XIACY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

GDS Holdings has a net margin of 5.79% compared to Xiaomi's net margin of -6.49%. Xiaomi's return on equity of 10.33% beat GDS Holdings's return on equity of 15.3%.

Xiaomi has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand GDS Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $42.30 which suggests that it could grow by 59.93%. Given that GDS Holdings has higher upside potential than Xiaomi, analysts believe GDS Holdings is more attractive than Xiaomi.

Xiaomi has a beta of 1.155, which suggesting that the stock is 15.504% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison GDS Holdings has a beta of 0.280, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 71.969%.

Xiaomi has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. GDS Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Xiaomi pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. GDS Holdings pays out 1.58% of its earnings as a dividend. GDS Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Xiaomi quarterly revenues are $12.9B, which are larger than GDS Holdings quarterly revenues of $374M. Xiaomi's net income of $747.5M is higher than GDS Holdings's net income of $582.2M. Notably, Xiaomi's price-to-earnings ratio is 57.65x while GDS Holdings's PE ratio is 10.49x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Xiaomi is 3.76x versus 3.39x for GDS Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

9F has a net margin of 5.79% compared to Xiaomi's net margin of --. Xiaomi's return on equity of 10.33% beat 9F's return on equity of 0.22%.

Xiaomi has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand 9F has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 11419.51%. Given that 9F has higher upside potential than Xiaomi, analysts believe 9F is more attractive than Xiaomi.

Xiaomi has a beta of 1.155, which suggesting that the stock is 15.504% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison 9F has a beta of 0.882, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 11.768%.

Xiaomi has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. 9F offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Xiaomi pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. 9F pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Xiaomi quarterly revenues are $12.9B, which are larger than 9F quarterly revenues of --. Xiaomi's net income of $747.5M is higher than 9F's net income of --. Notably, Xiaomi's price-to-earnings ratio is 57.65x while 9F's PE ratio is 9.05x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Xiaomi is 3.76x versus 0.02x for 9F. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Jianzhi Education Technology Group has a net margin of 5.79% compared to Xiaomi's net margin of --. Xiaomi's return on equity of 10.33% beat Jianzhi Education Technology Group's return on equity of -252.25%.

Xiaomi has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Jianzhi Education Technology Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Xiaomi has higher upside potential than Jianzhi Education Technology Group, analysts believe Xiaomi is more attractive than Jianzhi Education Technology Group.

Xiaomi has a beta of 1.155, which suggesting that the stock is 15.504% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Jianzhi Education Technology Group has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Xiaomi has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Jianzhi Education Technology Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Xiaomi pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Jianzhi Education Technology Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Xiaomi quarterly revenues are $12.9B, which are larger than Jianzhi Education Technology Group quarterly revenues of --. Xiaomi's net income of $747.5M is higher than Jianzhi Education Technology Group's net income of --. Notably, Xiaomi's price-to-earnings ratio is 57.65x while Jianzhi Education Technology Group's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Xiaomi is 3.76x versus 0.39x for Jianzhi Education Technology Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

VNET Group has a net margin of 5.79% compared to Xiaomi's net margin of -0.49%. Xiaomi's return on equity of 10.33% beat VNET Group's return on equity of 2.74%.

Xiaomi has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand VNET Group has an analysts' consensus of $14.61 which suggests that it could grow by 143.55%. Given that VNET Group has higher upside potential than Xiaomi, analysts believe VNET Group is more attractive than Xiaomi.

Xiaomi has a beta of 1.155, which suggesting that the stock is 15.504% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison VNET Group has a beta of 0.141, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 85.943%.

Xiaomi has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. VNET Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Xiaomi pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. VNET Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Xiaomi quarterly revenues are $12.9B, which are larger than VNET Group quarterly revenues of $312.2M. Xiaomi's net income of $747.5M is higher than VNET Group's net income of -$1.5M. Notably, Xiaomi's price-to-earnings ratio is 57.65x while VNET Group's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Xiaomi is 3.76x versus 1.46x for VNET Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.