risk potential of -3.97%. On the other hand CVR Partners LP has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -88.52%. Given that CVR Partners LP has more downside risk than CF Industries Holdings, analysts believe CF Industries Holdings is more attractive than CVR Partners LP.

CF Industries Holdings has a beta of 0.939, which suggesting that the stock is 6.067% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CVR Partners LP has a beta of 1.070, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 6.988%.

CF Industries Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.21%. CVR Partners LP offers a yield of 8.58% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $2.26 per share. CF Industries Holdings pays 29.89% of its earnings as a dividend. CVR Partners LP pays out 116.11% of its earnings as a dividend. CF Industries Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but CVR Partners LP's is not.

CF Industries Holdings quarterly revenues are $1.7B, which are larger than CVR Partners LP quarterly revenues of $142.9M. CF Industries Holdings's net income of $312M is higher than CVR Partners LP's net income of $27.1M. Notably, CF Industries Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.95x while CVR Partners LP's PE ratio is 11.61x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CF Industries Holdings is 2.60x versus 1.62x for CVR Partners LP. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Solitario Resources has a net margin of 18.76% compared to CF Industries Holdings's net margin of --. CF Industries Holdings's return on equity of 17.25% beat Solitario Resources's return on equity of --.

CF Industries Holdings has a consensus price target of $87.11, signalling downside risk potential of -3.97%. On the other hand Solitario Resources has an analysts' consensus of $1.50 which suggests that it could grow by 134.38%. Given that Solitario Resources has higher upside potential than CF Industries Holdings, analysts believe Solitario Resources is more attractive than CF Industries Holdings.

CF Industries Holdings has a beta of 0.939, which suggesting that the stock is 6.067% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Solitario Resources has a beta of 0.498, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 50.16%.

CF Industries Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.21%. Solitario Resources offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. CF Industries Holdings pays 29.89% of its earnings as a dividend. Solitario Resources pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. CF Industries Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

CF Industries Holdings quarterly revenues are $1.7B, which are larger than Solitario Resources quarterly revenues of --. CF Industries Holdings's net income of $312M is higher than Solitario Resources's net income of -$511K. Notably, CF Industries Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.95x while Solitario Resources's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CF Industries Holdings is 2.60x versus -- for Solitario Resources. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.